Julian A. Smith MS, FRACS , Marc Rabinov PhD, FRACS , James Anderson Msc, ccP , Mark R. Buckland FFARACS , Franklin L. Rosenfeldt MD, FRACS , Robert F. Salamonsen MD, FFARACS , Donald S. Esmore FRACS
{"title":"最初在澳大利亚使用Thoratec心室辅助装置的经验","authors":"Julian A. Smith MS, FRACS , Marc Rabinov PhD, FRACS , James Anderson Msc, ccP , Mark R. Buckland FFARACS , Franklin L. Rosenfeldt MD, FRACS , Robert F. Salamonsen MD, FFARACS , Donald S. Esmore FRACS","doi":"10.1016/1037-2091(92)90012-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Thoratec ventricular assist device consists of a polyurethane prosthetic ventricle with a 65 mL pumping chamber, dedicated atrial or ventricular inflow cannulae, an arterial outflow conduit and a pneumatic drive console. Since July 1990, this device has been used in 9 patients with cardiogenic shock. Of these, 6 were implanted as a bridge to transplantation or retransplantation, 2 were implanted to allow recovery of the native heart following coronary artery surgery and acute myocardial infarction, and 1 for primary cardiac allograft dysfunction soon after transplantation. Left ventricular assist alone was used in 7 patients and biventricular assist in the remaining 2 patients. Flow rates of 3.5 to 5.0 L/min were achieved. Support was maintained for an average of 17 days (range 6 hours to 61 days), with a total support experience of 154 days. Of the 6 bridge-to-transplantation patients, 4 subsequently underwent cardiac transplantation or retransplantation, 3 of whom are alive and well at a follow-up of 5 to 14 months. The remaining 3 of the 9 patients supported developed major morbidity from thromboembolism, sepsis or lower-limb ischaemia while being successfully supported and had support withdrawn. The Thoratec ventricular assist device is capable of chronically supporting the circulation of the critically ill patient in a preterminal state despite maximal medical therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101220,"journal":{"name":"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1037-2091(92)90012-F","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Australian experience with the Thoratec ventricular assist device\",\"authors\":\"Julian A. Smith MS, FRACS , Marc Rabinov PhD, FRACS , James Anderson Msc, ccP , Mark R. Buckland FFARACS , Franklin L. Rosenfeldt MD, FRACS , Robert F. Salamonsen MD, FFARACS , Donald S. Esmore FRACS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/1037-2091(92)90012-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Thoratec ventricular assist device consists of a polyurethane prosthetic ventricle with a 65 mL pumping chamber, dedicated atrial or ventricular inflow cannulae, an arterial outflow conduit and a pneumatic drive console. Since July 1990, this device has been used in 9 patients with cardiogenic shock. Of these, 6 were implanted as a bridge to transplantation or retransplantation, 2 were implanted to allow recovery of the native heart following coronary artery surgery and acute myocardial infarction, and 1 for primary cardiac allograft dysfunction soon after transplantation. Left ventricular assist alone was used in 7 patients and biventricular assist in the remaining 2 patients. Flow rates of 3.5 to 5.0 L/min were achieved. Support was maintained for an average of 17 days (range 6 hours to 61 days), with a total support experience of 154 days. Of the 6 bridge-to-transplantation patients, 4 subsequently underwent cardiac transplantation or retransplantation, 3 of whom are alive and well at a follow-up of 5 to 14 months. The remaining 3 of the 9 patients supported developed major morbidity from thromboembolism, sepsis or lower-limb ischaemia while being successfully supported and had support withdrawn. The Thoratec ventricular assist device is capable of chronically supporting the circulation of the critically ill patient in a preterminal state despite maximal medical therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 37-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1037-2091(92)90012-F\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/103720919290012F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/103720919290012F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Initial Australian experience with the Thoratec ventricular assist device
The Thoratec ventricular assist device consists of a polyurethane prosthetic ventricle with a 65 mL pumping chamber, dedicated atrial or ventricular inflow cannulae, an arterial outflow conduit and a pneumatic drive console. Since July 1990, this device has been used in 9 patients with cardiogenic shock. Of these, 6 were implanted as a bridge to transplantation or retransplantation, 2 were implanted to allow recovery of the native heart following coronary artery surgery and acute myocardial infarction, and 1 for primary cardiac allograft dysfunction soon after transplantation. Left ventricular assist alone was used in 7 patients and biventricular assist in the remaining 2 patients. Flow rates of 3.5 to 5.0 L/min were achieved. Support was maintained for an average of 17 days (range 6 hours to 61 days), with a total support experience of 154 days. Of the 6 bridge-to-transplantation patients, 4 subsequently underwent cardiac transplantation or retransplantation, 3 of whom are alive and well at a follow-up of 5 to 14 months. The remaining 3 of the 9 patients supported developed major morbidity from thromboembolism, sepsis or lower-limb ischaemia while being successfully supported and had support withdrawn. The Thoratec ventricular assist device is capable of chronically supporting the circulation of the critically ill patient in a preterminal state despite maximal medical therapy.