无人机扫描路径分析(was)

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.13167/2022.25.3
Kornelija Bogdan, I. Barišić, Vladimir Moser, Damir Rajle
{"title":"无人机扫描路径分析(was)","authors":"Kornelija Bogdan, I. Barišić, Vladimir Moser, Damir Rajle","doi":"10.13167/2022.25.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was the verification of unmanned aerial system (UAS) application in vehicle swept path analyses by analysing the advantages and disadvantages and comparing field test results with two software solutions. In this study, swept-path analyses were performed for two vehicle types and two turning angles. UAS images were used to extract the vehicle swept path and the results were compared with two commonly used swept-path analysis software. The results indicated larger deviations between the swept paths for an angle of 125° for a light truck. For both analysed vehicles and turning angles, larger deviations were observed for the outermost point trajectory. Passenger cars occupy less space performing 125° turns than software analysis predicts, indicating that they are on the safe side when designing vehicle manipulative surfaces. For the analysed light truck, a larger turning radius was observed than the predicted for a 125° turning angle, which may be caused by the approaching and turning speeds under which the test was performed. Finally, while the UAS recording process is relatively simple and fast, data processing is demanding and time-consuming. To fulfil its full potential within swept path analyses, UAS needs to be complemented by proper data analysis software solutions for faster and more accurate swept path extraction, which would improve and rationalise the traffic area designing process.","PeriodicalId":29665,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SWEPT PATH ANALYSES USING UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS)\",\"authors\":\"Kornelija Bogdan, I. Barišić, Vladimir Moser, Damir Rajle\",\"doi\":\"10.13167/2022.25.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was the verification of unmanned aerial system (UAS) application in vehicle swept path analyses by analysing the advantages and disadvantages and comparing field test results with two software solutions. In this study, swept-path analyses were performed for two vehicle types and two turning angles. UAS images were used to extract the vehicle swept path and the results were compared with two commonly used swept-path analysis software. The results indicated larger deviations between the swept paths for an angle of 125° for a light truck. For both analysed vehicles and turning angles, larger deviations were observed for the outermost point trajectory. Passenger cars occupy less space performing 125° turns than software analysis predicts, indicating that they are on the safe side when designing vehicle manipulative surfaces. For the analysed light truck, a larger turning radius was observed than the predicted for a 125° turning angle, which may be caused by the approaching and turning speeds under which the test was performed. Finally, while the UAS recording process is relatively simple and fast, data processing is demanding and time-consuming. To fulfil its full potential within swept path analyses, UAS needs to be complemented by proper data analysis software solutions for faster and more accurate swept path extraction, which would improve and rationalise the traffic area designing process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13167/2022.25.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2022.25.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过分析两种软件解决方案的优缺点并比较现场测试结果,验证无人机系统(UAS)在车辆扫掠路径分析中的应用。在本研究中,对两种车辆类型和两种转弯角度进行了扫描路径分析。利用无人机图像提取车辆扫描路径,并与两种常用扫描路径分析软件进行比较。结果表明,对于轻型卡车,125°角时扫掠路径之间的偏差较大。对于分析的车辆和转弯角度,观察到最外层点轨迹的较大偏差。乘用车在125°转弯时占用的空间比软件分析预测的要少,这表明在设计车辆操纵面时,它们是安全的。对于所分析的轻型卡车,在125°转弯角度下观察到的转弯半径比预测的要大,这可能是由接近和转弯速度造成的。最后,虽然UAS记录过程相对简单和快速,但数据处理要求高且耗时。为了充分发挥扫描路径分析的潜力,无人机系统需要适当的数据分析软件解决方案,以更快和更准确地提取扫描路径,这将改善和合理化交通区域设计过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SWEPT PATH ANALYSES USING UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS)
The aim of this study was the verification of unmanned aerial system (UAS) application in vehicle swept path analyses by analysing the advantages and disadvantages and comparing field test results with two software solutions. In this study, swept-path analyses were performed for two vehicle types and two turning angles. UAS images were used to extract the vehicle swept path and the results were compared with two commonly used swept-path analysis software. The results indicated larger deviations between the swept paths for an angle of 125° for a light truck. For both analysed vehicles and turning angles, larger deviations were observed for the outermost point trajectory. Passenger cars occupy less space performing 125° turns than software analysis predicts, indicating that they are on the safe side when designing vehicle manipulative surfaces. For the analysed light truck, a larger turning radius was observed than the predicted for a 125° turning angle, which may be caused by the approaching and turning speeds under which the test was performed. Finally, while the UAS recording process is relatively simple and fast, data processing is demanding and time-consuming. To fulfil its full potential within swept path analyses, UAS needs to be complemented by proper data analysis software solutions for faster and more accurate swept path extraction, which would improve and rationalise the traffic area designing process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fundamental period equations for plan irregular moment-resisting frame buildings Cotton knitted fabric waste as reinforcement in cement screed EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF A NOVEL MAGNETIC POLE REPULSIVE PASSIVE DAMPER FOR VIBRATION CONTROL MAGNETIC POLE REPULSIVE DAMPER (MPRD): A PROMISING SOLUTION FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION OF STRUCTURES SHEAR BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED-CONCRETE BEAMS INCORPORATING IRON FILINGS AS SAND REPLACEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1