atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib联合和nivolumab + ipilimumab联合的临床和经济评价:转移性黑色素瘤治疗成人患者braf确认突变

I. Krysanov, E. Makarova, V. Ermakova
{"title":"atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib联合和nivolumab + ipilimumab联合的临床和经济评价:转移性黑色素瘤治疗成人患者braf确认突变","authors":"I. Krysanov, E. Makarova, V. Ermakova","doi":"10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-3-278-288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the atezolizumab, vemurofenib and cobimetinib (ATZ+VM+COB) combination and the nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) combination for the treatment of BRAF-confirmed metastatic melanoma in adult patients.Materials and methods. With the help of mathematical modeling methods, a pharmacoeconomic “cost-effectiveness” analysis; a “budget impact” analysis; a sensitivity analysis to the changes in the initial parameters of the model, were carried out.Results. The analysis of literature sources made it possible to conclude that the combination of ATZ+VM+COB compared with the combination of NIVO+IPI (15.1 and 11.2 months, respectively) has a greater clinical efficacy in terms of a progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma. When choosing the ATZ+VM+COB combination, the total cost of treatment for one adult patient with metastatic melanoma per course was lower, compared to the NIVO+IPI combination (RUB 8 326 864.89 vs RUB 7 172 751.68); the difference amounted to 1 154 113.21 rubles. When calculating the “cost-effectiveness” ratio for a year of a progression-free survival, the advantage of the ATZ + VM + COB combination in comparison with the NIVO + IPI combination, remained (5 700 200.01 rubles vs 8 942 400.10 rubles); the difference amounted to 3 242 200.09 rubles. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the developed model stability to an increase in the cost of the ATZ + VM + COB course up to + 16%, a decrease in the cost of the NIVO + IPI course to –13%, and a reduction in the PFS to –37% against the background of the ATZ + VM + COB course. The “budget impact” analysis showed the possibility of reducing costs by 8 655 849.11 rubles with an increase from 5% to 20% in the proportion of the patients administrated with the ATZ+VM+COB combination, and with a decrease from 95% to 80% in the proportion of the patients administrated with the NIVO+IPI combination.Conclusion. The results of the work have shown that within the healthcare system of the Russian Federation, the triple combination of ATZ+VM+COB is a clinically cost-effective option for the treatment of adult metastatic melanoma patients with a confirmed BRAF mutation.","PeriodicalId":20031,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology & Pharmacy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ATEZOLIZUMAB + VEMURAFENIB + COBIMETINIB COMBINATION AND NIVOLUMAB + IPILIMUMAB COMBINATION: ADMINISTRATION IN METASTATIC MELANOMA TREATMENT WITH BRAF-CONFIRMED MUTATION IN ADULT PATIENTS\",\"authors\":\"I. Krysanov, E. Makarova, V. Ermakova\",\"doi\":\"10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-3-278-288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the atezolizumab, vemurofenib and cobimetinib (ATZ+VM+COB) combination and the nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) combination for the treatment of BRAF-confirmed metastatic melanoma in adult patients.Materials and methods. With the help of mathematical modeling methods, a pharmacoeconomic “cost-effectiveness” analysis; a “budget impact” analysis; a sensitivity analysis to the changes in the initial parameters of the model, were carried out.Results. The analysis of literature sources made it possible to conclude that the combination of ATZ+VM+COB compared with the combination of NIVO+IPI (15.1 and 11.2 months, respectively) has a greater clinical efficacy in terms of a progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma. When choosing the ATZ+VM+COB combination, the total cost of treatment for one adult patient with metastatic melanoma per course was lower, compared to the NIVO+IPI combination (RUB 8 326 864.89 vs RUB 7 172 751.68); the difference amounted to 1 154 113.21 rubles. When calculating the “cost-effectiveness” ratio for a year of a progression-free survival, the advantage of the ATZ + VM + COB combination in comparison with the NIVO + IPI combination, remained (5 700 200.01 rubles vs 8 942 400.10 rubles); the difference amounted to 3 242 200.09 rubles. