在南非法律中,扑杀大象会被视为不人道和非法吗?:一个回应和进一步的思考

W. Lubbe, R. Alberts, Jacquelyn P. Robinson, I. Rushworth, SA Jeanetta Selier, Li Tanneback, Sam M. Ferreira
{"title":"在南非法律中,扑杀大象会被视为不人道和非法吗?:一个回应和进一步的思考","authors":"W. Lubbe, R. Alberts, Jacquelyn P. Robinson, I. Rushworth, SA Jeanetta Selier, Li Tanneback, Sam M. Ferreira","doi":"10.1080/13880292.2023.2217616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Culling of certain species remains a sensitive topic. This is especially true when considering the culling of so-called sentient animals like elephants. This article builds on a previous paper published in this Journal and aims to both agree and disagree with some of the arguments raised. Primarily this article raises concerns about what was termed the potential illegality of elephant culling in South African law. In doing so, a summary of the arguments not contested and also those contested is presented; a discussion of the ‘legality’ of culling is presented; the exclusion of conservation imperatives from the original paper is examined; a legal synopsis of welfare and rights within the South African Constitution is presented; and finally concluding remarks is made together with thoughts on future research.","PeriodicalId":52446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Could Culling of Elephants be Considered Inhumane and Illegal in South African Law?’: A Response and Further Thoughts\",\"authors\":\"W. Lubbe, R. Alberts, Jacquelyn P. Robinson, I. Rushworth, SA Jeanetta Selier, Li Tanneback, Sam M. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13880292.2023.2217616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Culling of certain species remains a sensitive topic. This is especially true when considering the culling of so-called sentient animals like elephants. This article builds on a previous paper published in this Journal and aims to both agree and disagree with some of the arguments raised. Primarily this article raises concerns about what was termed the potential illegality of elephant culling in South African law. In doing so, a summary of the arguments not contested and also those contested is presented; a discussion of the ‘legality’ of culling is presented; the exclusion of conservation imperatives from the original paper is examined; a legal synopsis of welfare and rights within the South African Constitution is presented; and finally concluding remarks is made together with thoughts on future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2023.2217616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2023.2217616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

某些物种的淘汰仍然是一个敏感的话题。考虑到对大象等所谓有感情的动物的捕杀,这一点尤其正确。这篇文章建立在之前发表在《华尔街日报》上的一篇论文的基础上,旨在同意和不同意提出的一些论点。这篇文章首先提出了对南非法律中所谓的潜在非法大象捕杀的关注。在此过程中,对没有争议的论点和有争议的论点进行了总结;对扑杀的“合法性”进行了讨论;对原论文中排除守恒命令的问题进行了研究;提出了《南非宪法》范围内的福利和权利的法律概要;最后进行了结束语,并对今后的研究进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Could Culling of Elephants be Considered Inhumane and Illegal in South African Law?’: A Response and Further Thoughts
Abstract Culling of certain species remains a sensitive topic. This is especially true when considering the culling of so-called sentient animals like elephants. This article builds on a previous paper published in this Journal and aims to both agree and disagree with some of the arguments raised. Primarily this article raises concerns about what was termed the potential illegality of elephant culling in South African law. In doing so, a summary of the arguments not contested and also those contested is presented; a discussion of the ‘legality’ of culling is presented; the exclusion of conservation imperatives from the original paper is examined; a legal synopsis of welfare and rights within the South African Constitution is presented; and finally concluding remarks is made together with thoughts on future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Drawing upon the findings from island biogeography studies, Norman Myers estimates that we are losing between 50-200 species per day, a rate 120,000 times greater than the background rate during prehistoric times. Worse still, the rate is accelerating rapidly. By the year 2000, we may have lost over one million species, counting back from three centuries ago when this trend began. By the middle of the next century, as many as one half of all species may face extinction. Moreover, our rapid destruction of critical ecosystems, such as tropical coral reefs, wetlands, estuaries, and rainforests may seriously impair species" regeneration, a process that has taken several million years after mass extinctions in the past.
期刊最新文献
Lost in Translation? Why Outdated Notions of Normativity in International Law Explain Germany’s Failure to Give Effect to the Ramsar Convention of 1971 Wild Things: Animal Rights in EU Conservation Law Addressing Illegal Transnational Trade of Totoaba and Its Role in the Possible Extinction of the Vaquita Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility Carceral Logics: Human Incarceration and Animal Captivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1