20世纪90年代和21世纪初发达国家的银行危机:它们有多相似?

Thouraya Boudebbous
{"title":"20世纪90年代和21世纪初发达国家的银行危机:它们有多相似?","authors":"Thouraya Boudebbous","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS15526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)IntroductionThe global financial system experienced a serious crisis in July 2007. This crisis, initially affecting the American housing market, gradually spread to the entire global financial system. The crisis not only caused the default of some of the world's largest banking institutions, but was also at the root of a worldwide financial crisis comparable to that of the Great Depression of 1929.The 2007-2008 banking crises have been the subject of numerous controversies as to their similarities and differences to past banking crises. Some claim that the recent crises are different in every aspect. They are chiefly due to a global savings glut and the absence of shadow banking system regulation (Adrian and Shin, 2009). Others maintain that the recent episodes of banking distress are not so different from the previous ones and that the latter show remarkable similarities to the former. According to Claessens and al. (2010b), these similarities are: First, the price of real and financial assets rising considerably in a number of countries before the crisis, notably in the United States and Europe. These prices reached 60% before the start of the crisis, which strongly recalls the price spike observed during major financial crises of the '90s, notably the Japanese crisis of 1997 (Caballero, 2010). A second similarity is the occurrence, in a number of major economies, of credit booms before the crisis, estimated at over 150% of GDP (Claessens and al., 2010b). Third, international financial integration facilitated large capital inflows, which contributed to the acceleration of GDP growth and massive credit growth, which in turn led to a strong fluctuation of global demand and a strong deterioration of current bank balances during the period preceding the crisis (Cardarelli and al., 2010). Fourth, the inadequacy of the regulation and prudential supervision framework (Bair, 2009).In light of these findings, the goal of this study is twofold. First, to determine if the banking crises of the 2000s have shared causes with the crises of the 90s, and second, to determine if aggregated accounting indicators are robust banking crisis indicators.Thus, in this study we propose first to identify banking crisis indicators by means of a limited dependent logit approach for a cross-sectional view of advanced economies during the period preceding the 2007-2008 banking crises, namely 1990-2006, and the period 2007-2012. Second, we propose to test the robustness of the results derived from the multivariate logit approach, by means of Bayesian statistics (BMA). Indeed, according to Cuaresma and Slacik (2009) and Babecký and al. (2012), the BMA approach has the advantage of reviewing different model combinations and of weighting them according to their adjustments in the model.This paper will be organized as follows: The first section being an introduction, in the second section we briefly present a review of the literature on banking crisis indicators. In the third section, we present our methodology, namely: our country sample and our main data sources, our endogenous and exogenous variables, and our two econometric approaches. In the fourth section, we present a brief descriptive analysis of our data. We describe and discuss in the fifth section our empirical results. The last section is the conclusion.Financial Crisis Indicators: Review of the LiteratureBanking crises are not limited to the 21st century. Indeed, during the past four decades, the global economy was marked by an increase in banking crises. According to Reinhart and Rogoff (2013), banking crises represent a threat to equal opportunity amongst emergent and advanced economies: most countries have had at least one banking crisis during the period of 1945-2008.The reoccurrence of these crises, their magnitudes and their surprising and unpredictable character, and the financial costs associated with these episodes explain the research communities' interest in these events. …","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Banking Crises of the 1990s and 2000s in Developed Countries: How Similar Are They?