O81 IMpower110:一项III期研究的中期总生存期(OS)分析:atezolizumab (ATEZO)单药治疗与铂基化疗(CHEMO)作为pd - l1选择的非小细胞肺癌一线(1L)治疗

R. Herbst, F. Marinis, G. Giaccone, N. Reinmuth, A. Vergnenègre, C. Barrios, M. Morise, E. Font, Z. Andrić, Sarayut Lucien Geater, M. Ozguroglu, S. Mocci, M. McCleland, I. Enquist, K. Komatsubara, Y. Deng, H. Kuriki, X. Wen, J. Jassem, D. Spigel
{"title":"O81 IMpower110:一项III期研究的中期总生存期(OS)分析:atezolizumab (ATEZO)单药治疗与铂基化疗(CHEMO)作为pd - l1选择的非小细胞肺癌一线(1L)治疗","authors":"R. Herbst, F. Marinis, G. Giaccone, N. Reinmuth, A. Vergnenègre, C. Barrios, M. Morise, E. Font, Z. Andrić, Sarayut Lucien Geater, M. Ozguroglu, S. Mocci, M. McCleland, I. Enquist, K. Komatsubara, Y. Deng, H. Kuriki, X. Wen, J. Jassem, D. Spigel","doi":"10.1136/LBA2019.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors (CPI) as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based doublet chemo (± bevacizumab) are 1L treatment options in metastatic NSCLC, with choice of agent(s) determined by PD-L1 expression. For patients (pts) who may be ineligible for combination therapy, CPI monotherapy remains an attractive treatment choice. IMpower110 evaluated atezo as 1L treatment in PD-L1–selected pts independent of tumor histology. Methods IMpower110 enrolled 572 chemo-naive pts with stage IV nonsquamous (nsq) or squamous (sq) NSCLC, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% on TC or IC, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo 1200 mg IV q3w (Arm A) or platinum-based chemo (Arm B; 4 or 6 21-day cycles). Arm B nsq pts received cisplatin (cis) 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV q3w; Arm B sq pts received cis 75 mg/m2 + gemcitabine (gem) 1250 mg/m2 or carbo AUC 5 + gem 1000 mg/m2 IV q3w. Stratification factors were sex, ECOG PS, histology and tumor PD-L1 status (TC1/2/3 and any IC vs TC0 and IC1/2/3). The primary endpoint of OS is tested hierarchically in the wild-type (WT; EGFR/ALK-negative) population (TC3 or IC3 then TC2/3 or IC2/3 then TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3). Results The 3 primary efficacy populations included 554 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 WT pts, 328 TC2/3 or IC2/3 WT pts and 205 TC3 or IC3 WT pts. Median follow-up was 15.7 months (range, 0-35) in TC3 or IC3 WT pts. In the TC3 or IC3 WT population, atezo monotherapy improved median OS by 7.1 months (HR, 0.595; P = 0.0106) compared with chemo (table 1). The safety population comprised 286 pts in Arm A and 263 in Arm B. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 60.5% (Arm A) and 85.2% (Arm B), and 12.9% (Arm A) and 44.1% (Arm B), respectively. Abstract 081 Table 1 Conclusions At this interim analysis, IMpower110 met the primary endpoint of OS with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the TC3 or IC3 WT population. The safety profile favored Arm A, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified. Trial Registration NCT02409342 Ethics Approval The trial was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent. Protocol approval was obtained from independent review boards or ethics committees at each site.","PeriodicalId":16067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer","volume":"14 1","pages":"A1 - A1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O81 IMpower110: interim overall survival (OS) analysis of a phase III study of atezolizumab (ATEZO) monotherapy vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CHEMO) as first-line (1L) treatment in PD-L1–selected NSCLC\",\"authors\":\"R. Herbst, F. Marinis, G. Giaccone, N. Reinmuth, A. Vergnenègre, C. Barrios, M. Morise, E. Font, Z. Andrić, Sarayut Lucien Geater, M. Ozguroglu, S. Mocci, M. McCleland, I. Enquist, K. Komatsubara, Y. Deng, H. Kuriki, X. Wen, J. Jassem, D. Spigel\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/LBA2019.