拉科沙胺与左乙拉西坦在新发局灶性癫痫中的等效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Insect Conservation Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI:10.25259/JNRP_182_2023
Binaya Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi, Menka Jha, Priyanka Samal, Camelia Porey
{"title":"拉科沙胺与左乙拉西坦在新发局灶性癫痫中的等效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Binaya Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi, Menka Jha, Priyanka Samal, Camelia Porey","doi":"10.25259/JNRP_182_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Levetiracetam (LEV) is a well-established broad spectrum antiseizure medication (ASM) effective in focal, generalized, and myoclonic seizures whereas lacosamide (LCM) is a comparatively newer ASM currently approved only as an add-on agent in focal seizures. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and the tolerability of oral LCM as monotherapy in adult people with epilepsy (PWE) with new onset focal onset epilepsy compared with those receiving LEV.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this open-label single-center non-inferiority trial, PWE aged between 16 and 65 years suffering from new onset focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization were put on LCM monotherapy or LEV monotherapy. Data regarding demographic characteristics, seizure type and etiology, LCM and LEV daily dose, seizure frequency at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up, and seizure freedom rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five PWE on LCM (24 males), their mean age: 38.20 ± 16.62 years and 35 PWE on LEV (25 males, mean age: 38.91 ± 17.13 years) were enrolled. The most common type of seizure observed was focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure >70% followed by focal impaired awareness seizure and focal awareness seizure. Structural epilepsy was found in 21 among LCM group and 22 of LEV group. In the LCM group, the seizure frequency decreased from 3.33 ± 1.88 to 0.85 ± 1.09 (<i>P</i> = 0.001) at 6 months and from 3.61 ± 3.12 to 0.94 ± 1.24 (<i>P</i> = 0.001) in LEV group, intergroup difference (<i>P</i> = 0.74). At 6-month follow-up period, 78.9% in LCM arm and 87.9% in the LEV arm had experienced a 50% of reduction in seizure frequency while seizure freedom was attained in 43.3% of PWE in both the arms (<i>P</i> = 1). The most common treatment emergent adverse effects in the LCM group were fatiguability, dyspepsia, headache, and dizziness, while in the LEV group; somnolence and behavioral abnormality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with LCM met the non-inferiority criteria when compared with LEV. Therefore, it might be useful as first-line monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Conservation","volume":"22 1","pages":"622-628"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equipotency of lacosamide to levetiracetam in new onset focal epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Binaya Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi, Menka Jha, Priyanka Samal, Camelia Porey\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/JNRP_182_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Levetiracetam (LEV) is a well-established broad spectrum antiseizure medication (ASM) effective in focal, generalized, and myoclonic seizures whereas lacosamide (LCM) is a comparatively newer ASM currently approved only as an add-on agent in focal seizures. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and the tolerability of oral LCM as monotherapy in adult people with epilepsy (PWE) with new onset focal onset epilepsy compared with those receiving LEV.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this open-label single-center non-inferiority trial, PWE aged between 16 and 65 years suffering from new onset focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization were put on LCM monotherapy or LEV monotherapy. Data regarding demographic characteristics, seizure type and etiology, LCM and LEV daily dose, seizure frequency at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up, and seizure freedom rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five PWE on LCM (24 males), their mean age: 38.20 ± 16.62 years and 35 PWE on LEV (25 males, mean age: 38.91 ± 17.13 years) were enrolled. The most common type of seizure observed was focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure >70% followed by focal impaired awareness seizure and focal awareness seizure. Structural epilepsy was found in 21 among LCM group and 22 of LEV group. In the LCM group, the seizure frequency decreased from 3.33 ± 1.88 to 0.85 ± 1.09 (<i>P</i> = 0.001) at 6 months and from 3.61 ± 3.12 to 0.94 ± 1.24 (<i>P</i> = 0.001) in LEV group, intergroup difference (<i>P</i> = 0.74). At 6-month follow-up period, 78.9% in LCM arm and 87.9% in the LEV arm had experienced a 50% of reduction in seizure frequency while seizure freedom was attained in 43.3% of PWE in both the arms (<i>P</i> = 1). The most common treatment emergent adverse effects in the LCM group were fatiguability, dyspepsia, headache, and dizziness, while in the LEV group; somnolence and behavioral abnormality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with LCM met the non-inferiority criteria when compared with LEV. Therefore, it might be useful as first-line monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Insect Conservation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"622-628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Insect Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_182_2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_182_2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:左乙拉西坦(LEV)是一种公认的广谱抗癫痫药物(ASM),对局灶性、全面性和肌阵挛性发作有效,而拉科沙胺(LCM)是一种相对较新的抗癫痫药物,目前仅被批准作为局灶性癫痫发作的附加药物。该研究的目的是评估口服LCM作为单药治疗新发局灶性癫痫的成人癫痫患者(PWE)与接受LEV的患者的疗效和耐受性。材料和方法:在这项开放标签单中心非劣效性试验中,年龄在16 - 65岁之间的PWE患有新发局灶性癫痫发作,伴有或不伴有继发性普遍化,分别接受LCM单药或LEV单药治疗。记录人口统计学特征、癫痫发作类型和病因、LCM和LEV日剂量、基线和随访6个月时的癫痫发作频率以及癫痫发作自由率等数据。结果:LCM组35例(男性24例),平均年龄38.20±16.62岁;LEV组35例(男性25例,平均年龄38.91±17.13岁)。最常见的癫痫类型是局灶性至双侧强直阵挛性癫痫发作>70%,其次是局灶性意识受损癫痫发作和局灶性意识癫痫发作。LCM组21例结构性癫痫,LEV组22例。LCM组6月癫痫发作次数由3.33±1.88次降至0.85±1.09次(P = 0.001), LEV组6月癫痫发作次数由3.61±3.12次降至0.94±1.24次(P = 0.001),组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.74)。在6个月的随访期间,78.9%的LCM组和87.9%的LEV组的癫痫发作频率降低了50%,而两组中43.3%的PWE患者癫痫发作自由(P = 1)。LCM组最常见的治疗不良反应是疲劳、消化不良、头痛和头晕,而LEV组;嗜睡和行为异常。结论:与LEV相比,LCM治疗符合非劣效性标准。因此,它可能是有用的一线单药治疗成人新诊断局灶性癫痫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equipotency of lacosamide to levetiracetam in new onset focal epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a well-established broad spectrum antiseizure medication (ASM) effective in focal, generalized, and myoclonic seizures whereas lacosamide (LCM) is a comparatively newer ASM currently approved only as an add-on agent in focal seizures. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and the tolerability of oral LCM as monotherapy in adult people with epilepsy (PWE) with new onset focal onset epilepsy compared with those receiving LEV.

