在主流课堂中使用强化和独立评分来促进和保持任务的准确性

Miriam Baer , Susan A. Fowler , Lisa Carden-Smith
{"title":"在主流课堂中使用强化和独立评分来促进和保持任务的准确性","authors":"Miriam Baer ,&nbsp;Susan A. Fowler ,&nbsp;Lisa Carden-Smith","doi":"10.1016/0270-4684(84)90038-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the effectiveness with which a 6-year-old boy, who exhibited severe conduct disorders and learning delays, could be taught to grade his daily assignments and maintain a high level of task accuracy. Results indicate that a reinforcement contingency (access to recess), requiring 80% task accuracy, was sufficient to increase more substantially the child's task accuracy and on-task performance and to decrease his disruptions. Responsibility for grading the daily assignments and for determining eligibility for reinforcement was then shifted from a classroom tutor to the child. Initially, the child's grading was checked bythe tutor following each task; later, to promote more accurate grading, a mild response cost system was implemented for inaccurate grading and bonus points were provided for grading incorrect or incomplete responses as errors. Tutor checking was faded systematically until the child was grading all tasks independently. The child maintained high task accuracy throughout all fading phases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(84)90038-7","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using reinforcement and independent-grading to promote and maintain task accuracy in a mainstreamed class\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Baer ,&nbsp;Susan A. Fowler ,&nbsp;Lisa Carden-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0270-4684(84)90038-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined the effectiveness with which a 6-year-old boy, who exhibited severe conduct disorders and learning delays, could be taught to grade his daily assignments and maintain a high level of task accuracy. Results indicate that a reinforcement contingency (access to recess), requiring 80% task accuracy, was sufficient to increase more substantially the child's task accuracy and on-task performance and to decrease his disruptions. Responsibility for grading the daily assignments and for determining eligibility for reinforcement was then shifted from a classroom tutor to the child. Initially, the child's grading was checked bythe tutor following each task; later, to promote more accurate grading, a mild response cost system was implemented for inaccurate grading and bonus points were provided for grading incorrect or incomplete responses as errors. Tutor checking was faded systematically until the child was grading all tasks independently. The child maintained high task accuracy throughout all fading phases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(84)90038-7\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468484900387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468484900387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究考察了一个表现出严重行为障碍和学习迟缓的6岁男孩,如何被教导给他的日常作业评分并保持高水平的任务准确性的有效性。结果表明,强化偶然性(进入课间休息),要求80%的任务准确度,足以更大幅度地提高儿童的任务准确度和任务内表现,并减少他的干扰。对日常作业进行评分和确定是否有资格进行强化的责任随后从课堂导师转移到孩子身上。一开始,老师会在每个任务完成后检查孩子的成绩;后来,为了提高评分的准确性,对不准确的评分实行了温和的响应成本制度,对不正确或不完整的评分为错误提供了加分。家教检查逐渐消失,直到孩子能够独立完成所有的作业。儿童在所有衰退阶段都保持较高的任务准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using reinforcement and independent-grading to promote and maintain task accuracy in a mainstreamed class

This study examined the effectiveness with which a 6-year-old boy, who exhibited severe conduct disorders and learning delays, could be taught to grade his daily assignments and maintain a high level of task accuracy. Results indicate that a reinforcement contingency (access to recess), requiring 80% task accuracy, was sufficient to increase more substantially the child's task accuracy and on-task performance and to decrease his disruptions. Responsibility for grading the daily assignments and for determining eligibility for reinforcement was then shifted from a classroom tutor to the child. Initially, the child's grading was checked bythe tutor following each task; later, to promote more accurate grading, a mild response cost system was implemented for inaccurate grading and bonus points were provided for grading incorrect or incomplete responses as errors. Tutor checking was faded systematically until the child was grading all tasks independently. The child maintained high task accuracy throughout all fading phases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preface Control by exclusion in arbitrary matching-to-sample Stimulus control of eye orientations: Shaping S+ only versus shaping S- only An equivalence model for vocabulary acquisition in profoundly hearing-impaired children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1