多数投票过程和其他共识过程

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1214/20-AAP1586
M. Bramson, L. Gray
{"title":"多数投票过程和其他共识过程","authors":"M. Bramson, L. Gray","doi":"10.1214/20-AAP1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The majority vote process was one of the first interacting particle systems to be investigated. It can be described briefly as follows. There are two possible opinions at each site of a graph G. At rate 1 − ε, the opinion at a site aligns with the majority opinion at its neighboring sites and, at rate ε, the opinion at a site is randomized due to noise, where ε ∈ [0, 1] is a parameter. Despite the simple dynamics of the majority vote process, its equilibrium behavior is difficult to analyze when the noise rate is small but positive. In particular, when the underlying graph is G = Z with n ≥ 2, it is not known whether the process possesses more than one equilibrium. This is surprising, especially in light of the close analogy between this model and the stochastic Ising model, where much more is known. Here, we study the majority vote process on the infinite tree Td with vertex degree d. For d ≥ 5 and small noise, we show that there are uncountably many mutually singular equilibria, with convergence to such an equilibrium occurring exponentially quickly from nearby initial states. Our methods are quite flexible and extend to a broader class of models, consensus processes. This class includes the stochastic Ising model and other processes in which the dynamics at a site depend on the number of neighbors holding a given opinion. All of our proofs are carried out in this broader context.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The majority vote process and other consensus processes on trees\",\"authors\":\"M. Bramson, L. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/20-AAP1586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The majority vote process was one of the first interacting particle systems to be investigated. It can be described briefly as follows. There are two possible opinions at each site of a graph G. At rate 1 − ε, the opinion at a site aligns with the majority opinion at its neighboring sites and, at rate ε, the opinion at a site is randomized due to noise, where ε ∈ [0, 1] is a parameter. Despite the simple dynamics of the majority vote process, its equilibrium behavior is difficult to analyze when the noise rate is small but positive. In particular, when the underlying graph is G = Z with n ≥ 2, it is not known whether the process possesses more than one equilibrium. This is surprising, especially in light of the close analogy between this model and the stochastic Ising model, where much more is known. Here, we study the majority vote process on the infinite tree Td with vertex degree d. For d ≥ 5 and small noise, we show that there are uncountably many mutually singular equilibria, with convergence to such an equilibrium occurring exponentially quickly from nearby initial states. Our methods are quite flexible and extend to a broader class of models, consensus processes. This class includes the stochastic Ising model and other processes in which the dynamics at a site depend on the number of neighbors holding a given opinion. All of our proofs are carried out in this broader context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-AAP1586\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-AAP1586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多数投票过程是最早被研究的相互作用粒子系统之一。它可以简单地描述如下。在图g的每个点上都有两种可能的意见,在率为1−ε时,一个点的意见与其相邻点的多数意见一致,在率为ε时,一个点的意见由于噪声而随机化,其中ε∈[0,1]是一个参数。尽管多数投票过程的动力学简单,但当噪声率很小但为正值时,其平衡行为难以分析。特别是,当底层图为G = Z且n≥2时,不知道该过程是否具有多个平衡。这是令人惊讶的,特别是考虑到该模型与随机伊辛模型之间的密切相似,后者已知的要多得多。本文研究了顶点度为d的无限树Td上的多数投票过程。当d≥5且噪声小时,我们证明了存在无数个相互奇异平衡点,并且从附近的初始状态以指数速度收敛到这样的平衡点。我们的方法非常灵活,可以扩展到更广泛的模型,共识过程。这门课包括随机伊辛模型和其他过程,在这些过程中,一个地点的动态取决于持有给定意见的邻居的数量。我们所有的证明都是在这个更广泛的背景下进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The majority vote process and other consensus processes on trees
The majority vote process was one of the first interacting particle systems to be investigated. It can be described briefly as follows. There are two possible opinions at each site of a graph G. At rate 1 − ε, the opinion at a site aligns with the majority opinion at its neighboring sites and, at rate ε, the opinion at a site is randomized due to noise, where ε ∈ [0, 1] is a parameter. Despite the simple dynamics of the majority vote process, its equilibrium behavior is difficult to analyze when the noise rate is small but positive. In particular, when the underlying graph is G = Z with n ≥ 2, it is not known whether the process possesses more than one equilibrium. This is surprising, especially in light of the close analogy between this model and the stochastic Ising model, where much more is known. Here, we study the majority vote process on the infinite tree Td with vertex degree d. For d ≥ 5 and small noise, we show that there are uncountably many mutually singular equilibria, with convergence to such an equilibrium occurring exponentially quickly from nearby initial states. Our methods are quite flexible and extend to a broader class of models, consensus processes. This class includes the stochastic Ising model and other processes in which the dynamics at a site depend on the number of neighbors holding a given opinion. All of our proofs are carried out in this broader context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1