大流行期间研究生在线教育与面对面教育的比较

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International Education in Business Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049
Lynn A. Fish, C. R. Snodgrass, Ji-Hee Kim
{"title":"大流行期间研究生在线教育与面对面教育的比较","authors":"Lynn A. Fish, C. R. Snodgrass, Ji-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to compare graduate student perspectives of online versus face-to-face (FTF) education during the pandemic at two different universities. One university, the “International University”, was physically located in Korea but served an international base of students, and the other was a Jesuit, Catholic University in the USA.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn online Qualtrics survey was used to gather student perceptions on a five-point Likert scale on individual and program factors. Chi-square analysis using the contingency coefficient as the nominal value was performed to uncover significant differences.\n\n\nFindings\nSignificant differences between the two groups existed on motivation, discipline, self-directed, independence, cost investment, preference, happiness, difficulty, student-to-student interaction and student-to-instructor interaction. This research has implications for instructors and administrators in identifying shortcomings and highlighting the uniqueness of different practices around the world.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPrevious studies on student perceptions have been performed. However, this study is original in the fact that it directly compares two different graduate student populations perspectives of online versus FTF during the pandemic.\n","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of graduate university perspectives of online versus face-to-face during the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Lynn A. Fish, C. R. Snodgrass, Ji-Hee Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to compare graduate student perspectives of online versus face-to-face (FTF) education during the pandemic at two different universities. One university, the “International University”, was physically located in Korea but served an international base of students, and the other was a Jesuit, Catholic University in the USA.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAn online Qualtrics survey was used to gather student perceptions on a five-point Likert scale on individual and program factors. Chi-square analysis using the contingency coefficient as the nominal value was performed to uncover significant differences.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nSignificant differences between the two groups existed on motivation, discipline, self-directed, independence, cost investment, preference, happiness, difficulty, student-to-student interaction and student-to-instructor interaction. This research has implications for instructors and administrators in identifying shortcomings and highlighting the uniqueness of different practices around the world.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nPrevious studies on student perceptions have been performed. However, this study is original in the fact that it directly compares two different graduate student populations perspectives of online versus FTF during the pandemic.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Education in Business\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Education in Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-07-2022-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较两所不同大学的研究生在大流行期间对在线教育和面对面教育的看法。一所大学,“国际大学”,位于韩国,但为国际学生提供服务,另一所大学是美国的耶稣会天主教大学。设计/方法/方法一项在线质量调查用于收集学生对个人和项目因素的五点李克特量表的看法。使用权变系数作为标称值进行卡方分析以发现显著差异。两组在动机、纪律、自主、独立性、成本投入、偏好、快乐、难度、学生与学生互动、学生与教师互动等方面存在显著差异。这项研究对教师和管理人员在识别缺点和突出世界各地不同实践的独特性方面具有启示意义。原创性/价值先前已经对学生的认知进行了研究。然而,这项研究的原创性在于,它直接比较了大流行期间两种不同的研究生群体对在线和FTF的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of graduate university perspectives of online versus face-to-face during the pandemic
Purpose This study aims to compare graduate student perspectives of online versus face-to-face (FTF) education during the pandemic at two different universities. One university, the “International University”, was physically located in Korea but served an international base of students, and the other was a Jesuit, Catholic University in the USA. Design/methodology/approach An online Qualtrics survey was used to gather student perceptions on a five-point Likert scale on individual and program factors. Chi-square analysis using the contingency coefficient as the nominal value was performed to uncover significant differences. Findings Significant differences between the two groups existed on motivation, discipline, self-directed, independence, cost investment, preference, happiness, difficulty, student-to-student interaction and student-to-instructor interaction. This research has implications for instructors and administrators in identifying shortcomings and highlighting the uniqueness of different practices around the world. Originality/value Previous studies on student perceptions have been performed. However, this study is original in the fact that it directly compares two different graduate student populations perspectives of online versus FTF during the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing business education: neurodiversity informed faculty development practices Teaching and learning in business schools post-pandemic: a digital future Short-term study abroad (STSA): a review of key risks and challenges Faculty-Led Program: Food and Beverage Supply Chain – from the first mile to the last mile Project management education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a multi-method approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1