P. Chatelain, O. Malievskiy, K. Radziuk, G. Senatorova, Magdy O Abdou, E. Vlachopapadopoulou, Y. Skorodok, V. Peterkova, J. Leff, M. Beckert
{"title":"儿童生长激素缺乏症中长效TransCon生长激素与每日生长激素的随机2期研究","authors":"P. Chatelain, O. Malievskiy, K. Radziuk, G. Senatorova, Magdy O Abdou, E. Vlachopapadopoulou, Y. Skorodok, V. Peterkova, J. Leff, M. Beckert","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-3776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context\nTransCon Growth Hormone (GH) (Ascendis Pharma) is a long-acting recombinant sustained-release human GH prodrug in development for children with GH deficiency (GHD).\n\n\nObjective\nTo compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of weekly TransCon GH to that of daily GH in prepubertal children with GHD.\n\n\nDesign\nRandomized, open-label, active-controlled study of three doses of weekly TransCon GH versus daily Genotropin (Pfizer).\n\n\nSetting\nThirty-eight centers in 14 European countries and Egypt.\n\n\nPatients\nPrepubertal male and female treatment-naïve children with GHD (n = 53).\n\n\nInterventions\nSubjects received one of three TransCon GH doses (0.14, 0.21, or 0.30 mg GH/kg/wk) or Genotropin 0.03 mg GH/kg/d for 26 weeks.\n\n\nMain Outcome Measures\nGH and insulinlike growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, growth, adverse events, and immunogenicity.\n\n\nResults\nBoth GH maximum concentration and area under the curve were similar following TransCon GH or Genotropin administration at comparable doses. A dose response was observed, with IGF-1 standard deviation scores increasing into the normal range for all three TransCon GH doses. Annualized mean height velocity for the three TransCon GH doses ranged from 11.9 cm to 13.9 cm, which was not statistically different from 11.6 cm for Genotropin. Adverse events were mild to moderate, and most were unrelated to the study drug. Injection site tolerance was good. One TransCon GH subject developed a low-titer, nonneutralizing antibody response to GH.\n\n\nConclusions\nThe results suggest that long-acting TransCon GH is comparable to daily Genotropin for GH (pharmacokinetics) and IGF-1 (pharmacodynamics) levels, safety, and efficacy and support advancement into phase 3 development.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"23 1","pages":"1673–1682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Long-Acting TransCon GH vs Daily GH in Childhood GH Deficiency\",\"authors\":\"P. Chatelain, O. Malievskiy, K. Radziuk, G. Senatorova, Magdy O Abdou, E. Vlachopapadopoulou, Y. Skorodok, V. Peterkova, J. Leff, M. Beckert\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jc.2016-3776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context\\nTransCon Growth Hormone (GH) (Ascendis Pharma) is a long-acting recombinant sustained-release human GH prodrug in development for children with GH deficiency (GHD).\\n\\n\\nObjective\\nTo compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of weekly TransCon GH to that of daily GH in prepubertal children with GHD.\\n\\n\\nDesign\\nRandomized, open-label, active-controlled study of three doses of weekly TransCon GH versus daily Genotropin (Pfizer).\\n\\n\\nSetting\\nThirty-eight centers in 14 European countries and Egypt.\\n\\n\\nPatients\\nPrepubertal male and female treatment-naïve children with GHD (n = 53).\\n\\n\\nInterventions\\nSubjects received one of three TransCon GH doses (0.14, 0.21, or 0.30 mg GH/kg/wk) or Genotropin 0.03 mg GH/kg/d for 26 weeks.\\n\\n\\nMain Outcome Measures\\nGH and insulinlike growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, growth, adverse events, and immunogenicity.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nBoth GH maximum concentration and area under the curve were similar following TransCon GH or Genotropin administration at comparable doses. A dose response was observed, with IGF-1 standard deviation scores increasing into the normal range for all three TransCon GH doses. Annualized mean height velocity for the three TransCon GH doses ranged from 11.9 cm to 13.9 cm, which was not statistically different from 11.6 cm for Genotropin. Adverse events were mild to moderate, and most were unrelated to the study drug. Injection site tolerance was good. One TransCon GH subject developed a low-titer, nonneutralizing antibody response to GH.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nThe results suggest that long-acting TransCon GH is comparable to daily Genotropin for GH (pharmacokinetics) and IGF-1 (pharmacodynamics) levels, safety, and efficacy and support advancement into phase 3 development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1673–1682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Long-Acting TransCon GH vs Daily GH in Childhood GH Deficiency
Context
TransCon Growth Hormone (GH) (Ascendis Pharma) is a long-acting recombinant sustained-release human GH prodrug in development for children with GH deficiency (GHD).
Objective
To compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of weekly TransCon GH to that of daily GH in prepubertal children with GHD.
Design
Randomized, open-label, active-controlled study of three doses of weekly TransCon GH versus daily Genotropin (Pfizer).
Setting
Thirty-eight centers in 14 European countries and Egypt.
Patients
Prepubertal male and female treatment-naïve children with GHD (n = 53).
Interventions
Subjects received one of three TransCon GH doses (0.14, 0.21, or 0.30 mg GH/kg/wk) or Genotropin 0.03 mg GH/kg/d for 26 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures
GH and insulinlike growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, growth, adverse events, and immunogenicity.
Results
Both GH maximum concentration and area under the curve were similar following TransCon GH or Genotropin administration at comparable doses. A dose response was observed, with IGF-1 standard deviation scores increasing into the normal range for all three TransCon GH doses. Annualized mean height velocity for the three TransCon GH doses ranged from 11.9 cm to 13.9 cm, which was not statistically different from 11.6 cm for Genotropin. Adverse events were mild to moderate, and most were unrelated to the study drug. Injection site tolerance was good. One TransCon GH subject developed a low-titer, nonneutralizing antibody response to GH.
Conclusions
The results suggest that long-acting TransCon GH is comparable to daily Genotropin for GH (pharmacokinetics) and IGF-1 (pharmacodynamics) levels, safety, and efficacy and support advancement into phase 3 development.