Shuai Ma , Qian Tang , Changbao Zhu , Fuyou Wang , Qixiang Feng , Jun Song , Rossitza Setchi , Chenglong Ma , Ran Tao
{"title":"激光粉末床融合构建Ti6Al4V骨支架,由薄片和支柱组成的多孔结构:形态学,力学性能和生物相容性","authors":"Shuai Ma , Qian Tang , Changbao Zhu , Fuyou Wang , Qixiang Feng , Jun Song , Rossitza Setchi , Chenglong Ma , Ran Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)-built triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are designed by implicit functions and are endowed with superior characteristics, such as adjustable mechanical properties and light-weight features for bone repairing; thus, they are considered as potential candidates for bone scaffolds. Unfortunately, previous studies have mainly focused on different TPMS structures. The fundamental understanding of the differences between strut and sheet-based structures remains exclusive, where both were designed by one formula. This consequently hinders their practical applications. Herein, we compared the morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of sheet and strut-based structures. In particular, the different properties and <em>in vivo</em> bone repair effects of the two structures are uncovered. First, the morphology characteristics demonstrate that the manufacturing errors of sheet-based structures with diverse porosities are comparable, and semi-melting powders as well as the ball phenomenon are observed; in comparison, strut-based samples exhibit cracks and thickness shrinking. Second, the mechanical properties indicate that the sheet-based structures have a greater elastic modulus, energy absorption, and better repeatability compared to strut-based structures. Furthermore, layer-by-layer fracturing and diagonal shear failure modes are observed in strut-based and sheet-based structures, respectively. The <em>in vivo</em> experiment demonstrates enhanced bone tissues in the strut-based scaffold. This study significantly enriches our understanding of TPMS structures and provides significant insights in the design of bone scaffolds under various bone damaging conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100243,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772665722000356/pdfft?md5=df8ab3c87f0982dec7f55432d47400bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772665722000356-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laser Powder Bed Fusion-built Ti6Al4V Bone Scaffolds Composed of Sheet and Strut-based Porous Structures: Morphology, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Ma , Qian Tang , Changbao Zhu , Fuyou Wang , Qixiang Feng , Jun Song , Rossitza Setchi , Chenglong Ma , Ran Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)-built triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are designed by implicit functions and are endowed with superior characteristics, such as adjustable mechanical properties and light-weight features for bone repairing; thus, they are considered as potential candidates for bone scaffolds. Unfortunately, previous studies have mainly focused on different TPMS structures. The fundamental understanding of the differences between strut and sheet-based structures remains exclusive, where both were designed by one formula. This consequently hinders their practical applications. Herein, we compared the morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of sheet and strut-based structures. In particular, the different properties and <em>in vivo</em> bone repair effects of the two structures are uncovered. First, the morphology characteristics demonstrate that the manufacturing errors of sheet-based structures with diverse porosities are comparable, and semi-melting powders as well as the ball phenomenon are observed; in comparison, strut-based samples exhibit cracks and thickness shrinking. Second, the mechanical properties indicate that the sheet-based structures have a greater elastic modulus, energy absorption, and better repeatability compared to strut-based structures. Furthermore, layer-by-layer fracturing and diagonal shear failure modes are observed in strut-based and sheet-based structures, respectively. The <em>in vivo</em> experiment demonstrates enhanced bone tissues in the strut-based scaffold. This study significantly enriches our understanding of TPMS structures and provides significant insights in the design of bone scaffolds under various bone damaging conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772665722000356/pdfft?md5=df8ab3c87f0982dec7f55432d47400bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772665722000356-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772665722000356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772665722000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laser Powder Bed Fusion-built Ti6Al4V Bone Scaffolds Composed of Sheet and Strut-based Porous Structures: Morphology, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility
Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)-built triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are designed by implicit functions and are endowed with superior characteristics, such as adjustable mechanical properties and light-weight features for bone repairing; thus, they are considered as potential candidates for bone scaffolds. Unfortunately, previous studies have mainly focused on different TPMS structures. The fundamental understanding of the differences between strut and sheet-based structures remains exclusive, where both were designed by one formula. This consequently hinders their practical applications. Herein, we compared the morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of sheet and strut-based structures. In particular, the different properties and in vivo bone repair effects of the two structures are uncovered. First, the morphology characteristics demonstrate that the manufacturing errors of sheet-based structures with diverse porosities are comparable, and semi-melting powders as well as the ball phenomenon are observed; in comparison, strut-based samples exhibit cracks and thickness shrinking. Second, the mechanical properties indicate that the sheet-based structures have a greater elastic modulus, energy absorption, and better repeatability compared to strut-based structures. Furthermore, layer-by-layer fracturing and diagonal shear failure modes are observed in strut-based and sheet-based structures, respectively. The in vivo experiment demonstrates enhanced bone tissues in the strut-based scaffold. This study significantly enriches our understanding of TPMS structures and provides significant insights in the design of bone scaffolds under various bone damaging conditions.