联合办公的财务影响:商业办公市场的租金价格和市场动态

Andrea M. Chegut, M. Langen
{"title":"联合办公的财务影响:商业办公市场的租金价格和市场动态","authors":"Andrea M. Chegut, M. Langen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3481142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coworking providers, like WeWork, have shifted the competitive landscape for office tenants through differentiating office amenities, leasing fully-equipped desks or offices over flexible time periods. However, even though coworking providers are a tenant type in consumer demand, little is known about the strategic interaction of this growing tenant with landlords in the real estate sector. In this paper, we assess landlord-coworking provider interaction through lease contract valuation, assessing if landlords see coworking providers as a substitute, benefit or risk, compared to other tenants. Using lease contracts from six US cities between 2008 to 2018, we compare rent conditions between coworking providers and tenants within the same building. We document that landlords treat coworking providers as substitutes not differentiating in effective rent compared to other tenants. Coworking providers take systematically longer lease durations, resulting in higher tenant incentives, such as free rent periods and tenant improvement concessions. Controlling for lease duration, coworking providers receive significantly more tenant concessions. We do not find value-increasing external effects of coworking providers, concluding that landlords are indifferent towards coworking tenants.","PeriodicalId":21047,"journal":{"name":"Real Estate eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Financial Impacts of Coworking: Rental Prices and Market Dynamics in the Commercial Office Market\",\"authors\":\"Andrea M. Chegut, M. Langen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3481142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coworking providers, like WeWork, have shifted the competitive landscape for office tenants through differentiating office amenities, leasing fully-equipped desks or offices over flexible time periods. However, even though coworking providers are a tenant type in consumer demand, little is known about the strategic interaction of this growing tenant with landlords in the real estate sector. In this paper, we assess landlord-coworking provider interaction through lease contract valuation, assessing if landlords see coworking providers as a substitute, benefit or risk, compared to other tenants. Using lease contracts from six US cities between 2008 to 2018, we compare rent conditions between coworking providers and tenants within the same building. We document that landlords treat coworking providers as substitutes not differentiating in effective rent compared to other tenants. Coworking providers take systematically longer lease durations, resulting in higher tenant incentives, such as free rent periods and tenant improvement concessions. Controlling for lease duration, coworking providers receive significantly more tenant concessions. We do not find value-increasing external effects of coworking providers, concluding that landlords are indifferent towards coworking tenants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Real Estate eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Real Estate eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3481142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real Estate eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3481142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

像WeWork这样的共享办公供应商,通过差异化的办公设施,在灵活的时间段内租赁设备齐全的办公桌或办公室,已经改变了办公室租户的竞争格局。然而,尽管共享办公供应商是消费者需求中的一种租户类型,但人们对这种不断增长的租户与房地产行业房东之间的战略互动知之甚少。在本文中,我们通过租赁合同估值来评估房东与联合办公服务提供商之间的互动,评估房东是否将联合办公服务提供商视为替代、利益或风险。我们利用2008年至2018年美国六个城市的租赁合同,比较了同一栋大楼内共享办公供应商和租户之间的租金状况。我们的研究表明,房东将联合办公供应商视为替代品,与其他租户相比,在有效租金方面没有区别。联合办公场所的供应商系统性地延长租期,从而给租户带来更高的激励,比如免租期和租户改善优惠。在控制租期后,联合办公提供商获得了更多的租户优惠。我们没有发现联合办公服务提供商的增值外部效应,得出的结论是房东对联合办公租户漠不关心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Financial Impacts of Coworking: Rental Prices and Market Dynamics in the Commercial Office Market
Coworking providers, like WeWork, have shifted the competitive landscape for office tenants through differentiating office amenities, leasing fully-equipped desks or offices over flexible time periods. However, even though coworking providers are a tenant type in consumer demand, little is known about the strategic interaction of this growing tenant with landlords in the real estate sector. In this paper, we assess landlord-coworking provider interaction through lease contract valuation, assessing if landlords see coworking providers as a substitute, benefit or risk, compared to other tenants. Using lease contracts from six US cities between 2008 to 2018, we compare rent conditions between coworking providers and tenants within the same building. We document that landlords treat coworking providers as substitutes not differentiating in effective rent compared to other tenants. Coworking providers take systematically longer lease durations, resulting in higher tenant incentives, such as free rent periods and tenant improvement concessions. Controlling for lease duration, coworking providers receive significantly more tenant concessions. We do not find value-increasing external effects of coworking providers, concluding that landlords are indifferent towards coworking tenants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial Cycles Across G7 Economies: A View from Wavelet Analysis Assessing Lithuanian housing market for bubble Household Income, Asset Location and Real Estate Value: Evidence from REITs Household Debt and Labour Supply Decomposing Industry Leverage in the U.S.: the REIT Debt Puzzle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1