近度量图中旅行商问题的逼近算法分析

S. Krug
{"title":"近度量图中旅行商问题的逼近算法分析","authors":"S. Krug","doi":"10.3929/ETHZ-A-006519144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the beta-metric traveling salesman problem (Delta-beta-TSP), i.e., the TSP restricted to input instances satisfying the beta-triangle inequality c({v,w}) <= beta * (c{v,u} + c{u,w}), for any three vertices u,v,w. The well-known path matching Christofides algorithm (PMCA) provides an approximation ratio of 3/2 * beta^2 and is the best known algorithm in the range 1 <= beta <= 2. We show that this upper bound is tight by providing a worst-case example. This example can also be used to show the tightness of the upper bound for the PMCA variants for the Hamiltonian path problem with zero and one prespecified endpoints. For two prespecified endpoints, we cannot reuse the example, but we construct another worst-case example to show the tightness of the upper bound also in this case. Furthermore, we establish improved lower bounds for an approximation algorithm for the metric Hamiltonian path problem as well as for two approximation algorithms for the metric TSP reoptimization problem.","PeriodicalId":10841,"journal":{"name":"CTIT technical reports series","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of approximation algorithms for the traveling salesman problem in near-metric graphs\",\"authors\":\"S. Krug\",\"doi\":\"10.3929/ETHZ-A-006519144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the beta-metric traveling salesman problem (Delta-beta-TSP), i.e., the TSP restricted to input instances satisfying the beta-triangle inequality c({v,w}) <= beta * (c{v,u} + c{u,w}), for any three vertices u,v,w. The well-known path matching Christofides algorithm (PMCA) provides an approximation ratio of 3/2 * beta^2 and is the best known algorithm in the range 1 <= beta <= 2. We show that this upper bound is tight by providing a worst-case example. This example can also be used to show the tightness of the upper bound for the PMCA variants for the Hamiltonian path problem with zero and one prespecified endpoints. For two prespecified endpoints, we cannot reuse the example, but we construct another worst-case example to show the tightness of the upper bound also in this case. Furthermore, we establish improved lower bounds for an approximation algorithm for the metric Hamiltonian path problem as well as for two approximation algorithms for the metric TSP reoptimization problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CTIT technical reports series\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CTIT technical reports series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-006519144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CTIT technical reports series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-006519144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们考虑β -度量旅行商问题(delta - β -TSP),即TSP被限制为满足β -三角形不等式c({v,w}) <= β * (c{v,u} + c{u,w})的输入实例,对于任意三个顶点u,v,w。众所周知的路径匹配Christofides算法(PMCA)提供了3/2 * beta^2的近似值,是1 <= beta <= 2范围内最著名的算法。我们通过提供一个最坏情况的例子来证明这个上界是紧的。这个例子还可以用来显示具有零和一个预先指定端点的哈密顿路径问题的PMCA变体上界的紧密性。对于两个预先指定的端点,我们不能重用这个例子,但是我们构造了另一个最坏情况的例子来显示在这种情况下上界的紧密性。此外,我们还建立了度量哈密顿路径问题的一种近似算法和度量TSP再优化问题的两种近似算法的改进下界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of approximation algorithms for the traveling salesman problem in near-metric graphs
We consider the beta-metric traveling salesman problem (Delta-beta-TSP), i.e., the TSP restricted to input instances satisfying the beta-triangle inequality c({v,w}) <= beta * (c{v,u} + c{u,w}), for any three vertices u,v,w. The well-known path matching Christofides algorithm (PMCA) provides an approximation ratio of 3/2 * beta^2 and is the best known algorithm in the range 1 <= beta <= 2. We show that this upper bound is tight by providing a worst-case example. This example can also be used to show the tightness of the upper bound for the PMCA variants for the Hamiltonian path problem with zero and one prespecified endpoints. For two prespecified endpoints, we cannot reuse the example, but we construct another worst-case example to show the tightness of the upper bound also in this case. Furthermore, we establish improved lower bounds for an approximation algorithm for the metric Hamiltonian path problem as well as for two approximation algorithms for the metric TSP reoptimization problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Costs and Benefits of Electric Vehicles and District Cooling Systems: A case study in Singapore Towards a Digital Urban Climate Twin: Simulation-as-a-Service (SaaS) for Model Integration Microscale Assessment of the Anthropogenic Heat Mitigation Strategies Decision Support System: User research, usability analysis and computational build Analysis of climatic variables in different urban sites of Singapore and evaluation of strategies to improve the outdoor thermal environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1