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors (CPI) as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based doublet chemo (± bevacizumab) are 1L treatment options in metastatic NSCLC, with choice of agent(s) determined by PD-L1 expression. For patients (pts) who may be ineligible for combination therapy, CPI monotherapy remains an attractive treatment choice. IMpower110 evaluated atezo as 1L treatment in PD-L1–selected pts independent of tumor histology. Methods IMpower110 enrolled 572 chemo-naive pts with stage IV nonsquamous (nsq) or squamous (sq) NSCLC, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% on TC or IC, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo 1200 mg IV q3w (Arm A) or platinum-based chemo (Arm B; 4 or 6 21-day cycles). Arm B nsq pts received cisplatin (cis) 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV q3w; Arm B sq pts received cis 75 mg/m2 + gemcitabine (gem) 1250 mg/m2 or carbo AUC 5 + gem 1000 mg/m2 IV q3w. Stratification factors were sex, ECOG PS, histology and tumor PD-L1 status (TC1/2/3 and any IC vs TC0 and IC1/2/3). The primary endpoint of OS is tested hierarchically in the wild-type (WT; EGFR/ALK-negative) population (TC3 or IC3 then TC2/3 or IC2/3 then TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3). Results The 3 primary efficacy populations included 554 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 WT pts, 328 TC2/3 or IC2/3 WT pts and 205 TC3 or IC3 WT pts. Median follow-up was 15.7 months (range, 0-35) in TC3 or IC3 WT pts. In the TC3 or IC3 WT population, atezo monotherapy improved median OS by 7.1 months (HR, 0.595; P = 0.0106) compared with chemo (table 1). The safety population comprised 286 pts in Arm A and 263 in Arm B. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 60.5% (Arm A) and 85.2% (Arm B), and 12.9% (Arm A) and 44.1% (Arm B), respectively. Abstract 081 Table 1 Conclusions At this interim analysis, IMpower110 met the primary endpoint of OS with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the TC3 or IC3 WT population. The safety profile favored Arm A, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified. Trial Registration NCT02409342 Ethics Approval The trial was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent. Protocol approval was obtained from independent review boards or ethics committees at each site.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"A1 - A1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/LBA2019.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/LBA2019.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

PD-L1/PD-1抑制剂(CPI)作为单药治疗或与铂基双药化疗(±贝伐单抗)联合治疗是转移性NSCLC的1L治疗选择,药物的选择取决于PD-L1的表达。对于可能不适合联合治疗的患者,CPI单药治疗仍然是一种有吸引力的治疗选择。IMpower110评估了atezo在独立于肿瘤组织学的pd - l1选择患者中的1L治疗效果。方法IMpower110招募了572名IV期非鳞状(nsq)或鳞状(sq) NSCLC患者,TC或IC时PD-L1表达≥1%,RECIST 1.1和ECOG PS 0-1可测量疾病。患者按1:1随机分配,接受atezo 1200mg IV q3w (A组)或铂基化疗(B组;4或6个21天周期)。B组患者接受顺铂(cis) 75 mg/m2或卡铂(carbo) AUC 6 +培美曲塞500 mg/m2 IV q3w;B组患者接受顺式75 mg/m2 +吉西他滨(宝石)1250 mg/m2或碳AUC 5 +宝石1000 mg/m2 IV, q3w。分层因素为性别、ECOG PS、组织学和肿瘤PD-L1状态(TC1/2/3和任何IC vs TC0和IC1/2/3)。在野生型(WT;EGFR/ alk阴性)人群(TC3或IC3然后是TC2/3或IC2/3然后是TC1/2/3或IC1/2/3)。结果3个主要有效人群包括554例TC1/2/3或IC1/2/3 WT患者,328例tc1 /2或IC2/3 WT患者和205例TC3或IC3 WT患者。TC3或IC3 WT患者的中位随访时间为15.7个月(范围0-35)。在TC3或IC3 WT人群中,阿特佐单药治疗使中位总生存期延长7.1个月(HR, 0.595;P = 0.0106)(表1)。A组286人,B组263人。治疗相关ae (TRAEs)和3-4级TRAEs分别发生在60.5% (A组)和85.2% (B组),12.9% (A组)和44.1% (B组)。在这个中期分析中,IMpower110达到了主要的OS终点,在TC3或IC3 WT人群中具有统计学意义和临床意义的改善。安全概况有利于Arm A,没有发现新的或意外的安全信号。试验注册NCT02409342伦理批准试验按照《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则进行。所有患者均提供书面知情同意书。方案的批准由每个地点的独立审查委员会或伦理委员会获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O81 IMpower110: interim overall survival (OS) analysis of a phase III study of atezolizumab (ATEZO) monotherapy vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CHEMO) as first-line (1L) treatment in PD-L1–selected NSCLC
