{"title":"Sonatas for Pianoforte and Violin Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827), ed. Clive Brown Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2020 Two volumes (each with score/urtext violin part/performance part), pp. lxxv + 151/49/49, lxxvii + 210/64/64, ISMN 979 0 006 56378 4","authors":"E. Buurman","doi":"10.1017/S1478570621000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clive Brown’s edition of the complete Beethoven sonatas for violin and piano is one of many Bärenreiter Urtext editions of Beethoven’s music published in time for the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the composer’s birth in 2020. It is only the second modern critical edition of this repertory, and it comes more than forty years after Sieghard Brandenburg’s version for the so-called Neue Gesamtausgabe (Beethoven Werke, series 5, volumes 1 and 2 (Munich: Henle, 1974)), which did not include a critical report. Brown’s edition goes far beyond updating our current understanding of the text and source materials for the sonatas, however. As well as a critical commentary and historical introduction to the sonatas, it provides a wealth of information about historical performance. The edition has two violin parts: an urtext with minimal editorial intervention, and a performance part edited with historically inspired fingerings and bowings that often reflect practices that are ‘no longer familiar in this repertoire’ (xxxvi). The preface material includes an extended essay on historical performance practices associated with Beethoven’s music, and the edition comes with an accompanying online performance-practice commentary, co-written with fortepianist Neal Peres da Costa, that includes bar-by-bar explanations of many of the editorial notations in the performance part as well as suggestions for further historically informed approaches. The edition aims not only to present a critically edited text for the sonatas, but also to enable performers to experiment with performance practices that ‘can help us reinvigorate [Beethoven’s] music with some of the unfamiliarity and unpredictability that made it so challenging and exciting for his contemporaries’ (x). The source materials for Beethoven’s violin sonatas are not plentiful: in the case of the first four of the ten sonatas, the source nearest to the composer is the first edition, while some autograph and copyists’ manuscripts survive from Op. 24 onwards. Unsurprisingly, the text of Brown’s edition does not differ substantially from that of the Neue Gesamtausgabe, though the Critical Report details many instances where the sources contain ambiguities or textual errors. One of the most consistent ambiguities is the placement of slurs, over which neither Beethoven nor the engravers of the first editions apparently took particular care. Brown, like the previous editors of the violin sonatas, has therefore had to do a fair amount of interpretation in his notation of the performing parts, but his critical notes and occasional footnotes in the parts themselves often indicate plausible alternative readings. The essay ‘Reading between the Lines of Beethoven’s Notation’, which is presented in both English and German across more than sixty pages at the beginning of each volume of the piano part, presents an overview of evidence relating to the performing practices of Beethoven’s lifetime. While information about historical approaches to ornamentation, articulation and tempo is commonplace in modern urtext editions of classical repertory, Brown’s essay also outlines a wealth of","PeriodicalId":11521,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth Century Music","volume":"25 1","pages":"70 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478570621000294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
