利用机器学习和25年的地面观测减少ERA5再分析中的南大洋短波辐射误差

M. D. Mallet, S. Alexander, A. Protat, S. Fiddes
{"title":"利用机器学习和25年的地面观测减少ERA5再分析中的南大洋短波辐射误差","authors":"M. D. Mallet, S. Alexander, A. Protat, S. Fiddes","doi":"10.1175/aies-d-22-0044.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nEarth System models struggle to simulate clouds and their radiative effects over the Southern Ocean, partly due to a lack of measurements and targeted cloud microphysics knowledge. We have evaluated biases of downwelling shortwave radiation in the ERA5 climate reanalysis using 25 years (1995 - 2019) of summertime surface measurements, collected on the RSV Aurora Australis, the RV Investigator, and at Macquarie Island. During October - March daylight hours, the ERA5 simulation of SWdown exhibited large errors (mean bias = 54 Wm−2, mean absolute error = 82 Wm−2, root mean squared error = 132 Wm-2, R2 = 0.71). To determine whether we could improve these statistics, we bypassed ERA5’s radiative transfer model for SWdown with machine learning-based models using a number of ERA5’s grid-scale meteorological variables as predictors. These models were trained and tested with the surface measurements of SWdown using a 10-fold shuffle split. An XGBoost and a random forest-based model setup had the best performance relative to ERA5, both with a near complete reduction of the mean bias error, a decrease in the mean absolute error and root mean squared error by 25% ± 3 %, and an increase in the R2 value of 5% ± 1% over the 10 splits. Large improvements occurred at higher latitudes and cyclone cold-sectors, where ERA5 performed most poorly. We further interpret our methods using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Our results indicate that data-driven techniques could have an important role in simulating surface radiation fluxes and in improving reanalysis products.","PeriodicalId":94369,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Southern Ocean shortwave radiation errors in the ERA5 reanalysis with machine learning and 25 years of surface observations\",\"authors\":\"M. D. Mallet, S. Alexander, A. Protat, S. Fiddes\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/aies-d-22-0044.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nEarth System models struggle to simulate clouds and their radiative effects over the Southern Ocean, partly due to a lack of measurements and targeted cloud microphysics knowledge. We have evaluated biases of downwelling shortwave radiation in the ERA5 climate reanalysis using 25 years (1995 - 2019) of summertime surface measurements, collected on the RSV Aurora Australis, the RV Investigator, and at Macquarie Island. During October - March daylight hours, the ERA5 simulation of SWdown exhibited large errors (mean bias = 54 Wm−2, mean absolute error = 82 Wm−2, root mean squared error = 132 Wm-2, R2 = 0.71). To determine whether we could improve these statistics, we bypassed ERA5’s radiative transfer model for SWdown with machine learning-based models using a number of ERA5’s grid-scale meteorological variables as predictors. These models were trained and tested with the surface measurements of SWdown using a 10-fold shuffle split. An XGBoost and a random forest-based model setup had the best performance relative to ERA5, both with a near complete reduction of the mean bias error, a decrease in the mean absolute error and root mean squared error by 25% ± 3 %, and an increase in the R2 value of 5% ± 1% over the 10 splits. Large improvements occurred at higher latitudes and cyclone cold-sectors, where ERA5 performed most poorly. We further interpret our methods using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Our results indicate that data-driven techniques could have an important role in simulating surface radiation fluxes and in improving reanalysis products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-22-0044.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-22-0044.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

地球系统模型难以模拟云及其对南大洋的辐射效应,部分原因是缺乏测量和有针对性的云微物理知识。我们利用25年(1995 - 2019年)的夏季地表测量数据,评估了ERA5气候再分析中下行短波辐射的偏差,这些测量数据收集于RSV南极光号、RV研究者号和麦夸里岛。在10月至3月白天时段,ERA5对SWdown的模拟误差较大(平均偏差= 54 Wm-2,平均绝对误差= 82 Wm-2,均方根误差= 132 Wm-2, R2 = 0.71)。为了确定我们是否可以改善这些统计数据,我们使用基于机器学习的模型,使用一些ERA5的网格尺度气象变量作为预测因子,跳过了ERA5的SWdown辐射传输模型。这些模型通过使用10倍洗牌分割的SWdown表面测量进行训练和测试。相对于ERA5, XGBoost和基于随机森林的模型设置具有最好的性能,两者都几乎完全减小了平均偏置误差,平均绝对误差和均方根误差减少了25%±3%,R2值增加了5%±1%。在ERA5表现最差的高纬度地区和气旋寒冷地区出现了较大改善。我们使用SHapley加性解释进一步解释我们的方法。我们的结果表明,数据驱动技术在模拟表面辐射通量和改进再分析产品方面可以发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing Southern Ocean shortwave radiation errors in the ERA5 reanalysis with machine learning and 25 years of surface observations
Earth System models struggle to simulate clouds and their radiative effects over the Southern Ocean, partly due to a lack of measurements and targeted cloud microphysics knowledge. We have evaluated biases of downwelling shortwave radiation in the ERA5 climate reanalysis using 25 years (1995 - 2019) of summertime surface measurements, collected on the RSV Aurora Australis, the RV Investigator, and at Macquarie Island. During October - March daylight hours, the ERA5 simulation of SWdown exhibited large errors (mean bias = 54 Wm−2, mean absolute error = 82 Wm−2, root mean squared error = 132 Wm-2, R2 = 0.71). To determine whether we could improve these statistics, we bypassed ERA5’s radiative transfer model for SWdown with machine learning-based models using a number of ERA5’s grid-scale meteorological variables as predictors. These models were trained and tested with the surface measurements of SWdown using a 10-fold shuffle split. An XGBoost and a random forest-based model setup had the best performance relative to ERA5, both with a near complete reduction of the mean bias error, a decrease in the mean absolute error and root mean squared error by 25% ± 3 %, and an increase in the R2 value of 5% ± 1% over the 10 splits. Large improvements occurred at higher latitudes and cyclone cold-sectors, where ERA5 performed most poorly. We further interpret our methods using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Our results indicate that data-driven techniques could have an important role in simulating surface radiation fluxes and in improving reanalysis products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transferability and explainability of deep learning emulators for regional climate model projections: Perspectives for future applications Classification of ice particle shapes using machine learning on forward light scattering images Convolutional encoding and normalizing flows: a deep learning approach for offshore wind speed probabilistic forecasting in the Mediterranean Sea Neural networks to find the optimal forcing for offsetting the anthropogenic climate change effects Machine Learning Approach for Spatiotemporal Multivariate Optimization of Environmental Monitoring Sensor Locations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1