评价学习在教师教育中的作用:认知信念的作用

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Educational and Developmental Psychologist Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1080/20590776.2022.2121160
Mike Yough, D. Tan, Heather N. Fedesco, H. Cho
{"title":"评价学习在教师教育中的作用:认知信念的作用","authors":"Mike Yough, D. Tan, Heather N. Fedesco, H. Cho","doi":"10.1080/20590776.2022.2121160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Being skilled in the development and use of assessments is crucial if teachers are to know whether their students are meeting learning objectives. Unfortunately, many preservice teachers hold beliefs at odds with views that are adaptive for the promotion of learning. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore the relationships between epistemic beliefs and preservice teachers’ understanding of foundational concepts of assessment. Method Participants were 282 undergraduate students enrolled in an educational psychology course. Multiple regression was used to examine these relationships followed by a deductive analysis of field journal entries. Results Results revealed a relationship between epistemic beliefs and understanding of assessment. Those with beliefs in knowledge as more fluid and evolving made more connections between the course and their field experience and demonstrated greater understanding of foundational concepts. Conclusions Our findings suggest that teacher education programs should be structured in ways to promote these beliefs. Such beliefs may result in more effective teaching and assessment practices more congruent with the promotion of meaningful learning amongst the next generation of students. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Epistemic beliefs play a role in what is learned. (2) Epistemic beliefs are associated with metacognitive strategy use, reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, creativity, and motivation. (3) Assessment practices can shape students’ beliefs about the nature of knowledge. What this study adds: (1) A mixed-methods examination of epistemic beliefs in teacher education. (2) Quantitative results reveal epistemic beliefs significantly contribute to the variance in preservice teachers learning of foundation concepts of assessment. (3) Qualitative results reveal students with more epistemic beliefs are more likely to make connections between coursework and field experiences.","PeriodicalId":44410,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","volume":"33 1","pages":"151 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning of assessment in teacher education: the role of epistemic beliefs\",\"authors\":\"Mike Yough, D. Tan, Heather N. Fedesco, H. Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20590776.2022.2121160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective Being skilled in the development and use of assessments is crucial if teachers are to know whether their students are meeting learning objectives. Unfortunately, many preservice teachers hold beliefs at odds with views that are adaptive for the promotion of learning. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore the relationships between epistemic beliefs and preservice teachers’ understanding of foundational concepts of assessment. Method Participants were 282 undergraduate students enrolled in an educational psychology course. Multiple regression was used to examine these relationships followed by a deductive analysis of field journal entries. Results Results revealed a relationship between epistemic beliefs and understanding of assessment. Those with beliefs in knowledge as more fluid and evolving made more connections between the course and their field experience and demonstrated greater understanding of foundational concepts. Conclusions Our findings suggest that teacher education programs should be structured in ways to promote these beliefs. Such beliefs may result in more effective teaching and assessment practices more congruent with the promotion of meaningful learning amongst the next generation of students. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Epistemic beliefs play a role in what is learned. (2) Epistemic beliefs are associated with metacognitive strategy use, reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, creativity, and motivation. (3) Assessment practices can shape students’ beliefs about the nature of knowledge. What this study adds: (1) A mixed-methods examination of epistemic beliefs in teacher education. (2) Quantitative results reveal epistemic beliefs significantly contribute to the variance in preservice teachers learning of foundation concepts of assessment. (3) Qualitative results reveal students with more epistemic beliefs are more likely to make connections between coursework and field experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"151 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational and Developmental Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2121160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2121160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果教师要了解学生是否达到了学习目标,熟练掌握评估的开发和使用是至关重要的。不幸的是,许多职前教师持有与促进学习相适应的观点不一致的信念。本研究旨在探讨认知信念与职前教师对评估基本概念的理解之间的关系。方法以282名参加教育心理学课程的本科生为研究对象。使用多元回归来检查这些关系,然后对现场日记账条目进行演绎分析。结果结果揭示了认知信念与评价理解之间的关系。那些相信知识是流动的和不断发展的人在课程和他们的实地经验之间建立了更多的联系,并表现出对基础概念的更好理解。我们的研究结果表明,教师教育计划应该以促进这些信念的方式来构建。这种信念可能会导致更有效的教学和评估实践,更符合促进下一代学生有意义的学习。关于这个话题已经知道的:(1)认知信念在学习中起作用。(2)认知信念与元认知策略使用、推理技能、批判性思维技能、创造力和动机相关。(3)评估实践可以塑造学生对知识本质的信念。本研究补充的内容:(1)对教师教育中认知信念的混合方法检验。(2)定量结果显示,认知信念显著影响职前教师对评价基础概念学习的差异。(3)定性结果显示,认识论信念较强的学生更有可能将课程作业与实地经验联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning of assessment in teacher education: the role of epistemic beliefs
ABSTRACT Objective Being skilled in the development and use of assessments is crucial if teachers are to know whether their students are meeting learning objectives. Unfortunately, many preservice teachers hold beliefs at odds with views that are adaptive for the promotion of learning. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore the relationships between epistemic beliefs and preservice teachers’ understanding of foundational concepts of assessment. Method Participants were 282 undergraduate students enrolled in an educational psychology course. Multiple regression was used to examine these relationships followed by a deductive analysis of field journal entries. Results Results revealed a relationship between epistemic beliefs and understanding of assessment. Those with beliefs in knowledge as more fluid and evolving made more connections between the course and their field experience and demonstrated greater understanding of foundational concepts. Conclusions Our findings suggest that teacher education programs should be structured in ways to promote these beliefs. Such beliefs may result in more effective teaching and assessment practices more congruent with the promotion of meaningful learning amongst the next generation of students. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Epistemic beliefs play a role in what is learned. (2) Epistemic beliefs are associated with metacognitive strategy use, reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, creativity, and motivation. (3) Assessment practices can shape students’ beliefs about the nature of knowledge. What this study adds: (1) A mixed-methods examination of epistemic beliefs in teacher education. (2) Quantitative results reveal epistemic beliefs significantly contribute to the variance in preservice teachers learning of foundation concepts of assessment. (3) Qualitative results reveal students with more epistemic beliefs are more likely to make connections between coursework and field experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Educational and Developmental Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Published biannually, this quality, peer-reviewed journal publishes psychological research that makes a substantial contribution to the knowledge and practice of education and developmental psychology. The broad aims are to provide a vehicle for dissemination of research that is of national and international significance to the researchers, practitioners and students of educational and developmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) in Iranian students Applying computer vision techniques to depression symptomatology through eye blink patterns in university students Rest breaks aid directed attention and learning Self-reported homesickness in Australian adolescent males during their first year at boarding school: an exploratory study of symptomatic features, its dimensionality, coping strategies, and the relationship with academic, resilience, emotional and mental wellbeing factors Cognitive flexibility and academic performance of children in care and children from a community sample: the contrasting mediator effect of task persistence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1