{"title":"澳大利亚宪法中作为反歧视条款的宗教考试条款","authors":"Luke Beck","doi":"10.26180/5DB807D8695D1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the religious tests clause of s 116 of the Australian Constitution should be conceived of as an anti-discrimination provision embracing a distinction between direct and indirect religious tests equivalent to the distinction between direct and indirect discrimination in other bodies of law. In other words, a religious test exists where there is discrimination, either directly or indirectly, on the ground of religion. The article develops this interpretation using a functionalist comparative analysis with other bodies of law, including European human rights law, American equal protection jurisprudence and Australian anti-discrimination law.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"545-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Australian Constitution's Religious Tests Clause as an Anti-Discrimination Provision\",\"authors\":\"Luke Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.26180/5DB807D8695D1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that the religious tests clause of s 116 of the Australian Constitution should be conceived of as an anti-discrimination provision embracing a distinction between direct and indirect religious tests equivalent to the distinction between direct and indirect discrimination in other bodies of law. In other words, a religious test exists where there is discrimination, either directly or indirectly, on the ground of religion. The article develops this interpretation using a functionalist comparative analysis with other bodies of law, including European human rights law, American equal protection jurisprudence and Australian anti-discrimination law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monash University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"545-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monash University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB807D8695D1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB807D8695D1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Australian Constitution's Religious Tests Clause as an Anti-Discrimination Provision
This article argues that the religious tests clause of s 116 of the Australian Constitution should be conceived of as an anti-discrimination provision embracing a distinction between direct and indirect religious tests equivalent to the distinction between direct and indirect discrimination in other bodies of law. In other words, a religious test exists where there is discrimination, either directly or indirectly, on the ground of religion. The article develops this interpretation using a functionalist comparative analysis with other bodies of law, including European human rights law, American equal protection jurisprudence and Australian anti-discrimination law.