基于空间指数的南非豪登省动态种族居住隔离测度

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY South African Geographical Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1080/03736245.2021.1997793
S. Katumba, S. Coetzee, A. Stein, I. Fabris-Rotelli
{"title":"基于空间指数的南非豪登省动态种族居住隔离测度","authors":"S. Katumba, S. Coetzee, A. Stein, I. Fabris-Rotelli","doi":"10.1080/03736245.2021.1997793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Apartheid laws resulted in racial residential segregation that became entrenched into the urban morphology of South Africa. When apar-theid ended in the 1990’s, the new South African democratic government was resolved to bring about social and spatial justice, address inequalities and promote social cohesion. To determine progress towards racial residential integration, aspatial indices of segregation are widely employed despite their shortcomings and limi-tations. This study employs two spatial indices of segregation: the spatial information theory index and the spatial exposure/isolation index in order to measure and quantify the levels of racial residential segregation that individuals living in Gauteng province (South Africa) would experience on average within radii of 500m, 4km and 8km of their respective residential locations. The analysis is based on the 1996, 2001 and 2011 Census data. The results indicate that the levels of racial residential segregation have steadily declined between 1996 and 2011. The levels of exposure of Whites to Black Africans continue to increase while the levels of exposure of Black Africans to Whites have remained unchanged over the same period. These observations are true for the different geographic scales (i.e. within radii of 500m, 4km and 8km) of analysis considered in this study.","PeriodicalId":46279,"journal":{"name":"South African Geographical Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"1 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using spatial indices to measure dynamic racial residential segregation in Gauteng province (South Africa)\",\"authors\":\"S. Katumba, S. Coetzee, A. Stein, I. Fabris-Rotelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03736245.2021.1997793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Apartheid laws resulted in racial residential segregation that became entrenched into the urban morphology of South Africa. When apar-theid ended in the 1990’s, the new South African democratic government was resolved to bring about social and spatial justice, address inequalities and promote social cohesion. To determine progress towards racial residential integration, aspatial indices of segregation are widely employed despite their shortcomings and limi-tations. This study employs two spatial indices of segregation: the spatial information theory index and the spatial exposure/isolation index in order to measure and quantify the levels of racial residential segregation that individuals living in Gauteng province (South Africa) would experience on average within radii of 500m, 4km and 8km of their respective residential locations. The analysis is based on the 1996, 2001 and 2011 Census data. The results indicate that the levels of racial residential segregation have steadily declined between 1996 and 2011. The levels of exposure of Whites to Black Africans continue to increase while the levels of exposure of Black Africans to Whites have remained unchanged over the same period. These observations are true for the different geographic scales (i.e. within radii of 500m, 4km and 8km) of analysis considered in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Geographical Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Geographical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2021.1997793\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2021.1997793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种族隔离法律导致了种族居住隔离,这种隔离在南非的城市形态中根深蒂固。当种族隔离在20世纪90年代结束时,新的南非民主政府决心实现社会和空间正义,解决不平等问题,促进社会凝聚力。为了确定种族居住融合的进展,尽管空间隔离指数存在缺点和局限性,但仍被广泛采用。本研究采用两个空间隔离指数:空间信息理论指数和空间暴露/隔离指数,以衡量和量化居住在豪登省(南非)的个人在其各自居住地的500米、4公里和8公里半径内平均经历的种族居住隔离水平。该分析基于1996年、2001年和2011年的人口普查数据。结果表明,1996年至2011年间,种族居住隔离水平稳步下降。白人对非洲黑人的接触水平继续增加,而非洲黑人对白人的接触水平在同一时期保持不变。这些观测结果适用于本研究中考虑的不同地理尺度(即在500米、4公里和8公里半径范围内)的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using spatial indices to measure dynamic racial residential segregation in Gauteng province (South Africa)
ABSTRACT Apartheid laws resulted in racial residential segregation that became entrenched into the urban morphology of South Africa. When apar-theid ended in the 1990’s, the new South African democratic government was resolved to bring about social and spatial justice, address inequalities and promote social cohesion. To determine progress towards racial residential integration, aspatial indices of segregation are widely employed despite their shortcomings and limi-tations. This study employs two spatial indices of segregation: the spatial information theory index and the spatial exposure/isolation index in order to measure and quantify the levels of racial residential segregation that individuals living in Gauteng province (South Africa) would experience on average within radii of 500m, 4km and 8km of their respective residential locations. The analysis is based on the 1996, 2001 and 2011 Census data. The results indicate that the levels of racial residential segregation have steadily declined between 1996 and 2011. The levels of exposure of Whites to Black Africans continue to increase while the levels of exposure of Black Africans to Whites have remained unchanged over the same period. These observations are true for the different geographic scales (i.e. within radii of 500m, 4km and 8km) of analysis considered in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The South African Geographical Journal was founded in 1917 and is the flagship journal of the Society of South African Geographers. The journal aims at using southern Africa as a region from, and through, which to communicate geographic knowledge and to engage with issues and themes relevant to the discipline. The journal is a forum for papers of a high academic quality and welcomes papers dealing with philosophical and methodological issues and topics of an international scope that are significant for the region and the African continent, including: Climate change Environmental studies Development Governance and policy Physical and urban Geography Human Geography Sustainability Tourism GIS and remote sensing
期刊最新文献
An Assessment of urban greening challenges and opportunities associated with urban densification in the EThekwini Municipality Socio-spatial small town dynamics in South Africa Socio-spatial small town dynamics in South Africa , edited by R. Donaldson, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2023, 242 pp., £139.99 (hardcover), ISBN 978-3-031-37141-7 Spatiotemporal analysis of heavy summer rainfall events across the Free State Province, South Africa: 1981–2022 Digitally mapping soil carbon of the uThukela headwater catchment in the Maloti-Drakensberg, a remote Afromontane mountain region Taking a back seat: the politicization of municipal environmental governance in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1