下水道系统和性能指标——进入21世纪

Richard Ashley , Peter Hopkinson
{"title":"下水道系统和性能指标——进入21世纪","authors":"Richard Ashley ,&nbsp;Peter Hopkinson","doi":"10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00010-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With increasing global privatisation of water service provision and interest in sustainability, the challenge in setting appropriate measures and targets for performance of both service providers and assets is crucial. The business and regulatory context within which the UK water service providers (WSPs) operate is complex. In the UK performance comparisons for a range of service and other attributes are made by the Regulators. In addition other performance measurement frameworks and indicators, especially in the area of environmental sustainability, have been proposed by bodies external to the WSPs. The emergence of interest in asset serviceability is adding to the complexity of performance measurement and comparison and creates tension between short-run demands of customers and longer-term requirements for sustainability.</p><p>Against this background this paper reviews the current framework for measuring and assessing performance of UK WSPs. This review illustrates a number of issues. Firstly the complexity and high levels of performance assessment set by the regulators. Secondly the rapidly changing business and regulatory context in which performance assessment and comparison is made, especially the requirements to measure and demonstrate `serviceability'. Thirdly the problems and difficulty of making meaningful comparisons between WSPs. Fourthly the tension between different areas of performance notably between value for money and customer needs and ecological sustainability.</p><p>Three examples are provided in the paper covering the assessment of: the relative sustainability of service provision to deal with sanitary waste; proposals for performance targets for rat control in sewers; a generic framework for including sustainability in decision making for asset management planning. It is concluded that there are major difficulties in the setting of performance indicators. Contextual and institutional aspects appear to control how these are set, with short-term costs and current regulations being the primary drivers. In the UK, this approach appears to discourage WSPs from investing in innovative solutions and whole-life performance of their assets. It is clear that new research is required if the correct balance in devising appropriate performance indicators is to be attained.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101268,"journal":{"name":"Urban Water","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 123-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00010-9","citationCount":"94","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sewer systems and performance indicators––into the 21st century\",\"authors\":\"Richard Ashley ,&nbsp;Peter Hopkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00010-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With increasing global privatisation of water service provision and interest in sustainability, the challenge in setting appropriate measures and targets for performance of both service providers and assets is crucial. The business and regulatory context within which the UK water service providers (WSPs) operate is complex. In the UK performance comparisons for a range of service and other attributes are made by the Regulators. In addition other performance measurement frameworks and indicators, especially in the area of environmental sustainability, have been proposed by bodies external to the WSPs. The emergence of interest in asset serviceability is adding to the complexity of performance measurement and comparison and creates tension between short-run demands of customers and longer-term requirements for sustainability.</p><p>Against this background this paper reviews the current framework for measuring and assessing performance of UK WSPs. This review illustrates a number of issues. Firstly the complexity and high levels of performance assessment set by the regulators. Secondly the rapidly changing business and regulatory context in which performance assessment and comparison is made, especially the requirements to measure and demonstrate `serviceability'. Thirdly the problems and difficulty of making meaningful comparisons between WSPs. Fourthly the tension between different areas of performance notably between value for money and customer needs and ecological sustainability.</p><p>Three examples are provided in the paper covering the assessment of: the relative sustainability of service provision to deal with sanitary waste; proposals for performance targets for rat control in sewers; a generic framework for including sustainability in decision making for asset management planning. It is concluded that there are major difficulties in the setting of performance indicators. Contextual and institutional aspects appear to control how these are set, with short-term costs and current regulations being the primary drivers. In the UK, this approach appears to discourage WSPs from investing in innovative solutions and whole-life performance of their assets. It is clear that new research is required if the correct balance in devising appropriate performance indicators is to be attained.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Water\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00010-9\",\"citationCount\":\"94\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462075802000109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462075802000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94

摘要

随着全球供水服务日益私有化和对可持续发展的关注,为服务提供者和资产的表现制定适当的措施和目标是至关重要的挑战。英国供水服务供应商(wsp)的经营环境和监管环境是复杂的。在英国,一系列服务和其他属性的绩效比较是由监管机构进行的。此外,其他绩效衡量框架和指标,特别是环境可持续性领域的绩效衡量框架和指标,已由世界环境服务计划以外的机构提出。对资产可服务性的兴趣的出现增加了绩效衡量和比较的复杂性,并在客户的短期需求和长期可持续性需求之间造成了紧张关系。在此背景下,本文回顾了目前衡量和评估英国wsp绩效的框架。这篇综述说明了一些问题。首先是监管机构设定的绩效考核的复杂性和高水平。其次,快速变化的业务和监管环境进行绩效评估和比较,特别是衡量和证明“可服务性”的要求。第三,在wsp之间进行有意义的比较的问题和困难。第四,不同绩效领域之间的紧张关系,特别是物有所值、客户需求和生态可持续性之间的紧张关系。本文提供了三个例子来评估:处理卫生废物的服务提供的相对可持续性;控制污水渠鼠患的服务指标建议;将可持续性纳入资产管理规划决策的通用框架。结论是,在制定绩效指标方面存在重大困难。环境和制度方面似乎控制着这些指标的设定,短期成本和现行法规是主要驱动因素。在英国,这种做法似乎阻碍了水务服务提供商对创新解决方案和资产终身绩效的投资。显然,如果要在制订适当的业绩指标方面取得正确的平衡,就需要进行新的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sewer systems and performance indicators––into the 21st century

With increasing global privatisation of water service provision and interest in sustainability, the challenge in setting appropriate measures and targets for performance of both service providers and assets is crucial. The business and regulatory context within which the UK water service providers (WSPs) operate is complex. In the UK performance comparisons for a range of service and other attributes are made by the Regulators. In addition other performance measurement frameworks and indicators, especially in the area of environmental sustainability, have been proposed by bodies external to the WSPs. The emergence of interest in asset serviceability is adding to the complexity of performance measurement and comparison and creates tension between short-run demands of customers and longer-term requirements for sustainability.

Against this background this paper reviews the current framework for measuring and assessing performance of UK WSPs. This review illustrates a number of issues. Firstly the complexity and high levels of performance assessment set by the regulators. Secondly the rapidly changing business and regulatory context in which performance assessment and comparison is made, especially the requirements to measure and demonstrate `serviceability'. Thirdly the problems and difficulty of making meaningful comparisons between WSPs. Fourthly the tension between different areas of performance notably between value for money and customer needs and ecological sustainability.

Three examples are provided in the paper covering the assessment of: the relative sustainability of service provision to deal with sanitary waste; proposals for performance targets for rat control in sewers; a generic framework for including sustainability in decision making for asset management planning. It is concluded that there are major difficulties in the setting of performance indicators. Contextual and institutional aspects appear to control how these are set, with short-term costs and current regulations being the primary drivers. In the UK, this approach appears to discourage WSPs from investing in innovative solutions and whole-life performance of their assets. It is clear that new research is required if the correct balance in devising appropriate performance indicators is to be attained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial board A data mining approach to modelling of water supply assets Contaminant flows in urban residential water systems Supercritical flow in the 90° junction manhole
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1