法官对法庭上设施犬的看法

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW Juvenile and Family Court Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-09 DOI:10.1111/jfcj.12214
Arial R. Meyer, Christine M. McDermott, Monica K. Miller, Shawn Marsh
{"title":"法官对法庭上设施犬的看法","authors":"Arial R. Meyer,&nbsp;Christine M. McDermott,&nbsp;Monica K. Miller,&nbsp;Shawn Marsh","doi":"10.1111/jfcj.12214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined judges’ perceptions of facility dogs used to comfort witnesses during testimony in courtrooms. Content analysis of an open-ended survey question revealed that most judges support facility dog use to some degree, especially for children and in family, dependency, or juvenile courts. Perceived benefits included providing emotional support for witnesses who then could be calmer and provide better testimony (e.g., more accurate, more truthful, clearer). Perceived drawbacks included potential disruption, access issues for those allergic to or afraid of dogs, and bias. We discuss future research and implications for judges, advocates, and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44632,"journal":{"name":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","volume":"73 1","pages":"41-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judges’ perceptions of facility dogs in the courtroom\",\"authors\":\"Arial R. Meyer,&nbsp;Christine M. McDermott,&nbsp;Monica K. Miller,&nbsp;Shawn Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfcj.12214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examined judges’ perceptions of facility dogs used to comfort witnesses during testimony in courtrooms. Content analysis of an open-ended survey question revealed that most judges support facility dog use to some degree, especially for children and in family, dependency, or juvenile courts. Perceived benefits included providing emotional support for witnesses who then could be calmer and provide better testimony (e.g., more accurate, more truthful, clearer). Perceived drawbacks included potential disruption, access issues for those allergic to or afraid of dogs, and bias. We discuss future research and implications for judges, advocates, and researchers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juvenile and Family Court Journal\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"41-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juvenile and Family Court Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfcj.12214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juvenile and Family Court Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfcj.12214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了法官对在法庭上作证时用来安慰证人的设施狗的看法。对开放式调查问题的内容分析显示,大多数法官在某种程度上支持设施狗的使用,特别是对儿童和家庭,依赖或少年法庭。可感知的好处包括为证人提供情感支持,这样他们就可以更冷静,提供更好的证词(例如,更准确、更真实、更清晰)。感知到的缺点包括潜在的干扰,对狗过敏或害怕狗的人的访问问题,以及偏见。我们讨论了未来的研究以及对法官、律师和研究人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judges’ perceptions of facility dogs in the courtroom

We examined judges’ perceptions of facility dogs used to comfort witnesses during testimony in courtrooms. Content analysis of an open-ended survey question revealed that most judges support facility dog use to some degree, especially for children and in family, dependency, or juvenile courts. Perceived benefits included providing emotional support for witnesses who then could be calmer and provide better testimony (e.g., more accurate, more truthful, clearer). Perceived drawbacks included potential disruption, access issues for those allergic to or afraid of dogs, and bias. We discuss future research and implications for judges, advocates, and researchers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Juvenile and Family Court Journal, published by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges since 1949, focuses on issues of interest to the field of juvenile and family justice, including: - child abuse and neglect - juvenile delinquency - domestic violence - substance abuse - child custody and visitation - judicial leadership
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Determine if they can decide—Rethinking adolescent decision-making ability in the trial and medical context The impact of therapeutic jurisprudence on juvenile recidivism: The country road to rehabilitation Examining marijuana use, sexual risk, and HIV testing outcomes among young people with intersecting marginalized social identities in juvenile drug courts Juvenile justice at a crossroad between crime control and rehabilitation: A study of philosophies and practices in Austria and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1