横膈膜研究:间皮瘤合理评估中的诊断和预后生物标志物

S. Tsim, C. Kelly, L. Alexander, A. Shaw, James Paul, R. Woodward, J. Foster, K. Blyth
{"title":"横膈膜研究:间皮瘤合理评估中的诊断和预后生物标志物","authors":"S. Tsim, C. Kelly, L. Alexander, A. Shaw, James Paul, R. Woodward, J. Foster, K. Blyth","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fibulin-3 (F3) and SOMAscan® (SS) are blood biomarkers with reported sensitivity and specificity >90% for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) but results are limited by inconsistent results and retrospective study design. The primary objective of DIAPHRAGM was to determine the diagnostic performance of F3 and SS in an adequately-powered, prospective study, compared to Mesothelin. Methods: DIAPHRAGM recruited an ‘intention-to-diagnose’ suspected pleural malignancy (SPM) cohort from 22 UK/Irish centres (Dec ’13 – Dec ‘16). Biomarker sampling simulated clinical use and diagnostic assessment was robust (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria were SPM (unilateral pleural effusion/mass), fit for sampling and consent. Patients with recent or in-situ chest drain were excluded. Target sample size was 600 SPM cases (including at least 120 MPM) and 109 asbestos-exposed controls (AEC). Results: 639 SPM and 109 AEC cases were recruited. 156 (24%) SPM patients had MPM, 213 (33 had secondary pleural malignancy and 241 (38%) benign disease. Final diagnoses are awaited in 5% (n=29). Biomarker assays are in progress. Complete results will be available by ERS congress. Conclusion: DIAPHRAGM was an appropriately-designed, multi-centre study that will clearly define the diagnostic performance of F3, SS and Mesothelin in MPM. A large, well-phenotyped bioresource has been created for future biomarker studies.","PeriodicalId":20113,"journal":{"name":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The DIAPHRAGM study: Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in the rational assessment of Mesothelioma\",\"authors\":\"S. Tsim, C. Kelly, L. Alexander, A. Shaw, James Paul, R. Woodward, J. Foster, K. Blyth\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Fibulin-3 (F3) and SOMAscan® (SS) are blood biomarkers with reported sensitivity and specificity >90% for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) but results are limited by inconsistent results and retrospective study design. The primary objective of DIAPHRAGM was to determine the diagnostic performance of F3 and SS in an adequately-powered, prospective study, compared to Mesothelin. Methods: DIAPHRAGM recruited an ‘intention-to-diagnose’ suspected pleural malignancy (SPM) cohort from 22 UK/Irish centres (Dec ’13 – Dec ‘16). Biomarker sampling simulated clinical use and diagnostic assessment was robust (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria were SPM (unilateral pleural effusion/mass), fit for sampling and consent. Patients with recent or in-situ chest drain were excluded. Target sample size was 600 SPM cases (including at least 120 MPM) and 109 asbestos-exposed controls (AEC). Results: 639 SPM and 109 AEC cases were recruited. 156 (24%) SPM patients had MPM, 213 (33 had secondary pleural malignancy and 241 (38%) benign disease. Final diagnoses are awaited in 5% (n=29). Biomarker assays are in progress. Complete results will be available by ERS congress. Conclusion: DIAPHRAGM was an appropriately-designed, multi-centre study that will clearly define the diagnostic performance of F3, SS and Mesothelin in MPM. A large, well-phenotyped bioresource has been created for future biomarker studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Fibulin-3 (F3)和SOMAscan®(SS)是血液生物标志物,据报道对恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的敏感性和特异性>90%,但由于结果不一致和回顾性研究设计,结果受到限制。膜片的主要目的是在一项足够有力的前瞻性研究中,与Mesothelin相比,确定F3和SS的诊断性能。方法:隔膜招募了来自22个英国/爱尔兰中心的“意图诊断”疑似胸膜恶性肿瘤(SPM)队列(2013年12月- 2016年12月)。生物标志物采样模拟临床使用和诊断评估是稳健的(图1)。纳入标准为SPM(单侧胸腔积液/肿块),适合采样和同意。排除近期或原位胸腔引流的患者。目标样本量为600例SPM病例(包括至少120例MPM)和109例石棉暴露对照(AEC)。结果:纳入SPM 639例,AEC 109例。156例(24%)SPM患者有MPM, 213例(33例)有继发性胸膜恶性肿瘤,241例(38%)有良性疾病。5%的患者等待最终诊断(n=29)。生物标志物检测正在进行中。完整的结果将在ERS大会上公布。结论:隔膜是一项设计合理的多中心研究,它将清楚地定义F3、SS和Mesothelin在MPM中的诊断作用。为未来的生物标志物研究创造了一个巨大的、表型良好的生物资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The DIAPHRAGM study: Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in the rational assessment of Mesothelioma
Introduction: Fibulin-3 (F3) and SOMAscan® (SS) are blood biomarkers with reported sensitivity and specificity >90% for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) but results are limited by inconsistent results and retrospective study design. The primary objective of DIAPHRAGM was to determine the diagnostic performance of F3 and SS in an adequately-powered, prospective study, compared to Mesothelin. Methods: DIAPHRAGM recruited an ‘intention-to-diagnose’ suspected pleural malignancy (SPM) cohort from 22 UK/Irish centres (Dec ’13 – Dec ‘16). Biomarker sampling simulated clinical use and diagnostic assessment was robust (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria were SPM (unilateral pleural effusion/mass), fit for sampling and consent. Patients with recent or in-situ chest drain were excluded. Target sample size was 600 SPM cases (including at least 120 MPM) and 109 asbestos-exposed controls (AEC). Results: 639 SPM and 109 AEC cases were recruited. 156 (24%) SPM patients had MPM, 213 (33 had secondary pleural malignancy and 241 (38%) benign disease. Final diagnoses are awaited in 5% (n=29). Biomarker assays are in progress. Complete results will be available by ERS congress. Conclusion: DIAPHRAGM was an appropriately-designed, multi-centre study that will clearly define the diagnostic performance of F3, SS and Mesothelin in MPM. A large, well-phenotyped bioresource has been created for future biomarker studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Success Rate of Pleurodesis with Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage Combined with Indwelling Pleural Catheter versus Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage in Patient with Malignant Pleural Effusion, A Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Patient derived malignant pleural effusion cell cultures as a platform to understand pleural malignancies and advance personalised treatment Variation in outcomes for M1a Stage Lung cacers- Outcome in Malingnat Pleural Effusion significantly worse than patients with Contralateral Lung Nodules Primary cilium modulates mesothelioma cell viability and 3D sphere formation Intracavitary anaesthesia for medical thoracoscopy: a randomised trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1