税收漏洞对加拿大个人和小企业行为的影响

Yahya Marei
{"title":"税收漏洞对加拿大个人和小企业行为的影响","authors":"Yahya Marei","doi":"10.4172/2375-4389.1000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies are applying different strategies to lower the amount of taxes they remit to the government, but the government seems to be getting lured to their intentions. A policy that came into effect in 2009 allowed Canada to sign agreements related to information exchange on tax with jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands, Isle of Man and Bermuda. The agreement had been intended to allow the government to flush out all individuals hiding their monies in offshore accounts. However, the agreement ended up creating a loophole for big companies to create subsidiaries within such jurisdictions and move their profits home without any form of tax levied on them. US multinationals are always obligated to pay tax wherever they get the international profits. In Canada however, the Tax Information Exchange Agreement shows that it is possible to declare profit generated in a tax haven, where there is very little or no tax, and take it back to the country without the company having to pay any more tax. As such tax treaties have for years encouraged a number of businesses not to operate in Barbados, where the rate of tax is between 1 and 2.5 percent, tax information exchange agreements are believed to have opened up a new chance for legal tax evasion in the zero-tax countries such as Panama, the Bahamas and Bermuda. A number of large corporations on the Stock Exchange of Toronto are now have some presence in tax havens and are applying the Canadian treaty to reduce the amount of tax they pay to the government back at home. MorganThomas reports that one company named Gildan reduced the amount of tax it paid to the government by more than 90 percent just in 2015.","PeriodicalId":73758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health economics and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Loopholes Impact on Canadian Individuals' and Small Business's Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Yahya Marei\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2375-4389.1000295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Companies are applying different strategies to lower the amount of taxes they remit to the government, but the government seems to be getting lured to their intentions. A policy that came into effect in 2009 allowed Canada to sign agreements related to information exchange on tax with jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands, Isle of Man and Bermuda. The agreement had been intended to allow the government to flush out all individuals hiding their monies in offshore accounts. However, the agreement ended up creating a loophole for big companies to create subsidiaries within such jurisdictions and move their profits home without any form of tax levied on them. US multinationals are always obligated to pay tax wherever they get the international profits. In Canada however, the Tax Information Exchange Agreement shows that it is possible to declare profit generated in a tax haven, where there is very little or no tax, and take it back to the country without the company having to pay any more tax. As such tax treaties have for years encouraged a number of businesses not to operate in Barbados, where the rate of tax is between 1 and 2.5 percent, tax information exchange agreements are believed to have opened up a new chance for legal tax evasion in the zero-tax countries such as Panama, the Bahamas and Bermuda. A number of large corporations on the Stock Exchange of Toronto are now have some presence in tax havens and are applying the Canadian treaty to reduce the amount of tax they pay to the government back at home. MorganThomas reports that one company named Gildan reduced the amount of tax it paid to the government by more than 90 percent just in 2015.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global health economics and policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global health economics and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4389.1000295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health economics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4389.1000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

企业为了减少向政府缴纳的税金,采取了各种各样的策略,但政府似乎被企业的意图所吸引。2009年生效的一项政策允许加拿大与开曼群岛、马恩岛和百慕大等司法管辖区签署有关税收信息交换的协议。该协议的目的是让政府查出所有在海外账户中隐藏资金的个人。然而,该协议最终为大公司创造了一个漏洞,它们可以在这些司法管辖区设立子公司,并将利润转移回国内,而不会对它们征收任何形式的税。美国跨国公司总是有义务在他们获得国际利润的地方纳税。然而,在加拿大,税收信息交换协议表明,有可能申报在避税天堂产生的利润,那里的税收很少或没有,并将其带回该国,而公司不必支付更多的税。由于这些税收协定多年来一直鼓励许多企业不在税率在1%至2.5%之间的巴巴多斯经营,税收信息交换协议被认为为在巴拿马、巴哈马和百慕大等零税收国家合法逃税开辟了新的机会。多伦多证券交易所(Stock Exchange of Toronto)的许多大公司现在在避税天堂有一些业务,它们正在申请加拿大条约,以减少向国内政府缴纳的税款。摩根托马斯报道称,一家名为Gildan的公司仅在2015年就将其向政府缴纳的税款减少了90%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tax Loopholes Impact on Canadian Individuals' and Small Business's Behaviour
Companies are applying different strategies to lower the amount of taxes they remit to the government, but the government seems to be getting lured to their intentions. A policy that came into effect in 2009 allowed Canada to sign agreements related to information exchange on tax with jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands, Isle of Man and Bermuda. The agreement had been intended to allow the government to flush out all individuals hiding their monies in offshore accounts. However, the agreement ended up creating a loophole for big companies to create subsidiaries within such jurisdictions and move their profits home without any form of tax levied on them. US multinationals are always obligated to pay tax wherever they get the international profits. In Canada however, the Tax Information Exchange Agreement shows that it is possible to declare profit generated in a tax haven, where there is very little or no tax, and take it back to the country without the company having to pay any more tax. As such tax treaties have for years encouraged a number of businesses not to operate in Barbados, where the rate of tax is between 1 and 2.5 percent, tax information exchange agreements are believed to have opened up a new chance for legal tax evasion in the zero-tax countries such as Panama, the Bahamas and Bermuda. A number of large corporations on the Stock Exchange of Toronto are now have some presence in tax havens and are applying the Canadian treaty to reduce the amount of tax they pay to the government back at home. MorganThomas reports that one company named Gildan reduced the amount of tax it paid to the government by more than 90 percent just in 2015.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The present value of human life losses associated with COVID-19 in South Africa The approach taken by Canada’s province of Nova Scotia to ban the sale of flavoured electronic cigarettes Use of population indices in cancer research: a scoping review Shaping market access for sustainable production of vaccines in Africa Using mobile health to strengthen the communication skills for effective delivery of health information in Nepal: A qualitative study of the perspectives of Female Community Health Volunteers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1