明尼苏达量表在慢性心力衰竭患者随访中的有效性

Gustavo Palomino , Maria J. Pareja , Maria C. Pareja , Natalia Nevado , Fernán Mendoza , Fabián A. Dávila , Claudia Jaramillo
{"title":"明尼苏达量表在慢性心力衰竭患者随访中的有效性","authors":"Gustavo Palomino ,&nbsp;Maria J. Pareja ,&nbsp;Maria C. Pareja ,&nbsp;Natalia Nevado ,&nbsp;Fernán Mendoza ,&nbsp;Fabián A. Dávila ,&nbsp;Claudia Jaramillo","doi":"10.1016/j.carcor.2017.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a widely used scale to measure quality of life in patients with heart failure. The aim of the study was to analyse the usefulness of the MLHFQ in the follow-up of patients with chronic heart failure and establish the relationship with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and ejection fraction.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 172 records, we presented general characteristics, assessed the internal validity and reliability and explored differences between the overall outcomes and by domain vs. ejection fraction and NYHA functional class.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age of the patients was 63 (57; 72) years, with a predominance of males (67.4%). Fifty-one point one percent had an ejection fraction<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->40%. The reliability coefficients in the 3 domains were<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.6; the physical domain was the most affected; significant differences were found in ejection fraction in the «Others» domain. Regarding the NYHA admission, significant differences were observed in 3 domains, we found lower quality of life in patients with a higher NYHA score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The MLHFQ proved to be reliable and valid in measuring the quality of life in patients with heart failure by demonstrating lower quality of life in patients who had worse functional class; comparing the quality of life of patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction, only differences were found in one domain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100216,"journal":{"name":"Cardiocore","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carcor.2017.09.005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilidad de la Escala de Minnesota en el seguimiento de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Palomino ,&nbsp;Maria J. Pareja ,&nbsp;Maria C. Pareja ,&nbsp;Natalia Nevado ,&nbsp;Fernán Mendoza ,&nbsp;Fabián A. Dávila ,&nbsp;Claudia Jaramillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carcor.2017.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a widely used scale to measure quality of life in patients with heart failure. The aim of the study was to analyse the usefulness of the MLHFQ in the follow-up of patients with chronic heart failure and establish the relationship with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and ejection fraction.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 172 records, we presented general characteristics, assessed the internal validity and reliability and explored differences between the overall outcomes and by domain vs. ejection fraction and NYHA functional class.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age of the patients was 63 (57; 72) years, with a predominance of males (67.4%). Fifty-one point one percent had an ejection fraction<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->40%. The reliability coefficients in the 3 domains were<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.6; the physical domain was the most affected; significant differences were found in ejection fraction in the «Others» domain. Regarding the NYHA admission, significant differences were observed in 3 domains, we found lower quality of life in patients with a higher NYHA score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The MLHFQ proved to be reliable and valid in measuring the quality of life in patients with heart failure by demonstrating lower quality of life in patients who had worse functional class; comparing the quality of life of patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction, only differences were found in one domain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiocore\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carcor.2017.09.005\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiocore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1889898X17300889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiocore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1889898X17300889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

明尼苏达州心衰患者生活问卷(MLHFQ)是一种广泛应用于心衰患者生活质量的量表。本研究的目的是分析MLHFQ在慢性心力衰竭患者随访中的实用性,并建立其与纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级和射血分数的关系。材料和方法我们回顾了172份记录,我们提出了一般特征,评估了内部效度和信度,并探讨了总体结果之间的差异,通过域与射血分数和NYHA功能分类。结果患者年龄中位数为63岁(57岁;72岁,男性居多(67.4%)。51.1%的患者有射血分数;40%。3个域的信度系数分别为>0.6;物理域受影响最大;在«Others»区域的射血分数有显著差异。关于NYHA入院,在3个方面观察到显著差异,我们发现NYHA评分较高的患者生活质量较低。结论MLHFQ通过显示功能等级较差的心衰患者的生活质量较低,证明其在衡量心衰患者生活质量方面是可靠和有效的;比较保留和降低射血分数患者的生活质量,只在一个领域发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilidad de la Escala de Minnesota en el seguimiento de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica

Introduction

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a widely used scale to measure quality of life in patients with heart failure. The aim of the study was to analyse the usefulness of the MLHFQ in the follow-up of patients with chronic heart failure and establish the relationship with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and ejection fraction.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 172 records, we presented general characteristics, assessed the internal validity and reliability and explored differences between the overall outcomes and by domain vs. ejection fraction and NYHA functional class.

Results

The median age of the patients was 63 (57; 72) years, with a predominance of males (67.4%). Fifty-one point one percent had an ejection fraction < 40%. The reliability coefficients in the 3 domains were > 0.6; the physical domain was the most affected; significant differences were found in ejection fraction in the «Others» domain. Regarding the NYHA admission, significant differences were observed in 3 domains, we found lower quality of life in patients with a higher NYHA score.

Conclusions

The MLHFQ proved to be reliable and valid in measuring the quality of life in patients with heart failure by demonstrating lower quality of life in patients who had worse functional class; comparing the quality of life of patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction, only differences were found in one domain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flecainida y ergometría, ¿aliados o enemigos? ¿Cree que el TAVI va a acabar con la cirugía? Síndrome de marcapasos evaluado mediante ecocardiografía Paraganglioma como causa de taquicardia ventricular maligna en un varón de 69 años Implantación de la prótesis CoreValve® como tratamiento de un homoinjerto valvular aórtico disfuncionante con insuficiencia aórtica predominante
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1