酯类刺激皮肤的构效关系模型的实验验证

Jeffrey S. Smith, O. Macina, N. Sussman, M. Karol, H. Maibach
{"title":"酯类刺激皮肤的构效关系模型的实验验证","authors":"Jeffrey S. Smith, O. Macina, N. Sussman, M. Karol, H. Maibach","doi":"10.1002/1521-3838(200012)19:5<467::AID-QSAR467>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SAR model development should be a continuous process involving formulation then experimental testing of the model, incorporation of test results into the database, then refinement of the model using the expanded database. The larger database affords greater confidence in its ability to predict the biological response. This iterative procedure was employed with a recently developed structure-activity relationship (SAR) model of human skin irritation. Based on a “leave-one-out” cross validation, the mean sensitivity of the initial model was 0.89, the mean specificity was 0.74. A clinical validation study was conducted to assess the ability of the model to predict human skin irritation by esters commonly used as fragrance ingredients. Esters that were found to cause irritation in rabbits, and that were within the predictive space of the SAR model, were selected for human testing using the patch test procedure. Of the 34 rabbit irritants selected, 16 were predicted by the model to be positive and 18 were predicted to be negative. Patch testing yielded two positive esters, allyl heptanoate and allyl cyclohexanepropionate. These test results were incorporated into the database to refine the SAR model. Best subsets regression and linear discriminant analysis were used to generate 10 submodels consisting of 10 irritants and 50 non-irritants randomly selected from the new database. Physicochemical parameters associated with irritant esters, when compared with non-irritant esters, differed somewhat from those identified in the original model. Irritant esters had lower solubility parameter and water solubility, higher Hansen dispersion and Hansen hydrogen bonding, and lower sum of partial positive charges, when compared with non-irritant esters. The sensitivity of the new model is 0.69 and specificity is 0.67. The results of this study indicate that SAR models based on limited data may not accurately predict the activity of unknown chemicals even though the computationally-derived sensitivity and specificity of the models are high. This finding emphasizes the need for experimental validation of models and their refinement as new data become available.","PeriodicalId":20818,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Validation of a Structure–Activity Relationship Model of Skin Irritation by Esters\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey S. Smith, O. Macina, N. Sussman, M. Karol, H. Maibach\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1521-3838(200012)19:5<467::AID-QSAR467>3.0.CO;2-#\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SAR model development should be a continuous process involving formulation then experimental testing of the model, incorporation of test results into the database, then refinement of the model using the expanded database. The larger database affords greater confidence in its ability to predict the biological response. This iterative procedure was employed with a recently developed structure-activity relationship (SAR) model of human skin irritation. Based on a “leave-one-out” cross validation, the mean sensitivity of the initial model was 0.89, the mean specificity was 0.74. A clinical validation study was conducted to assess the ability of the model to predict human skin irritation by esters commonly used as fragrance ingredients. Esters that were found to cause irritation in rabbits, and that were within the predictive space of the SAR model, were selected for human testing using the patch test procedure. Of the 34 rabbit irritants selected, 16 were predicted by the model to be positive and 18 were predicted to be negative. Patch testing yielded two positive esters, allyl heptanoate and allyl cyclohexanepropionate. These test results were incorporated into the database to refine the SAR model. Best subsets regression and linear discriminant analysis were used to generate 10 submodels consisting of 10 irritants and 50 non-irritants randomly selected from the new database. Physicochemical parameters associated with irritant esters, when compared with non-irritant esters, differed somewhat from those identified in the