Steven P. Oncley, Anthony C. Delany, Thomas W. Horst, Pieter P. Tans
{"title":"用松弛涡流积累法测量通量的验证","authors":"Steven P. Oncley, Anthony C. Delany, Thomas W. Horst, Pieter P. Tans","doi":"10.1016/0960-1686(93)90409-R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Businger and Oncley (1990; Flux measurement with conditional sampling, <em>J. Atmos. Ocean Technol.</em><strong>7</strong>, 349–352) proposed a method to measure fluxes of scalar quantities by determining the mean concentration difference between air samples collected selectively during updrafts. This method has been tested for carbon dioxide over a growing cotton field where the fluxes were large. Simultaneous direct flux measurements were made using the eddy-correlation technique. These two techniques gave fluxes which were mostly within 20% on one of the two experiment days; however, the other day had cases with large differences. These differences are suspected to have been caused by a failure of the infra-red absorption sensor used to make the fast carbon dioxide measurements for the eddy-correlation technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100139,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics","volume":"27 15","pages":"Pages 2417-2426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90409-R","citationCount":"103","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of flux measurement using relaxed eddy accumulation\",\"authors\":\"Steven P. Oncley, Anthony C. Delany, Thomas W. Horst, Pieter P. Tans\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0960-1686(93)90409-R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Businger and Oncley (1990; Flux measurement with conditional sampling, <em>J. Atmos. Ocean Technol.</em><strong>7</strong>, 349–352) proposed a method to measure fluxes of scalar quantities by determining the mean concentration difference between air samples collected selectively during updrafts. This method has been tested for carbon dioxide over a growing cotton field where the fluxes were large. Simultaneous direct flux measurements were made using the eddy-correlation technique. These two techniques gave fluxes which were mostly within 20% on one of the two experiment days; however, the other day had cases with large differences. These differences are suspected to have been caused by a failure of the infra-red absorption sensor used to make the fast carbon dioxide measurements for the eddy-correlation technique.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics\",\"volume\":\"27 15\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2417-2426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90409-R\",\"citationCount\":\"103\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096016869390409R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096016869390409R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Verification of flux measurement using relaxed eddy accumulation
Businger and Oncley (1990; Flux measurement with conditional sampling, J. Atmos. Ocean Technol.7, 349–352) proposed a method to measure fluxes of scalar quantities by determining the mean concentration difference between air samples collected selectively during updrafts. This method has been tested for carbon dioxide over a growing cotton field where the fluxes were large. Simultaneous direct flux measurements were made using the eddy-correlation technique. These two techniques gave fluxes which were mostly within 20% on one of the two experiment days; however, the other day had cases with large differences. These differences are suspected to have been caused by a failure of the infra-red absorption sensor used to make the fast carbon dioxide measurements for the eddy-correlation technique.