在常规治疗的基础上增加转移能量、电容性和电阻性治疗对斜方肌上肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效:一项随机临床试验

Parisa Taheri MD, Soroush Sadri MD, Razieh Maghroori MD
{"title":"在常规治疗的基础上增加转移能量、电容性和电阻性治疗对斜方肌上肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Parisa Taheri MD,&nbsp;Soroush Sadri MD,&nbsp;Razieh Maghroori MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of adding transfer energy capacitive and resistive (TECAR) therapy to conventional therapy on patients’ symptoms of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the upper trapezius.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Fifty patients with MPS in the upper trapezius were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group received TECAR therapy (capacitive mode, 2 sessions weekly), and conventional treatment comprised of stretching exercise (9 times a day) and medication (acetaminophen and tizanidine) for 3 weeks, and the comparison group received conventional treatment (same as the intervention group) alone. The patients completed the Numeric Pain Scale, </span>Neck Disability Index, and </span>Shoulder Pain and Disability Index before, after, and 1 month after the treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All variables were significantly reduced within both groups by time and treatment separately (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), while a general comparison among the groups showed a significant reduction for all variables in the intervention group compared with the comparison group (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) except for shoulder disability (<em>P</em><span> = .114). Moreover, the intervention group had better results compared with the comparison group based on the minimal clinically important difference.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A combination of TECAR therapy, exercise, and medication substantially reduced symptom severity for patients with MPS in the upper trapezius when compared to only exercise and medication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Adding Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive Therapy to Conventional Therapy for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Upper Trapezius: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Taheri MD,&nbsp;Soroush Sadri MD,&nbsp;Razieh Maghroori MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of adding transfer energy capacitive and resistive (TECAR) therapy to conventional therapy on patients’ symptoms of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the upper trapezius.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Fifty patients with MPS in the upper trapezius were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group received TECAR therapy (capacitive mode, 2 sessions weekly), and conventional treatment comprised of stretching exercise (9 times a day) and medication (acetaminophen and tizanidine) for 3 weeks, and the comparison group received conventional treatment (same as the intervention group) alone. The patients completed the Numeric Pain Scale, </span>Neck Disability Index, and </span>Shoulder Pain and Disability Index before, after, and 1 month after the treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All variables were significantly reduced within both groups by time and treatment separately (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), while a general comparison among the groups showed a significant reduction for all variables in the intervention group compared with the comparison group (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) except for shoulder disability (<em>P</em><span> = .114). Moreover, the intervention group had better results compared with the comparison group based on the minimal clinically important difference.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A combination of TECAR therapy, exercise, and medication substantially reduced symptom severity for patients with MPS in the upper trapezius when compared to only exercise and medication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较在斜方肌上肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)患者的症状上,加入转移能量电容性和电阻性(TECAR)疗法与常规疗法的效果。方法将50例上斜方肌MPS患者随机分为2组。干预组给予TECAR治疗(电容式,每周2次),常规治疗包括伸展运动(每天9次)和药物(对乙酰氨基酚和替扎尼定),持续3周,对照组单独给予常规治疗(与干预组相同)。患者在治疗前、治疗后和治疗后1个月分别完成数字疼痛量表、颈部残疾指数、肩部疼痛和残疾指数。结果两组患者经时间和治疗后各项指标均显著降低(P <.001),而组间的一般比较显示,干预组与对照组相比,所有变量均显著降低(P <.05),肩部残疾除外(P = .114)。此外,干预组在临床重要差异极小的基础上优于对照组。结论与单纯运动和药物治疗相比,TECAR治疗、运动和药物联合治疗可显著减轻斜方肌上段MPS患者的症状严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Adding Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive Therapy to Conventional Therapy for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Upper Trapezius: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of adding transfer energy capacitive and resistive (TECAR) therapy to conventional therapy on patients’ symptoms of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the upper trapezius.

Methods

Fifty patients with MPS in the upper trapezius were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group received TECAR therapy (capacitive mode, 2 sessions weekly), and conventional treatment comprised of stretching exercise (9 times a day) and medication (acetaminophen and tizanidine) for 3 weeks, and the comparison group received conventional treatment (same as the intervention group) alone. The patients completed the Numeric Pain Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index before, after, and 1 month after the treatment.

Results

All variables were significantly reduced within both groups by time and treatment separately (P < .001), while a general comparison among the groups showed a significant reduction for all variables in the intervention group compared with the comparison group (P < .05) except for shoulder disability (P = .114). Moreover, the intervention group had better results compared with the comparison group based on the minimal clinically important difference.

Conclusion

A combination of TECAR therapy, exercise, and medication substantially reduced symptom severity for patients with MPS in the upper trapezius when compared to only exercise and medication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1