\",\"authors\":\"Thouraya Boudebbous\",\"doi\":\"10.14706/JECOSS15526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)IntroductionThe global financial system experienced a serious crisis in July 2007. This crisis, initially affecting the American housing market, gradually spread to the entire global financial system. The crisis not only caused the default of some of the world's largest banking institutions, but was also at the root of a worldwide financial crisis comparable to that of the Great Depression of 1929.The 2007-2008 banking crises have been the subject of numerous controversies as to their similarities and differences to past banking crises. Some claim that the recent crises are different in every aspect. They are chiefly due to a global savings glut and the absence of shadow banking system regulation (Adrian and Shin, 2009). Others maintain that the recent episodes of banking distress are not so different from the previous ones and that the latter show remarkable similarities to the former. According to Claessens and al. (2010b), these similarities are: First, the price of real and financial assets rising considerably in a number of countries before the crisis, notably in the United States and Europe. These prices reached 60% before the start of the crisis, which strongly recalls the price spike observed during major financial crises of the '90s, notably the Japanese crisis of 1997 (Caballero, 2010). A second similarity is the occurrence, in a number of major economies, of credit booms before the crisis, estimated at over 150% of GDP (Claessens and al., 2010b). Third, international financial integration facilitated large capital inflows, which contributed to the acceleration of GDP growth and massive credit growth, which in turn led to a strong fluctuation of global demand and a strong deterioration of current bank balances during the period preceding the crisis (Cardarelli and al., 2010). Fourth, the inadequacy of the regulation and prudential supervision framework (Bair, 2009).In light of these findings, the goal of this study is twofold. First, to determine if the banking crises of the 2000s have shared causes with the crises of the 90s, and second, to determine if aggregated accounting indicators are robust banking crisis indicators.Thus, in this study we propose first to identify banking crisis indicators by means of a limited dependent logit approach for a cross-sectional view of advanced economies during the period preceding the 2007-2008 banking crises, namely 1990-2006, and the period 2007-2012. Second, we propose to test the robustness of the results derived from the multivariate logit approach, by means of Bayesian statistics (BMA). Indeed, according to Cuaresma and Slacik (2009) and Babecký and al. (2012), the BMA approach has the advantage of reviewing different model combinations and of weighting them according to their adjustments in the model.This paper will be organized as follows: The first section being an introduction, in the second section we briefly present a review of the literature on banking crisis indicators. In the third section, we present our methodology, namely: our country sample and our main data sources, our endogenous and exogenous variables, and our two econometric approaches. In the fourth section, we present a brief descriptive analysis of our data. We describe and discuss in the fifth section our empirical results. The last section is the conclusion.Financial Crisis Indicators: Review of the LiteratureBanking crises are not limited to the 21st century. Indeed, during the past four decades, the global economy was marked by an increase in banking crises. According to Reinhart and Rogoff (2013), banking crises represent a threat to equal opportunity amongst emergent and advanced economies: most countries have had at least one banking crisis during the period of 1945-2008.The reoccurrence of these crises, their magnitudes and their surprising and unpredictable character, and the financial costs associated with these episodes explain the research communities' interest in these events. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":52427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS15526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS15526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(ProQuest:……表示省略公式。)2007年7月,全球金融体系经历了一场严重的危机。这场危机,最初影响到美国房地产市场,逐渐蔓延到整个全球金融体系。这场危机不仅导致了一些世界上最大的银行机构违约,而且也是一场堪比1929年大萧条的全球性金融危机的根源。2007-2008年的银行危机与以往的银行危机的相似之处和不同之处一直是众多争议的主题。一些人声称,最近的危机在各个方面都不同。它们主要是由于全球储蓄过剩和影子银行系统监管的缺失(Adrian和Shin, 2009)。另一些人则坚持认为,最近几次银行业危机与之前几次没有太大不同,而后者与前者有着惊人的相似之处。根据Claessens等人(2010b)的研究,这些相似之处是:首先,在危机前,许多国家的实物和金融资产价格大幅上涨,尤其是在美国和欧洲。这些价格在危机开始前达到了60%,这让人想起了90年代主要金融危机期间的价格飙升,尤其是1997年的日本危机(Caballero, 2010)。第二个相似之处是,在危机前,许多主要经济体都出现了信贷繁荣,估计超过GDP的150% (Claessens等,2010b)。第三,国际金融一体化促进了大量资本流入,这促进了GDP增长的加速和信贷的大规模增长,这反过来又导致了全球需求的剧烈波动和当前银行余额在危机前的严重恶化(Cardarelli等人,2010年)。第四,监管和审慎监管框架的不足(Bair, 2009)。鉴于这些发现,这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,确定本世纪头十年的银行业危机是否与上世纪90年代的危机有共同的原因;其次,确定汇总会计指标是否是稳健的银行业危机指标。因此,在本研究中,我们建议首先通过有限依赖逻辑方法对2007-2008年银行危机之前的发达经济体(即1990-2006年和2007-2012年)的横截面视图确定银行危机指标。其次,我们建议通过贝叶斯统计(BMA)来检验多元logit方法得出的结果的稳健性。事实上,根据Cuaresma和Slacik(2009)以及Babecký和al.(2012)的研究,BMA方法具有审查不同模型组合并根据其在模型中的调整对其进行加权的优势。本文将组织如下:第一部分是一个介绍,在第二部分中,我们简要地介绍了银行业危机指标的文献综述。在第三部分,我们介绍了我们的方法,即:我们的国家样本和我们的主要数据来源,我们的内生和外生变量,以及我们的两种计量经济学方法。在第四部分中,我们对我们的数据进行了简要的描述性分析。我们在第五部分描述和讨论了我们的实证结果。最后是结论部分。金融危机指标:文献综述银行危机并不局限于21世纪。事实上,在过去40年里,全球经济的特点是银行业危机的增加。根据Reinhart和Rogoff(2013)的观点,银行业危机对新兴经济体和发达经济体的机会均等构成了威胁:1945年至2008年期间,大多数国家至少发生过一次银行业危机。这些危机的反复出现、它们的规模、令人惊讶和不可预测的特征,以及与这些事件相关的经济成本,解释了研究界对这些事件的兴趣。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Banking Crises of the 1990s and 2000s in Developed Countries: How Similar Are They?