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the developed model stability to an increase in the cost of the ATZ + VM + COB course up to + 16%, a decrease in the cost of the NIVO + IPI course to –13%, and a reduction in the PFS to –37% against the background of the ATZ + VM + COB course. The “budget impact” analysis showed the possibility of reducing costs by 8 655 849.11 rubles with an increase from 5% to 20% in the proportion of the patients administrated with the ATZ+VM+COB combination, and with a decrease from 95% to 80% in the proportion of the patients administrated with the NIVO+IPI combination.Conclusion. The results of the work have shown that within the healthcare system of the Russian Federation, the triple combination of ATZ+VM+COB is a clinically cost-effective option for the treatment of adult metastatic melanoma patients with a confirmed BRAF mutation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacology & Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacology & Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-3-278-288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology & Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-3-278-288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

该研究的目的是对atezolizumab, vemurofenib和cobimetinib (ATZ+VM+COB)组合以及nivolumab和ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI)组合治疗成人braf确诊的转移性黑色素瘤进行药物经济学评估。材料和方法。借助数学建模方法,进行药物经济学“成本-效果”分析;“预算影响”分析;对模型初始参数的变化进行了敏感性分析。通过对文献资料的分析,我们可以得出结论,ATZ+VM+COB联合治疗比NIVO+IPI联合治疗(分别为15.1个月和11.2个月)在转移性黑色素瘤患者的无进展生存期(PFS)方面具有更大的临床疗效。当选择ATZ+VM+COB联合治疗时,与NIVO+IPI联合治疗相比,一名成年转移性黑色素瘤患者每疗程的总治疗成本更低(8 326 864.89卢布vs 7 172 751.68卢布);差额为1 154 113.21卢布。在计算无进展生存期一年的“成本效益”比率时,与NIVO + IPI组合相比,ATZ + VM + COB组合的优势仍然存在(5 700 200.01卢布对8 942 400.10卢布);差额为3 242 200.09卢布。敏感性分析表明,在ATZ + VM + COB过程的背景下,开发的模型稳定性可以将ATZ + VM + COB过程的成本增加到+ 16%,将NIVO + IPI过程的成本降低到-13%,将PFS降低到-37%。“预算影响”分析显示,ATZ+VM+COB联合用药的患者比例从5%增加到20%,NIVO+IPI联合用药的患者比例从95%减少到80%,可降低成本8 655 849.11卢布。研究结果表明,在俄罗斯联邦的医疗保健系统内,ATZ+VM+COB的三联疗法是治疗确诊BRAF突变的成人转移性黑色素瘤患者的临床成本效益选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ATEZOLIZUMAB + VEMURAFENIB + COBIMETINIB COMBINATION AND NIVOLUMAB + IPILIMUMAB COMBINATION: ADMINISTRATION IN METASTATIC MELANOMA TREATMENT WITH BRAF-CONFIRMED MUTATION IN ADULT PATIENTS
The aim of the study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the atezolizumab, vemurofenib and cobimetinib (ATZ+VM+COB) combination and the nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) combination for the treatment of BRAF-confirmed metastatic melanoma in adult patients.Materials and methods. With the help of mathematical modeling methods, a pharmacoeconomic “cost-effectiveness” analysis; a “budget impact” analysis; a sensitivity analysis to the changes in the initial parameters of the model, were carried out.Results. The analysis of literature sources made it possible to conclude that the combination of ATZ+VM+COB compared with the combination of NIVO+IPI (15.1 and 11.2 months, respectively) has a greater clinical efficacy in terms of a progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma. When choosing the ATZ+VM+COB combination, the total cost of treatment for one adult patient with metastatic melanoma per course was lower, compared to the NIVO+IPI combination (RUB 8 326 864.89 vs RUB 7 172 751.68); the difference amounted to 1 154 113.21 rubles. When calculating the “cost-effectiveness” ratio for a year of a progression-free survival, the advantage of the ATZ + VM + COB combination in comparison with the NIVO + IPI combination, remained (5 700 200.01 rubles vs 8 942 400.10 rubles); the difference amounted to 3 242 200.09 rubles. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the developed model stability to an increase in the cost of the ATZ + VM + COB course up to + 16%, a decrease in the cost of the NIVO + IPI course to –13%, and a reduction in the PFS to –37% against the background of the ATZ + VM + COB course. The “budget impact” analysis showed the possibility of reducing costs by 8 655 849.11 rubles with an increase from 5% to 20% in the proportion of the patients administrated with the ATZ+VM+COB combination, and with a decrease from 95% to 80% in the proportion of the patients administrated with the NIVO+IPI combination.Conclusion. The results of the work have shown that within the healthcare system of the Russian Federation, the triple combination of ATZ+VM+COB is a clinically cost-effective option for the treatment of adult metastatic melanoma patients with a confirmed BRAF mutation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative determination of total flavonoids in Glycyrrhiza Glabra L. herbs New role of extemporaneous manufacturing in regulating drug products access onto the market “Off-label” drugs: legal problems and socio-economic aspects of application practice Analysis of cytokine response characteristics and immunopathogenetic effects of double-stranded sodium salt RNA-based drug for postexposure prophylaxis against novel coronavirus infection: double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Development of composition and technology for obtaining antimicrobial composition based on mono- and sesquiterpenoids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1