Rafael Cavalcante Silva, José Mariani Jr., Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão, Antonio Esteves Filho, Cesar Higa Nomura, Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José Rodrigues Parga, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto
{"title":"经皮导管主动脉瓣假体植入患者计算机断层摄影术中主动脉瓣环收缩和舒张尺寸的差异","authors":"Rafael Cavalcante Silva, José Mariani Jr., Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão, Antonio Esteves Filho, Cesar Higa Nomura, Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José Rodrigues Parga, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurate aortic valve annulus sizing has critical importance for the planning of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Although there is a recommendation to perform the measurement during systole, little is known about the importance of the differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the annulus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients referred for TAVI were evaluated with computed tomography for valve annulus sizing during systole and diastole. Area, circumference, minimum and maximum diameters, and their mean derived diameters were obtained in both phases of the cardiac cycle. Bland‐Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the differences between the measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis included 41 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mean area, circumference, and diameters were slightly greater in systole. However, in 35% of patients, diastolic dimensions were greater. These differences, although statistically significant, were small (the greatest difference of 0.6<!--> <!-->mm in mean diameter). Bland‐Altman plots showed good agreement between systolic and diastolic measurements on all parameters evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Small differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus with computed tomography scan, which, although statistically significant, probably do not impact the selection of prosthesis or the procedure outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101093,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 130-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diferenças entre as dimensões sistólica e diastólica do anel valvar aórtico na angiotomografia computadorizada em pacientes submetidos a implante percutâneo de prótese valvar aórtica por cateter\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Cavalcante Silva, José Mariani Jr., Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão, Antonio Esteves Filho, Cesar Higa Nomura, Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila, José Rodrigues Parga, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurate aortic valve annulus sizing has critical importance for the planning of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Although there is a recommendation to perform the measurement during systole, little is known about the importance of the differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the annulus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients referred for TAVI were evaluated with computed tomography for valve annulus sizing during systole and diastole. Area, circumference, minimum and maximum diameters, and their mean derived diameters were obtained in both phases of the cardiac cycle. Bland‐Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the differences between the measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis included 41 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mean area, circumference, and diameters were slightly greater in systole. However, in 35% of patients, diastolic dimensions were greater. These differences, although statistically significant, were small (the greatest difference of 0.6<!--> <!-->mm in mean diameter). Bland‐Altman plots showed good agreement between systolic and diastolic measurements on all parameters evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Small differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus with computed tomography scan, which, although statistically significant, probably do not impact the selection of prosthesis or the procedure outcome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 130-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104184315000442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104184315000442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diferenças entre as dimensões sistólica e diastólica do anel valvar aórtico na angiotomografia computadorizada em pacientes submetidos a implante percutâneo de prótese valvar aórtica por cateter
Background
Accurate aortic valve annulus sizing has critical importance for the planning of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Although there is a recommendation to perform the measurement during systole, little is known about the importance of the differences between systolic and diastolic dimensions of the annulus.
Methods
Consecutive patients referred for TAVI were evaluated with computed tomography for valve annulus sizing during systole and diastole. Area, circumference, minimum and maximum diameters, and their mean derived diameters were obtained in both phases of the cardiac cycle. Bland‐Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the differences between the measures.
Results
The analysis included 41 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Mean area, circumference, and diameters were slightly greater in systole. However, in 35% of patients, diastolic dimensions were greater. These differences, although statistically significant, were small (the greatest difference of 0.6 mm in mean diameter). Bland‐Altman plots showed good agreement between systolic and diastolic measurements on all parameters evaluated.
Conclusions
Small differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic dimensions of the aortic valve annulus with computed tomography scan, which, although statistically significant, probably do not impact the selection of prosthesis or the procedure outcome.