一种仅用于断开连接文件访问的客户端方法

M. Mazer, J. Tardo
{"title":"一种仅用于断开连接文件访问的客户端方法","authors":"M. Mazer, J. Tardo","doi":"10.1109/MCSA.1994.512743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discusses a client-side-only approach to providing disconnected access to a heterogeneous set of network file services. Our method contrasts with those used in systems such as Coda, primarily because Coda depends upon changes to both the client software and the server software. Instead, we assume that we cannot make changes to the servers, and we explore the resultant benefits and limitations, as manifested in our prototype implementation. Unlike the LITTLE WORK approach to disconnected operation for the Andrew File System (AFS), we do not commit to a specific file access protocol; rather, we support access to multiple file services. We describe how a usability study affected our user model, system design and implementation.","PeriodicalId":88972,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications","volume":"17 1","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A client-side-only approach to disconnected file access\",\"authors\":\"M. Mazer, J. Tardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MCSA.1994.512743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discusses a client-side-only approach to providing disconnected access to a heterogeneous set of network file services. Our method contrasts with those used in systems such as Coda, primarily because Coda depends upon changes to both the client software and the server software. Instead, we assume that we cannot make changes to the servers, and we explore the resultant benefits and limitations, as manifested in our prototype implementation. Unlike the LITTLE WORK approach to disconnected operation for the Andrew File System (AFS), we do not commit to a specific file access protocol; rather, we support access to multiple file services. We describe how a usability study affected our user model, system design and implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"104-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSA.1994.512743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSA.1994.512743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

讨论一种仅用于提供对异构网络文件服务集的断开连接访问的客户端方法。我们的方法与Coda等系统中使用的方法形成对比,主要是因为Coda依赖于对客户端软件和服务器软件的更改。相反,我们假设不能对服务器进行更改,并探索由此产生的好处和限制,如我们的原型实现所示。不同于LITTLE WORK方法对安德鲁文件系统(AFS)的断开连接操作,我们不提交特定的文件访问协议;相反,我们支持访问多个文件服务。我们描述了可用性研究如何影响我们的用户模型、系统设计和实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A client-side-only approach to disconnected file access
Discusses a client-side-only approach to providing disconnected access to a heterogeneous set of network file services. Our method contrasts with those used in systems such as Coda, primarily because Coda depends upon changes to both the client software and the server software. Instead, we assume that we cannot make changes to the servers, and we explore the resultant benefits and limitations, as manifested in our prototype implementation. Unlike the LITTLE WORK approach to disconnected operation for the Andrew File System (AFS), we do not commit to a specific file access protocol; rather, we support access to multiple file services. We describe how a usability study affected our user model, system design and implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HotMobile '22: The 23rd International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Tempe, Arizona, USA, March 9 - 10, 2022 Splitting the bill for mobile data with SIMlets Quantifying the potential of ride-sharing using call description records Enabling the transition to the mobile web with WebSieve The case for psychological computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1