旋转血栓弹性测量法鉴别脓毒症预防性无分离肝素输注的效果

M. Nouri, Elchin Barzegar, A. Ahmadi, F. Etezadi, M. Mojtahedzadeh
{"title":"旋转血栓弹性测量法鉴别脓毒症预防性无分离肝素输注的效果","authors":"M. Nouri, Elchin Barzegar, A. Ahmadi, F. Etezadi, M. Mojtahedzadeh","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Coagulation abnormalities are relatively common among septic patients. The standard of care for preventing thrombosis in critically ill patients is subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin 2 or 3 times a day, which fails in some cases. We studied the influence of continuous intravenous infusion of equivalent doses on coagulation profile using rotational thromboelastometry. Subjects and Methods Patients were randomly allocated to the subcutaneous group (n = 15) or infusion group (n = 15). The subcutaneous group received 5000 units 3 times a day, whereas the infusion group received heparin 500 units/hour intravenously. Results Clotting times were significantly lower in the infusion group compared with the subcutaneous group on days 2 and 7 (P < 0.05). Clot formation times were also significantly lower in the infusion group both on days 2 and 7 (P < 0.05). Conclusions Intravenous infusion of low-dose heparin might provide more efficient thromboprophylaxis in septic patients. This method could be used in those who are at higher risk of thrombosis.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating the Effects of Prophylactic Unfractionated Heparin Infusion by Rotational Thromboelastometry in Sepsis\",\"authors\":\"M. Nouri, Elchin Barzegar, A. Ahmadi, F. Etezadi, M. Mojtahedzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0000000000000162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims Coagulation abnormalities are relatively common among septic patients. The standard of care for preventing thrombosis in critically ill patients is subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin 2 or 3 times a day, which fails in some cases. We studied the influence of continuous intravenous infusion of equivalent doses on coagulation profile using rotational thromboelastometry. Subjects and Methods Patients were randomly allocated to the subcutaneous group (n = 15) or infusion group (n = 15). The subcutaneous group received 5000 units 3 times a day, whereas the infusion group received heparin 500 units/hour intravenously. Results Clotting times were significantly lower in the infusion group compared with the subcutaneous group on days 2 and 7 (P < 0.05). Clot formation times were also significantly lower in the infusion group both on days 2 and 7 (P < 0.05). Conclusions Intravenous infusion of low-dose heparin might provide more efficient thromboprophylaxis in septic patients. This method could be used in those who are at higher risk of thrombosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的凝血功能异常在脓毒症患者中较为常见。预防危重患者血栓形成的标准护理是每天皮下注射2或3次无分离肝素,但在某些情况下无效。我们使用旋转血栓弹性测量法研究了等量连续静脉输注对凝血特性的影响。患者随机分为皮下注射组(n = 15)和输液组(n = 15)。皮下注射组给予肝素5000单位,每日3次,静脉注射组给予肝素500单位/小时。结果输液组第2、7天凝血时间明显低于皮下组(P < 0.05)。输液组在第2天、第7天的凝块形成时间也显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论静脉滴注低剂量肝素可有效预防脓毒症患者血栓形成。这种方法可用于血栓形成风险较高的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentiating the Effects of Prophylactic Unfractionated Heparin Infusion by Rotational Thromboelastometry in Sepsis
Background and Aims Coagulation abnormalities are relatively common among septic patients. The standard of care for preventing thrombosis in critically ill patients is subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin 2 or 3 times a day, which fails in some cases. We studied the influence of continuous intravenous infusion of equivalent doses on coagulation profile using rotational thromboelastometry. Subjects and Methods Patients were randomly allocated to the subcutaneous group (n = 15) or infusion group (n = 15). The subcutaneous group received 5000 units 3 times a day, whereas the infusion group received heparin 500 units/hour intravenously. Results Clotting times were significantly lower in the infusion group compared with the subcutaneous group on days 2 and 7 (P < 0.05). Clot formation times were also significantly lower in the infusion group both on days 2 and 7 (P < 0.05). Conclusions Intravenous infusion of low-dose heparin might provide more efficient thromboprophylaxis in septic patients. This method could be used in those who are at higher risk of thrombosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1