{"title":"重建房屋,重建人民:西114街与房屋重建失败的承诺","authors":"B. Goldstein","doi":"10.5749/buildland.26.2.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article explores the rehabilitation of a tenement block of Harlem's West 114th Street in the late 1960s in order to examine the nature of housing rehabilitation as a common architectural practice in the aftermath of midcentury urban renewal. Rehabilitation became an antidote to renewal's human and architectural costs by promising the retention of buildings and the people who inhabited them. Sponsors intended the West 114th Street project to be a model for such approaches, generating extensive documentation in a book, documentary film, and local and national press. Yet a close reading of the project and this multimedia record suggests a more complex—and often fraught—history of rehabilitation. Despite promising to pursue architectural and social interventions equally on a block struggling with poverty and drug addiction, backers came to prioritize the physical at the expense of the social. Moreover, in their drive to showcase the architectural transformation that provided the most compelling images of this as a model project, rehab supporters espoused a physically determinist view that architectural change was itself enough to solve difficult socioeconomic challenges. Rehabilitation thus ultimately repeated many of urban renewal's mistakes, leaving residents still struggling in homes whose physical improvements proved fleeting.","PeriodicalId":41826,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","volume":"10 1","pages":"43 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabbing Housing, Rehabbing People: West 114th Street and the Failed Promise of Housing Rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"B. Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/buildland.26.2.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article explores the rehabilitation of a tenement block of Harlem's West 114th Street in the late 1960s in order to examine the nature of housing rehabilitation as a common architectural practice in the aftermath of midcentury urban renewal. Rehabilitation became an antidote to renewal's human and architectural costs by promising the retention of buildings and the people who inhabited them. Sponsors intended the West 114th Street project to be a model for such approaches, generating extensive documentation in a book, documentary film, and local and national press. Yet a close reading of the project and this multimedia record suggests a more complex—and often fraught—history of rehabilitation. Despite promising to pursue architectural and social interventions equally on a block struggling with poverty and drug addiction, backers came to prioritize the physical at the expense of the social. Moreover, in their drive to showcase the architectural transformation that provided the most compelling images of this as a model project, rehab supporters espoused a physically determinist view that architectural change was itself enough to solve difficult socioeconomic challenges. Rehabilitation thus ultimately repeated many of urban renewal's mistakes, leaving residents still struggling in homes whose physical improvements proved fleeting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.26.2.0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.26.2.0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rehabbing Housing, Rehabbing People: West 114th Street and the Failed Promise of Housing Rehabilitation
Abstract:This article explores the rehabilitation of a tenement block of Harlem's West 114th Street in the late 1960s in order to examine the nature of housing rehabilitation as a common architectural practice in the aftermath of midcentury urban renewal. Rehabilitation became an antidote to renewal's human and architectural costs by promising the retention of buildings and the people who inhabited them. Sponsors intended the West 114th Street project to be a model for such approaches, generating extensive documentation in a book, documentary film, and local and national press. Yet a close reading of the project and this multimedia record suggests a more complex—and often fraught—history of rehabilitation. Despite promising to pursue architectural and social interventions equally on a block struggling with poverty and drug addiction, backers came to prioritize the physical at the expense of the social. Moreover, in their drive to showcase the architectural transformation that provided the most compelling images of this as a model project, rehab supporters espoused a physically determinist view that architectural change was itself enough to solve difficult socioeconomic challenges. Rehabilitation thus ultimately repeated many of urban renewal's mistakes, leaving residents still struggling in homes whose physical improvements proved fleeting.
期刊介绍:
Buildings & Landscapes is the leading source for scholarly work on vernacular architecture of North America and beyond. The journal continues VAF’s tradition of scholarly publication going back to the first Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture in 1982. Published through the University of Minnesota Press since 2007, the journal moved from one to two issues per year in 2009. Buildings & Landscapes examines the places that people build and experience every day: houses and cities, farmsteads and alleys, churches and courthouses, subdivisions and shopping malls. The journal’s contributorsundefinedhistorians and architectural historians, preservationists and architects, geographers, anthropologists and folklorists, and others whose work involves documenting, analyzing, and interpreting vernacular formsundefinedapproach the built environment as a windows into human life and culture, basing their scholarship on both fieldwork and archival research. The editors encourage submission of articles that explore the ways the built environment shapes everyday life within and beyond North America.