“我们控制了引擎,我们就控制了世界”:跨国电影中关于性别、国家和劳工的地缘政治

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Transnational Screens Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/25785273.2019.1665966
D. Schwartz
{"title":"“我们控制了引擎,我们就控制了世界”:跨国电影中关于性别、国家和劳工的地缘政治","authors":"D. Schwartz","doi":"10.1080/25785273.2019.1665966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Western academe conceptualizes neoliberalism as a political theory of capitalism’s expansion into all facets of being, homogenizing neoliberalism’s disparate geopolitical operations on gendered subjects. Transnational film studies attempts an intervention, reclaiming questions of production and authorship alongside consumption and desire, accounting for globalization’s shifting landscape. Some scholars call for critical understandings of ‘transnational’, highlightingpower imbalances in transnational exchanges at sites of production, distribution, and exhibition. Neoliberalism efface gendered, racialized, and nationalized power relations at the site of labour, while arguments in transnational film studies efface geopolitical unevenness in transnational filmmaking and theoretical conceptualizations of the transnational. The industrial circumstances of Slumdog Millionaire and Snowpiercer are ripe for illuminating neoliberalism’s uneven gendered effects on divided subjects and nations. Hard to place within clear national borders textually and industrially, these films share precarious positions on global markets geopolitically. A methodology highlighting geopolitical unevenness across industries relationally is necessary for closely attending to sites of reception and stardom beyond the box office, including sites of production, distribution, and text. Examining spatiotemporal formations in these films and their paratexts troubles neoliberalism’s emphasis on spatial division. Reading these films from multiple sites proves useful for tracing geopolitical entanglements and particularities of neoliberalism’s divergent processes and effects.","PeriodicalId":36578,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Screens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘We control the engine, we control the world’: the geopolitics of gender, nation, and labour in hard-to-place transnational films\",\"authors\":\"D. Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785273.2019.1665966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Western academe conceptualizes neoliberalism as a political theory of capitalism’s expansion into all facets of being, homogenizing neoliberalism’s disparate geopolitical operations on gendered subjects. Transnational film studies attempts an intervention, reclaiming questions of production and authorship alongside consumption and desire, accounting for globalization’s shifting landscape. Some scholars call for critical understandings of ‘transnational’, highlightingpower imbalances in transnational exchanges at sites of production, distribution, and exhibition. Neoliberalism efface gendered, racialized, and nationalized power relations at the site of labour, while arguments in transnational film studies efface geopolitical unevenness in transnational filmmaking and theoretical conceptualizations of the transnational. The industrial circumstances of Slumdog Millionaire and Snowpiercer are ripe for illuminating neoliberalism’s uneven gendered effects on divided subjects and nations. Hard to place within clear national borders textually and industrially, these films share precarious positions on global markets geopolitically. A methodology highlighting geopolitical unevenness across industries relationally is necessary for closely attending to sites of reception and stardom beyond the box office, including sites of production, distribution, and text. Examining spatiotemporal formations in these films and their paratexts troubles neoliberalism’s emphasis on spatial division. Reading these films from multiple sites proves useful for tracing geopolitical entanglements and particularities of neoliberalism’s divergent processes and effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Screens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Screens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785273.2019.1665966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Screens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785273.2019.1665966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西方学术界将新自由主义定义为资本主义向存在的各个方面扩张的政治理论,将新自由主义在性别主体上的不同地缘政治操作同质化。跨国电影研究试图进行干预,在消费和欲望的同时,重新提出生产和作者的问题,解释全球化不断变化的景观。一些学者呼吁批判性地理解“跨国”,强调在生产、分销和展览场所的跨国交流中的权力不平衡。新自由主义抹去了劳动现场的性别、种族化和国有化的权力关系,而跨国电影研究中的争论则抹去了跨国电影制作中的地缘政治不平衡和跨国的理论概念化。《贫民窟的百万富翁》和《雪国列车》的工业环境已经成熟,可以用来说明新自由主义对分裂的主体和国家的不平衡的性别影响。这些电影在文本和工业上都难以划入明确的国界,它们在全球地缘政治市场上的地位岌岌可危。为了密切关注票房之外的接待和明星地点,包括制作、发行和文本地点,有必要采用一种强调不同行业之间地缘政治不平衡的方法。检视这些电影及其准文本中的时空构成,会困扰新自由主义对空间划分的强调。从多个地点阅读这些电影,有助于追踪新自由主义不同过程和影响的地缘政治纠葛和特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘We control the engine, we control the world’: the geopolitics of gender, nation, and labour in hard-to-place transnational films
ABSTRACT Western academe conceptualizes neoliberalism as a political theory of capitalism’s expansion into all facets of being, homogenizing neoliberalism’s disparate geopolitical operations on gendered subjects. Transnational film studies attempts an intervention, reclaiming questions of production and authorship alongside consumption and desire, accounting for globalization’s shifting landscape. Some scholars call for critical understandings of ‘transnational’, highlightingpower imbalances in transnational exchanges at sites of production, distribution, and exhibition. Neoliberalism efface gendered, racialized, and nationalized power relations at the site of labour, while arguments in transnational film studies efface geopolitical unevenness in transnational filmmaking and theoretical conceptualizations of the transnational. The industrial circumstances of Slumdog Millionaire and Snowpiercer are ripe for illuminating neoliberalism’s uneven gendered effects on divided subjects and nations. Hard to place within clear national borders textually and industrially, these films share precarious positions on global markets geopolitically. A methodology highlighting geopolitical unevenness across industries relationally is necessary for closely attending to sites of reception and stardom beyond the box office, including sites of production, distribution, and text. Examining spatiotemporal formations in these films and their paratexts troubles neoliberalism’s emphasis on spatial division. Reading these films from multiple sites proves useful for tracing geopolitical entanglements and particularities of neoliberalism’s divergent processes and effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Screens
Transnational Screens Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The recent Sino-Danish film co-productions: soft power and transnational talent development The role of Sino-Arab film collaboration on cultural diplomacy during the ‘Seventeen Years’ Sino-international film collaboration and co-production: policy and practice Jeffrey Lau’s journey to the mainland: strategic hybridization in Hong Kong-mainland film co-production Science fiction cinema in the twenty-first century: transnational futures, cosmopolitan concerns Science fiction cinema in the twenty-first century: transnational futures, cosmopolitan concerns , Pablo Gómez-Muñoz, Abingdon, Routledge, 2023, xi, 1–181 pp., Paperback, £37.99, ISBN 978–0–367–75906–3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1