静脉注射右美托咪定与艾司洛尔对气管内拔管血流动力学反应的衰减:一项随机双盲研究

P. Shah, K. Sahare, R. Bhuaarya, Falgudhara Panda
{"title":"静脉注射右美托咪定与艾司洛尔对气管内拔管血流动力学反应的衰减:一项随机双盲研究","authors":"P. Shah, K. Sahare, R. Bhuaarya, Falgudhara Panda","doi":"10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i2b.396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Tracheal extubation is a crucial step of general anaesthesia which is associated with intense airway and hemodynamic responses secondary to activation of mechanoreceptors in larynx. The present study aims to compare the efficacy of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine and esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation. Materials and Method: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 80 ASA I-II patients of 18-60 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups of forty each. Anticipated ten minutes before the extubation Group D received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg diluted in 10 ml normal saline and Group E received 10 ml of normal saline. Two min before extubation Group D received 10 ml normal saline and Group E received esmolol bolus dose 1 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml normal saline. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, extubation and emergence time, Ramsay sedation score and adverse events were recorded. Results: Mean heart rate was significantly lower in group D from 5 min of drug administration till 20 min post extubation as compared to group E. Mean systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure were significantly lower in group D as compared to group E from 8 min after administration of drug till 20 min of post extubation ( p <0.05). Emergence time, extubation time and adverse events were comparable in both the groups ( p >0.05). Delayed emergence was observed in 2 patients in group D. More number of patients in group D were sedated. Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine is better in attenuating haemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation than esmolol because of comparatively stable haemodynamics, comparable emergence and extubation time, conscious sedation, less postoperative cough and agitation.","PeriodicalId":14146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus esmolol for attenuation of haemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation: A randomized double-blind study\",\"authors\":\"P. Shah, K. Sahare, R. Bhuaarya, Falgudhara Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i2b.396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Tracheal extubation is a crucial step of general anaesthesia which is associated with intense airway and hemodynamic responses secondary to activation of mechanoreceptors in larynx. The present study aims to compare the efficacy of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine and esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation. Materials and Method: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 80 ASA I-II patients of 18-60 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups of forty each. Anticipated ten minutes before the extubation Group D received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg diluted in 10 ml normal saline and Group E received 10 ml of normal saline. Two min before extubation Group D received 10 ml normal saline and Group E received esmolol bolus dose 1 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml normal saline. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, extubation and emergence time, Ramsay sedation score and adverse events were recorded. Results: Mean heart rate was significantly lower in group D from 5 min of drug administration till 20 min post extubation as compared to group E. Mean systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure were significantly lower in group D as compared to group E from 8 min after administration of drug till 20 min of post extubation ( p <0.05). Emergence time, extubation time and adverse events were comparable in both the groups ( p >0.05). Delayed emergence was observed in 2 patients in group D. More number of patients in group D were sedated. Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine is better in attenuating haemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation than esmolol because of comparatively stable haemodynamics, comparable emergence and extubation time, conscious sedation, less postoperative cough and agitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i2b.396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i2b.396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:气管拔管是全身麻醉的关键步骤,它与喉部机械感受器激活引起的强烈气道和血流动力学反应有关。本研究旨在比较静脉给药右美托咪定和艾斯洛尔对气管内拔管血流动力学反应的减弱效果。材料和方法:本前瞻性、随机、双盲研究对80例18-60岁的ASA I-II型患者进行了全麻下择期手术。他们被随机分成两组,每组40人。拔管前10分钟,D组静脉滴注右美托咪定0.5µg/kg,用生理盐水10 ml稀释,E组静脉滴注生理盐水10 ml。拔管前2 min, D组给予生理盐水10 ml, E组给予艾斯洛尔丸剂1 mg/kg,用生理盐水10 ml稀释。记录患者心率、收缩压、舒张压、平均血压、拔管及急诊时间、Ramsay镇静评分及不良事件。结果:给药后5 min至拔管后20 min, D组平均心率显著低于E组。给药后8 min至拔管后20 min, D组平均收缩压、舒张压及平均血压显著低于E组(p < 0.05)。D组有2例患者出现延迟出现。结论:静脉注射右美托咪定比艾司洛尔更能降低气管内拔管后的血流动力学反应,因其血流动力学相对稳定,出现和拔管时间相当,有清醒镇静作用,术后咳嗽和躁动较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus esmolol for attenuation of haemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation: A randomized double-blind study
Background and Aim: Tracheal extubation is a crucial step of general anaesthesia which is associated with intense airway and hemodynamic responses secondary to activation of mechanoreceptors in larynx. The present study aims to compare the efficacy of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine and esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation. Materials and Method: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 80 ASA I-II patients of 18-60 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups of forty each. Anticipated ten minutes before the extubation Group D received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg diluted in 10 ml normal saline and Group E received 10 ml of normal saline. Two min before extubation Group D received 10 ml normal saline and Group E received esmolol bolus dose 1 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml normal saline. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, extubation and emergence time, Ramsay sedation score and adverse events were recorded. Results: Mean heart rate was significantly lower in group D from 5 min of drug administration till 20 min post extubation as compared to group E. Mean systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure were significantly lower in group D as compared to group E from 8 min after administration of drug till 20 min of post extubation ( p <0.05). Emergence time, extubation time and adverse events were comparable in both the groups ( p >0.05). Delayed emergence was observed in 2 patients in group D. More number of patients in group D were sedated. Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine is better in attenuating haemodynamic response to endotracheal extubation than esmolol because of comparatively stable haemodynamics, comparable emergence and extubation time, conscious sedation, less postoperative cough and agitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrospective study: The impact of BUHE positioning and video laryngoscopy on intubation success rates in the emergency department Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio versus lactate-albumin ratio as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock Prediction of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarian section with focus on carotid doppler ultrasound and cardiometry to study the effectiveness of dexamethasone as an adjuvant with levobupivacaine 0.5% in USG guided interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgeries The effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral single shot pecto-intercostal plane block on recovery after on-pump coronary bypass graft surgery, randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1