脑电额叶不对称对国家品牌和自有品牌产品购买的预测存在差异

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1037/npe0000094
U. Garczarek-Bąk, Aneta Disterheft
{"title":"脑电额叶不对称对国家品牌和自有品牌产品购买的预测存在差异","authors":"U. Garczarek-Bąk, Aneta Disterheft","doi":"10.1037/npe0000094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the following study show that among various neurophysiological measures, only the frontal asymmetry index measured with electroencephalography was significant in predicting further purchase decisions. The decision to buy was also influenced by the brand type (national brand or private label). Data from 21 participants were recorded during exposure to 20 fast-moving consumer goods. The electroencephalographic signal from the frontal lobe (F3 and F4) served to calculate the frontal asymmetry index for alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Electromyographic electrodes were placed on the zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii muscles, whereas the galvanic skin responses were gathered from the forefinger and ring finger of the nondominant hand. Eye tracking glasses were used to control for eye movements. After product exposure, participants filled in the Purchase Intentions Scale, which then served to assess the final binary decision. A logistic regression model was applied to determine which neurophysiological factors play a crucial role in predicting a purchase decision and whether the brand type is relevant. The prediction rate of the resulting model was 65.8%. The article describes the possible implications of these results.","PeriodicalId":45695,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","volume":"4 1","pages":"182–195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EEG Frontal Asymmetry Predicts Product Purchase Differently for National Brands and Private Labels\",\"authors\":\"U. Garczarek-Bąk, Aneta Disterheft\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/npe0000094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of the following study show that among various neurophysiological measures, only the frontal asymmetry index measured with electroencephalography was significant in predicting further purchase decisions. The decision to buy was also influenced by the brand type (national brand or private label). Data from 21 participants were recorded during exposure to 20 fast-moving consumer goods. The electroencephalographic signal from the frontal lobe (F3 and F4) served to calculate the frontal asymmetry index for alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Electromyographic electrodes were placed on the zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii muscles, whereas the galvanic skin responses were gathered from the forefinger and ring finger of the nondominant hand. Eye tracking glasses were used to control for eye movements. After product exposure, participants filled in the Purchase Intentions Scale, which then served to assess the final binary decision. A logistic regression model was applied to determine which neurophysiological factors play a crucial role in predicting a purchase decision and whether the brand type is relevant. The prediction rate of the resulting model was 65.8%. The article describes the possible implications of these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"182–195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

随后的研究结果表明,在各种神经生理指标中,只有脑电图测量的额叶不对称指数对进一步的购买决策有显著的预测作用。购买决定也受到品牌类型(国家品牌或自有品牌)的影响。研究人员记录了21名参与者在接触20种快速消费品时的数据。来自额叶(F3和F4)的脑电图信号用于计算α、β和γ波段的额叶不对称指数。肌电图电极放置在颧大肌和瓦楞肌上纤毛肌上,而皮肤电反应则从非优势手的食指和无名指收集。眼动追踪眼镜用于控制眼球运动。在产品暴露后,参与者填写购买意向量表,然后评估最终的二元决策。采用逻辑回归模型来确定哪些神经生理因素在预测购买决策中起关键作用,以及品牌类型是否相关。所得模型的预测率为65.8%。本文描述了这些结果可能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EEG Frontal Asymmetry Predicts Product Purchase Differently for National Brands and Private Labels
The results of the following study show that among various neurophysiological measures, only the frontal asymmetry index measured with electroencephalography was significant in predicting further purchase decisions. The decision to buy was also influenced by the brand type (national brand or private label). Data from 21 participants were recorded during exposure to 20 fast-moving consumer goods. The electroencephalographic signal from the frontal lobe (F3 and F4) served to calculate the frontal asymmetry index for alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Electromyographic electrodes were placed on the zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii muscles, whereas the galvanic skin responses were gathered from the forefinger and ring finger of the nondominant hand. Eye tracking glasses were used to control for eye movements. After product exposure, participants filled in the Purchase Intentions Scale, which then served to assess the final binary decision. A logistic regression model was applied to determine which neurophysiological factors play a crucial role in predicting a purchase decision and whether the brand type is relevant. The prediction rate of the resulting model was 65.8%. The article describes the possible implications of these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Self-reported and electroencephalogram responses to evaluate sponsorship congruence efficacy. Is geographical location really dead in the online world? An event-related potentials study. Motivating risky choices increases risk taking. Supplemental Material for From Genes to Performance: Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making in a Stock Market Simulation Supplemental Material for Motivating Risky Choices Increases Risk Taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1