为安全风险评估探索风险流攻击图

Fangfang Dai, Yingwu Hu, K. Zheng, Bin Wu
{"title":"为安全风险评估探索风险流攻击图","authors":"Fangfang Dai, Yingwu Hu, K. Zheng, Bin Wu","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have previously looked into the problem of determining the connection between invasive events and network risk, and attack graph (AG) was proposed to seek countermeasures. However, AG has proved to have various limitations in practical applications. To overcome such defects, this study presents a risk flow attack graph (RFAG)-based risk assessment approach. In particular, this approach applies a RFAG to represent network and attack scenarios, which are then fed to a network flow model for computing risk flow. A bi-objective sorting algorithm is employed to automatically infer the priority of risk paths and assist risk assessment, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is performed to determine risk severity. Via the aforementioned processes, the authors simplify AG and follow the risk path of originating, transferring, redistributing and converging to assess security risk. The authors use a synthetic network scenario to illustrate this approach and evaluate its performance through a set of simulations. Experiments show that the approach is capable of effectively identifying network security situations and assessing critical risk.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":"7 1","pages":"344-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring risk flow attack graph for security risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Fangfang Dai, Yingwu Hu, K. Zheng, Bin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers have previously looked into the problem of determining the connection between invasive events and network risk, and attack graph (AG) was proposed to seek countermeasures. However, AG has proved to have various limitations in practical applications. To overcome such defects, this study presents a risk flow attack graph (RFAG)-based risk assessment approach. In particular, this approach applies a RFAG to represent network and attack scenarios, which are then fed to a network flow model for computing risk flow. A bi-objective sorting algorithm is employed to automatically infer the priority of risk paths and assist risk assessment, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is performed to determine risk severity. Via the aforementioned processes, the authors simplify AG and follow the risk path of originating, transferring, redistributing and converging to assess security risk. The authors use a synthetic network scenario to illustrate this approach and evaluate its performance through a set of simulations. Experiments show that the approach is capable of effectively identifying network security situations and assessing critical risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"344-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

研究人员已经研究了入侵事件与网络风险之间联系的确定问题,并提出了攻击图(attack graph, AG)来寻求对策。然而,AG在实际应用中已被证明存在各种局限性。为了克服这些缺陷,本研究提出了一种基于风险流攻击图(RFAG)的风险评估方法。特别是,该方法应用RFAG来表示网络和攻击场景,然后将其提供给网络流模型以计算风险流。采用双目标排序算法自动推断风险路径的优先级并辅助风险评估,采用模糊综合评判法确定风险严重程度。通过上述过程,对AG进行简化,并遵循起源-转移-再分配-汇聚的风险路径进行安全风险评估。作者使用一个合成网络场景来说明该方法,并通过一组仿真来评估其性能。实验表明,该方法能够有效地识别网络安全状况并评估关键风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring risk flow attack graph for security risk assessment
Researchers have previously looked into the problem of determining the connection between invasive events and network risk, and attack graph (AG) was proposed to seek countermeasures. However, AG has proved to have various limitations in practical applications. To overcome such defects, this study presents a risk flow attack graph (RFAG)-based risk assessment approach. In particular, this approach applies a RFAG to represent network and attack scenarios, which are then fed to a network flow model for computing risk flow. A bi-objective sorting algorithm is employed to automatically infer the priority of risk paths and assist risk assessment, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is performed to determine risk severity. Via the aforementioned processes, the authors simplify AG and follow the risk path of originating, transferring, redistributing and converging to assess security risk. The authors use a synthetic network scenario to illustrate this approach and evaluate its performance through a set of simulations. Experiments show that the approach is capable of effectively identifying network security situations and assessing critical risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisit Two Memoryless State-Recovery Cryptanalysis Methods on A5/1 Improved Lattice-Based Mix-Nets for Electronic Voting Adaptive and survivable trust management for Internet of Things systems Comment on 'Targeted Ciphers for Format-Preserving Encryption' from Selected Areas in Cryptography 2018 Time-specific encrypted range query with minimum leakage disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1