Materials and methods: In this open-label single-center non-inferiority trial, PWE aged between 16 and 65 years suffering from new onset focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization were put on LCM monotherapy or LEV monotherapy. Data regarding demographic characteristics, seizure type and etiology, LCM and LEV daily dose, seizure frequency at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up, and seizure freedom rates were recorded.

Results: Thirty-five PWE on LCM (24 males), their mean age: 38.20 ± 16.62 years and 35 PWE on LEV (25 males, mean age: 38.91 ± 17.13 years) were enrolled. The most common type of seizure observed was focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure >70% followed by focal impaired awareness seizure and focal awareness seizure. Structural epilepsy was found in 21 among LCM group and 22 of LEV group. In the LCM group, the seizure frequency decreased from 3.33 ± 1.88 to 0.85 ± 1.09 (P = 0.001) at 6 months and from 3.61 ± 3.12 to 0.94 ± 1.24 (P = 0.001) in LEV group, intergroup difference (P = 0.74). At 6-month follow-up period, 78.9% in LCM arm and 87.9% in the LEV arm had experienced a 50% of reduction in seizure frequency while seizure freedom was attained in 43.3% of PWE in both the arms (P = 1). The most common treatment emergent adverse effects in the LCM group were fatiguability, dyspepsia, headache, and dizziness, while in the LEV group; somnolence and behavioral abnormality.

Conclusion: Treatment with LCM met the non-inferiority criteria when compared with LEV. Therefore, it might be useful as first-line monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Conservation is an international journal devoted to the publication of articles concerned with the conservation of insects and related invertebrates. The Journal of Insect Conservation publishes papers on all aspects of conservation and biodiversity related to the insects and closely related groups such as Arachnids and Myriapods, including ecological work which has conservation implications. Research papers may address the subject at the community, population or species level, may cover aspects of behaviour, taxonomy or genetics, be theoretical or practical, and be local or global in nature. Review articles are welcome as well as points of view which are likely to stimulate debate. From time to time the journal will publish Special Issues on specific subject areas which are the focus of current research. Proposals for such issues are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Movement patterns of the endemic flightless bush-cricket, Isophya beybienkoi Spearhead blues: How threats to the damselfly Coenagrion hastulatum changed over time Butterfly community structure in belize: species richness patterns reveal the role of climate gradients in shaping butterfly community structure and strategies for long-term conservation Ant habitat-use guilds response to forest-pasture shifting in the southwestern Amazon Mission Monarch: engaging the Canadian public for the conservation of a species at risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1