社会保障“私有化”对雇主的潜在影响:政策研究启示

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risk Management and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2009-04-27 DOI:10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00062.X

K. A. Olsen, Jack L. VanDerhei

{"title":"社会保障“私有化”对雇主的潜在影响:政策研究启示","authors":"K. A. Olsen, Jack L. VanDerhei","doi":"10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00062.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": While traditional fixes to restore Social Security to actuarial balance have known consequences for employers, opinion polls show strong public support for nontraditional approaches, e.g., the stock market investment of Social Security funds (privatization). The authors examine some of the complex assumptions which have been raised as the basis for determining if privitization would benefit employers and discuss the lack of research available to support or dispute the validity of some of these assumptions.","PeriodicalId":35338,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"32-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR EMPLOYERS OF SOCIAL SECURITY “PRIVATIZATION:” POLICY RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS\",\"authors\":\"K. A. Olsen, Jack L. VanDerhei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00062.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": While traditional fixes to restore Social Security to actuarial balance have known consequences for employers, opinion polls show strong public support for nontraditional approaches, e.g., the stock market investment of Social Security funds (privatization). The authors examine some of the complex assumptions which have been raised as the basis for determining if privitization would benefit employers and discuss the lack of research available to support or dispute the validity of some of these assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"32-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00062.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00062.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然将社会保障恢复到精算平衡的传统方法对雇主有已知的后果，但民意调查显示，公众强烈支持非传统方法，例如，社会保障基金的股票市场投资(私有化)。作者研究了一些复杂的假设，这些假设是确定私有化是否会使雇主受益的基础，并讨论了缺乏可用的研究来支持或质疑其中一些假设的有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR EMPLOYERS OF SOCIAL SECURITY “PRIVATIZATION:” POLICY RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS

: While traditional fixes to restore Social Security to actuarial balance have known consequences for employers, opinion polls show strong public support for nontraditional approaches, e.g., the stock market investment of Social Security funds (privatization). The authors examine some of the complex assumptions which have been raised as the basis for determining if privitization would benefit employers and discuss the lack of research available to support or dispute the validity of some of these assumptions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Risk Management and Insurance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Risk Management and Insurance Review publishes respected, accessible, and high-quality applied research, and well-reasoned opinion and discussion in the field of risk and insurance. The Review"s "Feature Articles" section includes original research involving applications and applied techniques. The "Perspectives" section contains articles providing new insights on the research literature, business practice, and public policy. The "Educational Insights" section provides a repository of high-caliber model lectures in risk and insurance, along with articles discussing and evaluating instructional techniques.