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)IntroductionThe global financial system experienced a serious crisis in July 2007. This crisis, initially affecting the American housing market, gradually spread to the entire global financial system. The crisis not only caused the default of some of the world's largest banking institutions, but was also at the root of a worldwide financial crisis comparable to that of the Great Depression of 1929.The 2007-2008 banking crises have been the subject of numerous controversies as to their similarities and differences to past banking crises. Some claim that the recent crises are different in every aspect. They are chiefly due to a global savings glut and the absence of shadow banking system regulation (Adrian and Shin, 2009). Others maintain that the recent episodes of banking distress are not so different from the previous ones and that the latter show remarkable similarities to the former. According to Claessens and al. (2010b), these similarities are: First, the price of real and financial assets rising considerably in a number of countries before the crisis, notably in the United States and Europe. These prices reached 60% before the start of the crisis, which strongly recalls the price spike observed during major financial crises of the '90s, notably the Japanese crisis of 1997 (Caballero, 2010). A second similarity is the occurrence, in a number of major economies, of credit booms before the crisis, estimated at over 150% of GDP (Claessens and al., 2010b). Third, international financial integration facilitated large capital inflows, which contributed to the acceleration of GDP growth and massive credit growth, which in turn led to a strong fluctuation of global demand and a strong deterioration of current bank balances during the period preceding the crisis (Cardarelli and al., 2010). Fourth, the inadequacy of the regulation and prudential supervision framework (Bair, 2009).In light of these findings, the goal of this study is twofold. First, to determine if the banking crises of the 2000s have shared causes with the crises of the 90s, and second, to determine if aggregated accounting indicators are robust banking crisis indicators.Thus, in this study we propose first to identify banking crisis indicators by means of a limited dependent logit approach for a cross-sectional view of advanced economies during the period preceding the 2007-2008 banking crises, namely 1990-2006, and the period 2007-2012. Second, we propose to test the robustness of the results derived from the multivariate logit approach, by means of Bayesian statistics (BMA). Indeed, according to Cuaresma and Slacik (2009) and Babecký and al. (2012), the BMA approach has the advantage of reviewing different model combinations and of weighting them according to their adjustments in the model.This paper will be organized as follows: The first section being an introduction, in the second section we briefly present a review of the literature on banking crisis indicators. In the third section, we present our methodology, namely: our country sample and our main data sources, our endogenous and exogenous variables, and our two econometric approaches. In the fourth section, we present a brief descriptive analysis of our data. We describe and discuss in the fifth section our empirical results. The last section is the conclusion.Financial Crisis Indicators: Review of the LiteratureBanking crises are not limited to the 21st century. Indeed, during the past four decades, the global economy was marked by an increase in banking crises. According to Reinhart and Rogoff (2013), banking crises represent a threat to equal opportunity amongst emergent and advanced economies: most countries have had at least one banking crisis during the period of 1945-2008.The reoccurrence of these crises, their magnitudes and their surprising and unpredictable character, and the financial costs associated with these episodes explain the research communities' interest in these events. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE USE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES Effect of fiscal expansion on inflation during the period of unconventional monetary policy Causes and Consequences of the World Financial Crisis 2008: A Historical Perspective The Investments Efficiency Toward Economic Growth: ICOR of the Republic of Croatia and Slovenia - Comparative Analysis India and China in the Indian Ocean: Changing Dimensions of Maritime Strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1