克莱夫·布朗版本的贝多芬小提琴和钢琴奏鸣曲全集是众多Bärenreiter贝多芬音乐的非文本版本之一,出版于2020年作曲家诞辰250周年之际。这只是该曲目的第二个现代批评版本,它是在Sieghard Brandenburg的所谓新作品版本(贝多芬作品,系列5,卷1和2(慕尼黑:Henle, 1974))之后的40多年,其中没有包括批评报告。然而,布朗的版本远远超出了我们目前对奏鸣曲文本和原始材料的理解。除了对奏鸣曲的批判性评论和历史介绍外,它还提供了有关历史表演的丰富信息。该版本有两个小提琴部分:编辑干预最少的文本,以及由历史启发的指法和弓弦编辑的表演部分,通常反映出“在这个曲目中不再熟悉”的做法(xxxvi)。序言材料包括一篇关于与贝多芬音乐相关的历史表演实践的扩展文章,该版本附带了与钢琴家Neal Peres da Costa共同撰写的在线表演实践评论。这包括对表演部分的许多编辑注释的逐条解释,以及对进一步了解历史的方法的建议。该版本的目的不仅是为奏鸣曲提供一个经过批判性编辑的文本,而且还使表演者能够尝试表演实践,“可以帮助我们重振[贝多芬]音乐,使其具有一些不熟悉和不可预测性,使其对同时代的人来说如此具有挑战性和令人兴奋”(x)。贝多芬小提琴奏鸣曲的原始材料并不丰富:就十首奏鸣曲中的前四首而言,最接近作曲家的资料来源是第一版,而一些亲笔签名和抄写员的手稿则从作品24号开始流传下来。不出所料,布朗版本的文本与新Gesamtausgabe的文本没有很大的不同,尽管关键报告详细说明了许多来源包含含糊不清或文本错误的例子。最一致的歧义之一是污语的位置,贝多芬和第一版的雕刻家显然都没有特别注意。因此,像小提琴奏鸣曲之前的编辑一样,布朗不得不在他对演奏部分的注释中做相当多的解释,但他在部分本身的批评音符和偶尔的脚注往往表明了合理的替代阅读。这篇文章“阅读贝多芬的符号之间的行”,这是在英语和德语超过60页,在钢琴部分的每卷的开始,提出了与贝多芬一生的表演实践的证据概述。虽然在古典剧目的现代无文本版本中,关于装饰、发音和节奏的历史方法的信息是司空见惯的,但布朗的文章也概述了丰富的
Sonatas for Pianoforte and Violin Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827), ed. Clive Brown Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2020 Two volumes (each with score/urtext violin part/performance part), pp. lxxv + 151/49/49, lxxvii + 210/64/64, ISMN 979 0 006 56378 4
Clive Brown’s edition of the complete Beethoven sonatas for violin and piano is one of many Bärenreiter Urtext editions of Beethoven’s music published in time for the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the composer’s birth in 2020. It is only the second modern critical edition of this repertory, and it comes more than forty years after Sieghard Brandenburg’s version for the so-called Neue Gesamtausgabe (Beethoven Werke, series 5, volumes 1 and 2 (Munich: Henle, 1974)), which did not include a critical report. Brown’s edition goes far beyond updating our current understanding of the text and source materials for the sonatas, however. As well as a critical commentary and historical introduction to the sonatas, it provides a wealth of information about historical performance. The edition has two violin parts: an urtext with minimal editorial intervention, and a performance part edited with historically inspired fingerings and bowings that often reflect practices that are ‘no longer familiar in this repertoire’ (xxxvi). The preface material includes an extended essay on historical performance practices associated with Beethoven’s music, and the edition comes with an accompanying online performance-practice commentary, co-written with fortepianist Neal Peres da Costa, that includes bar-by-bar explanations of many of the editorial notations in the performance part as well as suggestions for further historically informed approaches. The edition aims not only to present a critically edited text for the sonatas, but also to enable performers to experiment with performance practices that ‘can help us reinvigorate [Beethoven’s] music with some of the unfamiliarity and unpredictability that made it so challenging and exciting for his contemporaries’ (x). The source materials for Beethoven’s violin sonatas are not plentiful: in the case of the first four of the ten sonatas, the source nearest to the composer is the first edition, while some autograph and copyists’ manuscripts survive from Op. 24 onwards. Unsurprisingly, the text of Brown’s edition does not differ substantially from that of the Neue Gesamtausgabe, though the Critical Report details many instances where the sources contain ambiguities or textual errors. One of the most consistent ambiguities is the placement of slurs, over which neither Beethoven nor the engravers of the first editions apparently took particular care. Brown, like the previous editors of the violin sonatas, has therefore had to do a fair amount of interpretation in his notation of the performing parts, but his critical notes and occasional footnotes in the parts themselves often indicate plausible alternative readings. The essay ‘Reading between the Lines of Beethoven’s Notation’, which is presented in both English and German across more than sixty pages at the beginning of each volume of the piano part, presents an overview of evidence relating to the performing practices of Beethoven’s lifetime. While information about historical approaches to ornamentation, articulation and tempo is commonplace in modern urtext editions of classical repertory, Brown’s essay also outlines a wealth of