包容的伪装:“非理想”学生在白人至上主义的异性父权教育体系中的生存

Leslie Ekpe, Whitney Roach
{"title":"包容的伪装:“非理想”学生在白人至上主义的异性父权教育体系中的生存","authors":"Leslie Ekpe, Whitney Roach","doi":"10.1177/10526846221149219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its inception, the United States (U.S.) education system has worked vigorously to stymie and subvert the needs of those deemed to be ‘non-ideal’ (Grumet, 1998; Apple, 2006). From maintaining exclusionary curricula to the manipulation of anti-racist approaches to practice, heteropatriarchal white supremacist structures of education ensure a label of ‘Other’ for those who fail to meet colonial ideals (Pinar, 1998). Marginalized students and practitioners—those who are Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual+ (LGBTQIA+), people with disabilities, and those with low socioeconomic status (SES), are, as Cathy J. Cohen (2005) suggests queer outliers throughout systems of education. To address exclusionary practices, this article underscores the guise of diversity in schooling and its material impacts on those deemed not ideal. By implementing Critical Race Theory (CRT) (Crenshaw, 1995) and Queer of Color Critique (QOCC) (Ferguson, 2004) within counterstorytelling (Crenshaw, 1988; Morris & Perry, 2016), the authors of this manuscript—both cisgender women: (1) heterosexual and Black, and (1) queer and white—share their respective experiences with(in) academic violence(s). The authors’ narrative explorations interrogate individual and aggregate relationships to educational heteronormative Whiteness (Ahmed, 2007; Love, 2019) and establish pathways for educational leaders to reimagine anti-racist, pro-queer, wholly inclusive educational practices.","PeriodicalId":92928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of school leadership","volume":"60 1","pages":"179 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Guise of Inclusion: The Survival of ‘Non-Ideal’ Students in White Supremacist Heteropatriarchal Systems of Education\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Ekpe, Whitney Roach\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10526846221149219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since its inception, the United States (U.S.) education system has worked vigorously to stymie and subvert the needs of those deemed to be ‘non-ideal’ (Grumet, 1998; Apple, 2006). From maintaining exclusionary curricula to the manipulation of anti-racist approaches to practice, heteropatriarchal white supremacist structures of education ensure a label of ‘Other’ for those who fail to meet colonial ideals (Pinar, 1998). Marginalized students and practitioners—those who are Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual+ (LGBTQIA+), people with disabilities, and those with low socioeconomic status (SES), are, as Cathy J. Cohen (2005) suggests queer outliers throughout systems of education. To address exclusionary practices, this article underscores the guise of diversity in schooling and its material impacts on those deemed not ideal. By implementing Critical Race Theory (CRT) (Crenshaw, 1995) and Queer of Color Critique (QOCC) (Ferguson, 2004) within counterstorytelling (Crenshaw, 1988; Morris & Perry, 2016), the authors of this manuscript—both cisgender women: (1) heterosexual and Black, and (1) queer and white—share their respective experiences with(in) academic violence(s). The authors’ narrative explorations interrogate individual and aggregate relationships to educational heteronormative Whiteness (Ahmed, 2007; Love, 2019) and establish pathways for educational leaders to reimagine anti-racist, pro-queer, wholly inclusive educational practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of school leadership\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of school leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221149219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of school leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221149219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自成立以来,美国的教育系统一直在大力阻碍和颠覆那些被认为是“非理想”的需求(Grumet, 1998;苹果,2006)。从维持排他性的课程到操纵反种族主义的实践方法,异性父权制的白人至上主义教育结构为那些未能满足殖民理想的人贴上了“他者”的标签(Pinar, 1998)。被边缘化的学生和从业人员——黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、有疑问的人、双性人、无性人+ (LGBTQIA+)、残疾人和社会经济地位低的人(SES)——正如Cathy J. Cohen(2005)所指出的那样,在整个教育系统中都是酷儿的局外人。为了解决排斥性做法,本文强调了学校教育多样性的幌子及其对那些被认为不理想的人的重大影响。通过在反叙事中实施批判种族理论(CRT) (Crenshaw, 1995)和有色酷儿批判(QOCC) (Ferguson, 2004) (Crenshaw, 1988;Morris & Perry, 2016),这篇手稿的作者——都是顺性别女性:(1)异性恋和黑人,(1)酷儿和白人——分享了她们各自在学术暴力方面的经历。作者的叙事探索探究了个人和集体与教育异性恋白人的关系(Ahmed, 2007;爱,2019),并为教育领导者重新构想反种族主义,支持酷儿,完全包容的教育实践建立途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Guise of Inclusion: The Survival of ‘Non-Ideal’ Students in White Supremacist Heteropatriarchal Systems of Education
Since its inception, the United States (U.S.) education system has worked vigorously to stymie and subvert the needs of those deemed to be ‘non-ideal’ (Grumet, 1998; Apple, 2006). From maintaining exclusionary curricula to the manipulation of anti-racist approaches to practice, heteropatriarchal white supremacist structures of education ensure a label of ‘Other’ for those who fail to meet colonial ideals (Pinar, 1998). Marginalized students and practitioners—those who are Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual+ (LGBTQIA+), people with disabilities, and those with low socioeconomic status (SES), are, as Cathy J. Cohen (2005) suggests queer outliers throughout systems of education. To address exclusionary practices, this article underscores the guise of diversity in schooling and its material impacts on those deemed not ideal. By implementing Critical Race Theory (CRT) (Crenshaw, 1995) and Queer of Color Critique (QOCC) (Ferguson, 2004) within counterstorytelling (Crenshaw, 1988; Morris & Perry, 2016), the authors of this manuscript—both cisgender women: (1) heterosexual and Black, and (1) queer and white—share their respective experiences with(in) academic violence(s). The authors’ narrative explorations interrogate individual and aggregate relationships to educational heteronormative Whiteness (Ahmed, 2007; Love, 2019) and establish pathways for educational leaders to reimagine anti-racist, pro-queer, wholly inclusive educational practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instructional Program Coherence: A Structural Support for Teacher Psychological Needs Principals’ Discursive Framing and Communications and Educators’ Job Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic The Effect of Middle Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity on Team Performance and Conflict Management Through Middle Leaders’ Positive Perception of Diversity Academic Culture: Its Meaning, Measure and Contribution to Student Learning Navigating Emotional Discomfort in Developing Equity-Driven School Leaders: A Conceptual-Pedagogical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1