经济和商业历史的最新趋势:2016年至2020年发表的最具影响力文章分析

V. Kulikov, Iryna Skubii
{"title":"经济和商业历史的最新趋势:2016年至2020年发表的最具影响力文章分析","authors":"V. Kulikov, Iryna Skubii","doi":"10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to analyse recent trends in economic and business history from 2016 to 2020 and identify the factors determining the impact of the research articles. The authors analysed the ten most cited articles published in prestigious international peer-reviewed journals on economic and business history. They summarize the content of every article and explain its contribution to the field. The article defines efficient theoretical instruments for studies in the field of economic and business history. The observations can be useful to researchers concerned about the impact of their publications and those interested in the dynamics of the field. The synthesis of the observations revealed the following most important factors determining the impact of research articles. The proposal of a new theory or concept certainly raises the interest of the academic community. A new representative empirical material is crucial to increase the level of citations in the field of economic history. Alternatively, a good strategy is to present a new efficient method for the analysis of existing datasets. Explicit explanation of how the new data and methods specify conventional perceptions about historical events and processes increases the popularity of publications. An effective way to raise the interest of the readers is to look at the deviations from the “norms” – historical anomalies and paradoxes. A critical synthetic review of the literature on a topic or a problem is usually appreciated by the community of economic historians, but it is especially popular in journals on business history. The final part of the article offers observations on the disciplinary and national diversity of author teams. It concludes that such diversity results in the multidisciplinary character of the studies and increases their value for the sister disciplines.","PeriodicalId":33522,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Trends in Economic and Business History: The Analysis of the Most Impactful Articles Published from 2016 to 2020\",\"authors\":\"V. Kulikov, Iryna Skubii\",\"doi\":\"10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article aims to analyse recent trends in economic and business history from 2016 to 2020 and identify the factors determining the impact of the research articles. The authors analysed the ten most cited articles published in prestigious international peer-reviewed journals on economic and business history. They summarize the content of every article and explain its contribution to the field. The article defines efficient theoretical instruments for studies in the field of economic and business history. The observations can be useful to researchers concerned about the impact of their publications and those interested in the dynamics of the field. The synthesis of the observations revealed the following most important factors determining the impact of research articles. The proposal of a new theory or concept certainly raises the interest of the academic community. A new representative empirical material is crucial to increase the level of citations in the field of economic history. Alternatively, a good strategy is to present a new efficient method for the analysis of existing datasets. Explicit explanation of how the new data and methods specify conventional perceptions about historical events and processes increases the popularity of publications. An effective way to raise the interest of the readers is to look at the deviations from the “norms” – historical anomalies and paradoxes. A critical synthetic review of the literature on a topic or a problem is usually appreciated by the community of economic historians, but it is especially popular in journals on business history. The final part of the article offers observations on the disciplinary and national diversity of author teams. It concludes that such diversity results in the multidisciplinary character of the studies and increases their value for the sister disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析2016年至2020年经济和商业历史的最新趋势,并确定决定研究文章影响的因素。作者分析了发表在国际知名同行评议的经济和商业历史期刊上被引用次数最多的10篇文章。他们总结每篇文章的内容,并解释其对该领域的贡献。本文定义了经济史和商业史领域研究的有效理论工具。这些观察结果对关注其出版物影响的研究人员和对该领域动态感兴趣的研究人员很有用。综合观察结果揭示了以下最重要的因素决定研究文章的影响。一个新理论或新概念的提出必然会引起学术界的兴趣。一种新的具有代表性的实证材料对于提高经济史领域的引用水平至关重要。另外,一个好的策略是提出一种新的有效方法来分析现有的数据集。对新数据和新方法如何明确说明关于历史事件和过程的传统观念的明确解释增加了出版物的受欢迎程度。提高读者兴趣的一个有效途径是关注与“规范”的偏差——历史的反常和悖论。对某一主题或问题的文献进行批判性综合评论通常受到经济历史学界的赞赏,但在商业史期刊中尤其受欢迎。文章的最后一部分提供了对作者团队的学科和国家多样性的观察。它的结论是,这种多样性导致了研究的多学科特征,并增加了它们对姐妹学科的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent Trends in Economic and Business History: The Analysis of the Most Impactful Articles Published from 2016 to 2020
The article aims to analyse recent trends in economic and business history from 2016 to 2020 and identify the factors determining the impact of the research articles. The authors analysed the ten most cited articles published in prestigious international peer-reviewed journals on economic and business history. They summarize the content of every article and explain its contribution to the field. The article defines efficient theoretical instruments for studies in the field of economic and business history. The observations can be useful to researchers concerned about the impact of their publications and those interested in the dynamics of the field. The synthesis of the observations revealed the following most important factors determining the impact of research articles. The proposal of a new theory or concept certainly raises the interest of the academic community. A new representative empirical material is crucial to increase the level of citations in the field of economic history. Alternatively, a good strategy is to present a new efficient method for the analysis of existing datasets. Explicit explanation of how the new data and methods specify conventional perceptions about historical events and processes increases the popularity of publications. An effective way to raise the interest of the readers is to look at the deviations from the “norms” – historical anomalies and paradoxes. A critical synthetic review of the literature on a topic or a problem is usually appreciated by the community of economic historians, but it is especially popular in journals on business history. The final part of the article offers observations on the disciplinary and national diversity of author teams. It concludes that such diversity results in the multidisciplinary character of the studies and increases their value for the sister disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the business process through reengineering Clinical trials market: state and prospects, IT segment The use of tools of business communication culture during business negotiations Ecologization of production as an innovative direction for the development of domestic business entities Multifactor econometric models of the standard of living of the population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1