original model. Irritant esters had lower solubility parameter and water solubility, higher Hansen dispersion and Hansen hydrogen bonding, and lower sum of partial positive charges, when compared with non-irritant esters. The sensitivity of the new model is 0.69 and specificity is 0.67. The results of this study indicate that SAR models based on limited data may not accurately predict the activity of unknown chemicals even though the computationally-derived sensitivity and specificity of the models are high. This finding emphasizes the need for experimental validation of models and their refinement as new data become available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3838(200012)19:5<467::AID-QSAR467>3.0.CO;2-#\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3838(200012)19:5<467::AID-QSAR467>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

SAR模型的开发应该是一个持续的过程,包括模型的制定,然后对模型进行实验测试,将测试结果纳入数据库,然后使用扩展的数据库对模型进行改进。更大的数据库对其预测生物反应的能力提供了更大的信心。该迭代程序与最近开发的人体皮肤刺激结构-活性关系(SAR)模型相结合。基于“留一”交叉验证,初始模型的平均敏感性为0.89,平均特异性为0.74。进行了一项临床验证研究,以评估该模型预测通常用作香料成分的酯类对人体皮肤刺激的能力。在兔中发现引起刺激的酯,并且在SAR模型的预测空间内,选择使用斑贴试验程序进行人体试验。在选择的34种兔刺激物中,模型预测16种为阳性,18种为阴性。斑贴试验产生了两种阳性酯,庚酸烯丙酯和环己烯丙酸烯丙酯。这些测试结果被纳入数据库以改进SAR模型。采用最佳子集回归和线性判别分析,从新数据库中随机选择10种刺激物和50种非刺激物,生成10个子模型。与非刺激性酯相比,与刺激性酯相关的物理化学参数与原始模型中确定的有些不同。与非刺激性酯相比,刺激性酯具有较低的溶解度参数和水溶性,较高的汉森分散度和汉森氢键,以及较低的部分正电荷总和。新模型的敏感性为0.69,特异性为0.67。本研究的结果表明,基于有限数据的SAR模型可能无法准确预测未知化学物质的活性,尽管计算得出的模型的灵敏度和特异性很高。这一发现强调需要对模型进行实验验证,并在获得新数据时对其进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Validation of a Structure–Activity Relationship Model of Skin Irritation by Esters
SAR model development should be a continuous process involving formulation then experimental testing of the model, incorporation of test results into the database, then refinement of the model using the expanded database. The larger database affords greater confidence in its ability to predict the biological response. This iterative procedure was employed with a recently developed structure-activity relationship (SAR) model of human skin irritation. Based on a “leave-one-out” cross validation, the mean sensitivity of the initial model was 0.89, the mean specificity was 0.74. A clinical validation study was conducted to assess the ability of the model to predict human skin irritation by esters commonly used as fragrance ingredients. Esters that were found to cause irritation in rabbits, and that were within the predictive space of the SAR model, were selected for human testing using the patch test procedure. Of the 34 rabbit irritants selected, 16 were predicted by the model to be positive and 18 were predicted to be negative. Patch testing yielded two positive esters, allyl heptanoate and allyl cyclohexanepropionate. These test results were incorporated into the database to refine the SAR model. Best subsets regression and linear discriminant analysis were used to generate 10 submodels consisting of 10 irritants and 50 non-irritants randomly selected from the new database. Physicochemical parameters associated with irritant esters, when compared with non-irritant esters, differed somewhat from those identified in the original model. Irritant esters had lower solubility parameter and water solubility, higher Hansen dispersion and Hansen hydrogen bonding, and lower sum of partial positive charges, when compared with non-irritant esters. The sensitivity of the new model is 0.69 and specificity is 0.67. The results of this study indicate that SAR models based on limited data may not accurately predict the activity of unknown chemicals even though the computationally-derived sensitivity and specificity of the models are high. This finding emphasizes the need for experimental validation of models and their refinement as new data become available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts of publications related to QASR Mechanistic Study on N‐Demethylation Catalyzed with P450 by Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship using Electronic Properties of 4‐Substituted N,N‐Dimethylaniline 3D QSAR of Serotonin Transporter Ligands: CoMFA and CoMSIA Studies Scaffold Searching: Automated Identification of Similar Ring Systems for the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Theoretical Prediction of the Phenoxyl Radical Formation Capacity and Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Relationships by Phenolic Compounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1