企业风险管理与公司伦理:以南非一家短期保险公司为例

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Insurance Markets and Companies Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.01
Krishna K. Govender, R. Hassen‐Bootha
{"title":"企业风险管理与公司伦理:以南非一家短期保险公司为例","authors":"Krishna K. Govender, R. Hassen‐Bootha","doi":"10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between enterprise risk management (ERM) and company ethics, so as to understand the central role of risk management in improving company ethics. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to survey all 122 employees of an insurance organization. The level of ethics was measured by posing questions on the integrity, trustworthiness, and level of respect for top management, middle management, and non-management. The overall Cronbach’s alpha for the instrument measuring the level of ethics was 0.865, indicating that the instrument was highly reliable.The relationship between ERM controls and the level of ethics was determined using regression analysis, which produced a F value of 0.268 (p-value 0.607), which implied that there is no relationship between ERM controls and the level of ethics. It was also ascertained that ethics and compliance-related issues are not fully embraced by the organization. This implied that the insurance company is at a level of “nominal” risk management with uncoordinated, top-down risk management activities.Since ethics risk exposure resulting from poor corporate governance has been identified by the Institute of Risk Management as being a key contributor to many business failures in South Africa (and internationally), the exploratory findings can stimulate the leadership to institute polices to mitigate poor governance and risk as this will benefit all stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":32827,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Markets and Companies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enterprise risk management and company ethics: The case of a short-term insurer in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Krishna K. Govender, R. Hassen‐Bootha\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between enterprise risk management (ERM) and company ethics, so as to understand the central role of risk management in improving company ethics. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to survey all 122 employees of an insurance organization. The level of ethics was measured by posing questions on the integrity, trustworthiness, and level of respect for top management, middle management, and non-management. The overall Cronbach’s alpha for the instrument measuring the level of ethics was 0.865, indicating that the instrument was highly reliable.The relationship between ERM controls and the level of ethics was determined using regression analysis, which produced a F value of 0.268 (p-value 0.607), which implied that there is no relationship between ERM controls and the level of ethics. It was also ascertained that ethics and compliance-related issues are not fully embraced by the organization. This implied that the insurance company is at a level of “nominal” risk management with uncoordinated, top-down risk management activities.Since ethics risk exposure resulting from poor corporate governance has been identified by the Institute of Risk Management as being a key contributor to many business failures in South Africa (and internationally), the exploratory findings can stimulate the leadership to institute polices to mitigate poor governance and risk as this will benefit all stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance Markets and Companies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance Markets and Companies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Markets and Companies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨企业风险管理(ERM)与公司伦理之间的关系,以了解风险管理在改善公司伦理方面的核心作用。采用李克特5分制问卷对某保险机构122名员工进行调查。道德水平是通过对高层管理人员、中层管理人员和非管理人员的诚信、可信度和尊重程度等问题来衡量的。测量伦理水平的仪器的总体Cronbach 's alpha为0.865,表明该仪器具有高信度。采用回归分析确定ERM控制与伦理水平之间的关系,其F值为0.268 (p值0.607),表明ERM控制与伦理水平之间没有关系。还确定了道德和合规相关的问题没有被组织完全接受。这意味着保险公司处于“名义”风险管理水平,风险管理活动不协调,自上而下。由于风险管理研究所(Institute of risk Management)认为,公司治理不善导致的道德风险暴露是导致南非(以及国际上)许多企业失败的关键因素,因此探索性发现可以刺激领导层制定政策,以减轻治理不善和风险,因为这将使所有利益相关者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enterprise risk management and company ethics: The case of a short-term insurer in South Africa
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between enterprise risk management (ERM) and company ethics, so as to understand the central role of risk management in improving company ethics. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to survey all 122 employees of an insurance organization. The level of ethics was measured by posing questions on the integrity, trustworthiness, and level of respect for top management, middle management, and non-management. The overall Cronbach’s alpha for the instrument measuring the level of ethics was 0.865, indicating that the instrument was highly reliable.The relationship between ERM controls and the level of ethics was determined using regression analysis, which produced a F value of 0.268 (p-value 0.607), which implied that there is no relationship between ERM controls and the level of ethics. It was also ascertained that ethics and compliance-related issues are not fully embraced by the organization. This implied that the insurance company is at a level of “nominal” risk management with uncoordinated, top-down risk management activities.Since ethics risk exposure resulting from poor corporate governance has been identified by the Institute of Risk Management as being a key contributor to many business failures in South Africa (and internationally), the exploratory findings can stimulate the leadership to institute polices to mitigate poor governance and risk as this will benefit all stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Markets and Companies
Insurance Markets and Companies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency assessment and trends in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis of DEA application Competitive positioning and market share of selected insurance companies: case of Nigeria Leadership in the digital era: Exploring the nexus between leadership styles and job satisfaction. The mediating role of perceived organizational politics in Jordanian insurance companies Contribution of the non-life insurance sector to the economic growth of Nepal: Analysis from the EGLS approach The use of blockchain in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1