心理练习对旋律爵士即兴演奏成绩的影响

IF 0.6 0 MUSIC Psychomusicology Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1037/pmu0000206
Peter Miksza, Kevin E. Watson, Ian Calhoun
{"title":"心理练习对旋律爵士即兴演奏成绩的影响","authors":"Peter Miksza, Kevin E. Watson, Ian Calhoun","doi":"10.1037/pmu0000206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of mental practice, physical practice, and mental and physical practice combined on the ability to create melodic jazz solos within chord progressions, possessing relatively simple or complex harmonic characteristics. We also explored whether improvisation achievement varied as a function of general mental imagery ability. Fifty-six jazz studies majors from two large North American universities were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions (physical practice, mental practice, or physical and mental practice combined) and tasked with preparing melodic improvised solos over two sets of chord changes that varied in complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex). The participants’ solos were rated for melodic jazz improvisation achievement by two expert-level professional jazz artists. Participants also completed a self-report questionnaire that captured the degree of the vividness of their visual, aural, cutaneous, kinesthetic, and organic mental imagery. We did not find significant differences in melodic improvisation achievement as a function of practice condition nor did we find that chord progression complexity moderated the effect of practice condition. However, significant differences were detected as a function of chord progression complexity. Theoretical avenues for designing future experiments are discussed in-depth with respect to the typical practice approaches jazz musicians use when developing improvised solos, issues of closed- versus open-class motor skills, cognitive load, and expert memory storage and retrieval.","PeriodicalId":29942,"journal":{"name":"Psychomusicology","volume":"82 1","pages":"40–49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Mental Practice on Melodic Jazz Improvisation Achievement\",\"authors\":\"Peter Miksza, Kevin E. Watson, Ian Calhoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pmu0000206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of mental practice, physical practice, and mental and physical practice combined on the ability to create melodic jazz solos within chord progressions, possessing relatively simple or complex harmonic characteristics. We also explored whether improvisation achievement varied as a function of general mental imagery ability. Fifty-six jazz studies majors from two large North American universities were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions (physical practice, mental practice, or physical and mental practice combined) and tasked with preparing melodic improvised solos over two sets of chord changes that varied in complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex). The participants’ solos were rated for melodic jazz improvisation achievement by two expert-level professional jazz artists. Participants also completed a self-report questionnaire that captured the degree of the vividness of their visual, aural, cutaneous, kinesthetic, and organic mental imagery. We did not find significant differences in melodic improvisation achievement as a function of practice condition nor did we find that chord progression complexity moderated the effect of practice condition. However, significant differences were detected as a function of chord progression complexity. Theoretical avenues for designing future experiments are discussed in-depth with respect to the typical practice approaches jazz musicians use when developing improvised solos, issues of closed- versus open-class motor skills, cognitive load, and expert memory storage and retrieval.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"40–49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychomusicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究的目的是检验心理练习、身体练习以及身心结合练习对和弦进行旋律爵士独奏能力的影响,和弦进行具有相对简单或复杂的和声特征。我们还探讨了即兴表演成就是否随一般心理意象能力的变化而变化。来自北美两所大型大学的56名爵士研究专业的学生被随机分配到三种实验条件中的一种(物理练习,心理练习,或身体和心理结合练习),并被要求准备两组复杂程度不同的和弦变化的旋律即兴独奏(即简单与复杂)。参与者的独奏由两位专家级的专业爵士艺术家评定为旋律爵士即兴演奏的成就。参与者还完成了一份自我报告问卷,记录了他们的视觉、听觉、皮肤、动觉和有机心理意象的生动程度。我们没有发现旋律即兴演奏成就作为练习条件的显著差异,也没有发现和弦进行复杂性调节练习条件的影响。然而,和弦进行复杂性的函数检测到显著差异。设计未来实验的理论途径深入讨论了爵士音乐家在发展即兴独奏时使用的典型实践方法,封闭式与开放式运动技能,认知负荷和专家记忆存储和检索的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Mental Practice on Melodic Jazz Improvisation Achievement
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of mental practice, physical practice, and mental and physical practice combined on the ability to create melodic jazz solos within chord progressions, possessing relatively simple or complex harmonic characteristics. We also explored whether improvisation achievement varied as a function of general mental imagery ability. Fifty-six jazz studies majors from two large North American universities were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions (physical practice, mental practice, or physical and mental practice combined) and tasked with preparing melodic improvised solos over two sets of chord changes that varied in complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex). The participants’ solos were rated for melodic jazz improvisation achievement by two expert-level professional jazz artists. Participants also completed a self-report questionnaire that captured the degree of the vividness of their visual, aural, cutaneous, kinesthetic, and organic mental imagery. We did not find significant differences in melodic improvisation achievement as a function of practice condition nor did we find that chord progression complexity moderated the effect of practice condition. However, significant differences were detected as a function of chord progression complexity. Theoretical avenues for designing future experiments are discussed in-depth with respect to the typical practice approaches jazz musicians use when developing improvised solos, issues of closed- versus open-class motor skills, cognitive load, and expert memory storage and retrieval.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychomusicology
Psychomusicology Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Preferred Music Listening Does Not Affect Cognitive Inhibition in Young and Older Adults Preferred music listening does not affect cognitive inhibition in young and older adults. Capturing coordination and intentionality in joint musical improvisation. Supplemental Material for Capturing Coordination and Intentionality in Joint Musical Improvisation Absolute pitch: A literature review of underlying factors, with special regard to music pedagogy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1