Background PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors (CPI) as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based doublet chemo (± bevacizumab) are 1L treatment options in metastatic NSCLC, with choice of agent(s) determined by PD-L1 expression. For patients (pts) who may be ineligible for combination therapy, CPI monotherapy remains an attractive treatment choice. IMpower110 evaluated atezo as 1L treatment in PD-L1–selected pts independent of tumor histology. Methods IMpower110 enrolled 572 chemo-naive pts with stage IV nonsquamous (nsq) or squamous (sq) NSCLC, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% on TC or IC, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo 1200 mg IV q3w (Arm A) or platinum-based chemo (Arm B; 4 or 6 21-day cycles). Arm B nsq pts received cisplatin (cis) 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV q3w; Arm B sq pts received cis 75 mg/m2 + gemcitabine (gem) 1250 mg/m2 or carbo AUC 5 + gem 1000 mg/m2 IV q3w. Stratification factors were sex, ECOG PS, histology and tumor PD-L1 status (TC1/2/3 and any IC vs TC0 and IC1/2/3). The primary endpoint of OS is tested hierarchically in the wild-type (WT; EGFR/ALK-negative) population (TC3 or IC3 then TC2/3 or IC2/3 then TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3). Results The 3 primary efficacy populations included 554 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 WT pts, 328 TC2/3 or IC2/3 WT pts and 205 TC3 or IC3 WT pts. Median follow-up was 15.7 months (range, 0-35) in TC3 or IC3 WT pts. In the TC3 or IC3 WT population, atezo monotherapy improved median OS by 7.1 months (HR, 0.595; P = 0.0106) compared with chemo (table 1). The safety population comprised 286 pts in Arm A and 263 in Arm B. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 60.5% (Arm A) and 85.2% (Arm B), and 12.9% (Arm A) and 44.1% (Arm B), respectively. Abstract 081 Table 1 Conclusions At this interim analysis, IMpower110 met the primary endpoint of OS with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the TC3 or IC3 WT population. The safety profile favored Arm A, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified. Trial Registration NCT02409342 Ethics Approval The trial was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent. Protocol approval was obtained from independent review boards or ethics committees at each site.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Early disappearance of tumor antigen-reactive T cells from peripheral blood correlates with superior clinical outcomes in melanoma under anti-PD-1 therapy P857 ONM-500 – a novel STING-activating therapeutic nanovaccine platform for cancer immunotherapy P853 Single cell transcriptome analysis identifies unique features in circulating CD8+ T cells that can predict immunotherapy response in melanoma patients O83 Phase 1 study of an anti-CD27 agonist as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors P859 Association of immunopharmacodynamic responses of imprime PGG plus pembrolizumab with clinical benefit in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subjects failing front-line chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1