{"title":"8.东北凯斯尼斯古红砂岩的地层修正","authors":"R. Donovan, Richard J. Foster, T. S. Westoll","doi":"10.1017/S0080456800015118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis The stratigraphy of the Old Red Sandstone between Latheron and Brough in north-eastern Caithness has been revised. Stratigraphical subdivision in this area is primarily based on variations in lithology but is supported by the recognition of distinct faunal assemblages. The terms Wick Flagstone and Thurso Flagstone are discarded both as Group and Formation names and in their place type sequences different from those given by the Survey are proposed on the basis of the more continuous exposure seen between Ellens Goe and Latheron in eastern Caithness and in the Ham/Scarfskerry area of northern Caithness. The revision has been facilitated by an analysis of the structure of the area which suggests that a variable c. east-west compression has been the dominant controlling factor in the development of the structure of Caithness. As a result of the revision the position of the Achanarras Fish Bed is now clear. The Passage Beds Group is no longer considered a meaningful subdivision as it is partly overlain by and partly overlies this Fish Bed. The John o' Groats Sandstone Group is thought to probably overlie the Caithness Flagstones conformably. The following major stratigraphical subdivisions are recognised: D. John o' Groats Sandstone Group. C. Upper Caithness Flagstone Group (c) Mey Subgroup (b) Ham-Scarfskerry Subgroup (a) Latheron Subgroup. B. Lower Caithness Flagstone Group (position of Achanarras Fish Bed) (d) Robbery Head Subgroup (c) Lybster Subgroup (b) Hillhead Red Bed Subgroup (a) Clyth Subgroup. A. Sarclet Group. A typographical device is used for formal description of formations and groups whose boundaries are truncated by faults.","PeriodicalId":23232,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh","volume":"52 1","pages":"167 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8.—A Stratigraphical Revision of the Old Red Sandstone of North-eastern Caithness\",\"authors\":\"R. Donovan, Richard J. Foster, T. S. Westoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0080456800015118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Synopsis The stratigraphy of the Old Red Sandstone between Latheron and Brough in north-eastern Caithness has been revised. Stratigraphical subdivision in this area is primarily based on variations in lithology but is supported by the recognition of distinct faunal assemblages. The terms Wick Flagstone and Thurso Flagstone are discarded both as Group and Formation names and in their place type sequences different from those given by the Survey are proposed on the basis of the more continuous exposure seen between Ellens Goe and Latheron in eastern Caithness and in the Ham/Scarfskerry area of northern Caithness. The revision has been facilitated by an analysis of the structure of the area which suggests that a variable c. east-west compression has been the dominant controlling factor in the development of the structure of Caithness. As a result of the revision the position of the Achanarras Fish Bed is now clear. The Passage Beds Group is no longer considered a meaningful subdivision as it is partly overlain by and partly overlies this Fish Bed. The John o' Groats Sandstone Group is thought to probably overlie the Caithness Flagstones conformably. The following major stratigraphical subdivisions are recognised: D. John o' Groats Sandstone Group. C. Upper Caithness Flagstone Group (c) Mey Subgroup (b) Ham-Scarfskerry Subgroup (a) Latheron Subgroup. B. Lower Caithness Flagstone Group (position of Achanarras Fish Bed) (d) Robbery Head Subgroup (c) Lybster Subgroup (b) Hillhead Red Bed Subgroup (a) Clyth Subgroup. A. Sarclet Group. A typographical device is used for formal description of formations and groups whose boundaries are truncated by faults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1974-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800015118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800015118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47
摘要
对英国东北部Latheron - Brough古红砂岩地层进行了订正。该地区的地层划分主要基于岩性的变化,但也得到了对不同动物组合的认识的支持。Wick Flagstone和Thurso Flagstone这两个术语作为组名和组名都被抛弃了,它们的位置类型序列也与调查中给出的不同,这是基于凯斯内斯东部的Ellens Goe和Latheron以及凯斯内斯北部的Ham/ scarfskery地区之间更连续的暴露而提出的。对该地区构造的分析表明,一个可变的c.东西挤压是凯斯尼斯构造发展的主要控制因素,从而促进了对该地区构造的修正。由于修订的结果,阿查那拉斯鱼床的位置现在是明确的。通道床群不再被认为是一个有意义的细分,因为它部分覆盖在鱼床上,部分覆盖在鱼床上。John o' Groats砂岩群被认为可能整合在凯斯内斯石板之上。主要的地层划分如下:D. John o' Groats砂岩群。c .上Caithness Flagstone群(c) Mey亚群(b) ham - scarfskery亚群(a) Latheron亚群。b .下Caithness石板群(Achanarras鱼床位置)(d)抢劫案头亚群(c) Lybster亚群(b) Hillhead红床亚群(a) Clyth亚群。A. Sarclet集团。印刷设备用于对边界被断层截断的构造和组进行正式描述。
8.—A Stratigraphical Revision of the Old Red Sandstone of North-eastern Caithness
Synopsis The stratigraphy of the Old Red Sandstone between Latheron and Brough in north-eastern Caithness has been revised. Stratigraphical subdivision in this area is primarily based on variations in lithology but is supported by the recognition of distinct faunal assemblages. The terms Wick Flagstone and Thurso Flagstone are discarded both as Group and Formation names and in their place type sequences different from those given by the Survey are proposed on the basis of the more continuous exposure seen between Ellens Goe and Latheron in eastern Caithness and in the Ham/Scarfskerry area of northern Caithness. The revision has been facilitated by an analysis of the structure of the area which suggests that a variable c. east-west compression has been the dominant controlling factor in the development of the structure of Caithness. As a result of the revision the position of the Achanarras Fish Bed is now clear. The Passage Beds Group is no longer considered a meaningful subdivision as it is partly overlain by and partly overlies this Fish Bed. The John o' Groats Sandstone Group is thought to probably overlie the Caithness Flagstones conformably. The following major stratigraphical subdivisions are recognised: D. John o' Groats Sandstone Group. C. Upper Caithness Flagstone Group (c) Mey Subgroup (b) Ham-Scarfskerry Subgroup (a) Latheron Subgroup. B. Lower Caithness Flagstone Group (position of Achanarras Fish Bed) (d) Robbery Head Subgroup (c) Lybster Subgroup (b) Hillhead Red Bed Subgroup (a) Clyth Subgroup. A. Sarclet Group. A typographical device is used for formal description of formations and groups whose boundaries are truncated by faults.