2016年糖尿病用药,2015年内分泌学变化。赫策尔·格斯坦博士在接受罗曼·杰斯克博士的采访时说。

H. Gerstein, R. Jaeschke
{"title":"2016年糖尿病用药,2015年内分泌学变化。赫策尔·格斯坦博士在接受罗曼·杰斯克博士的采访时说。","authors":"H. Gerstein, R. Jaeschke","doi":"10.20452/pamw.3663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That was all there was. Now we have 12 class‐ es in the United States—in other countries it is about 10 or 11. That to me is wonderful; it means that we have choice and it means that we can tai‐ lor more the therapy to the individual patients that we have. Several of the drugs we have cause weight loss as a side effect: actually 2 of them, sodium ‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibi‐ tors and the glucagon ‐like peptide (GLP)‐1 recep‐ tor agonists do have a weight loss effect. Many of the drugs do not cause hypoglycemia and very few cause weight gain now. The only drugs that cause a little bit of weight gain are sulfonylureas and insulin, and thiazolidinediones, which are not used that often today. I think most people would not argue that unless there was a contra‐ indication or people could not tolerate the drug, people today should probably be taking metfor‐ min as an agent for diabetes for lots of reasons, including its long safety record, the fact that it may be associated with a lower risk of cardiovas‐ cular events and other outcomes, and that it has really proven itself over the years. After that, I think it depends on how hyper‐ glycemic the patient is and what their comorbidi‐ ties are. If they have renal failure, you cannot use many drugs; if they have a very low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), insulin is probably the only safe drug to use for people with a low GFR. If they are very hyperglycemic, you are probably wise to start with insulin right away or in addition to met‐ formin because you have to lower their blood glu‐ cose levels and get them down quickly; if they are at high cardiovascular risk, I think empagliflozin is a reasonable drug. If weight loss is an impor‐ tant criterion, then one can consider GLP ‐1 recep‐ tor agonist plus empagliflozin. If they had previ‐ ous pancreatitis, then you would not want to use the drugs that have concerns about pancreatitis, like the incretins‐ipeptidyl peptidase ‐4 (DPP ‐4) inhibitors. So I guess I do not have an easy an‐ swer for the question. There are also issues of In a previous interview,1 you told us about empagliflozin. How about the other classes of drugs used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Which one would you say we use—I do not know whether it could be said—routinely, regularly? I know already that there is no such thing as an average patient.","PeriodicalId":20343,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","volume":"61 6 1","pages":"907-908"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drugs in diabetes in 2016, changes in endocrinology in 2015. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein in an interview with Dr. Roman Jaeschke.\",\"authors\":\"H. Gerstein, R. Jaeschke\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/pamw.3663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"That was all there was. Now we have 12 class‐ es in the United States—in other countries it is about 10 or 11. That to me is wonderful; it means that we have choice and it means that we can tai‐ lor more the therapy to the individual patients that we have. Several of the drugs we have cause weight loss as a side effect: actually 2 of them, sodium ‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibi‐ tors and the glucagon ‐like peptide (GLP)‐1 recep‐ tor agonists do have a weight loss effect. Many of the drugs do not cause hypoglycemia and very few cause weight gain now. The only drugs that cause a little bit of weight gain are sulfonylureas and insulin, and thiazolidinediones, which are not used that often today. I think most people would not argue that unless there was a contra‐ indication or people could not tolerate the drug, people today should probably be taking metfor‐ min as an agent for diabetes for lots of reasons, including its long safety record, the fact that it may be associated with a lower risk of cardiovas‐ cular events and other outcomes, and that it has really proven itself over the years. After that, I think it depends on how hyper‐ glycemic the patient is and what their comorbidi‐ ties are. If they have renal failure, you cannot use many drugs; if they have a very low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), insulin is probably the only safe drug to use for people with a low GFR. If they are very hyperglycemic, you are probably wise to start with insulin right away or in addition to met‐ formin because you have to lower their blood glu‐ cose levels and get them down quickly; if they are at high cardiovascular risk, I think empagliflozin is a reasonable drug. If weight loss is an impor‐ tant criterion, then one can consider GLP ‐1 recep‐ tor agonist plus empagliflozin. If they had previ‐ ous pancreatitis, then you would not want to use the drugs that have concerns about pancreatitis, like the incretins‐ipeptidyl peptidase ‐4 (DPP ‐4) inhibitors. So I guess I do not have an easy an‐ swer for the question. There are also issues of In a previous interview,1 you told us about empagliflozin. How about the other classes of drugs used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Which one would you say we use—I do not know whether it could be said—routinely, regularly? I know already that there is no such thing as an average patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej\",\"volume\":\"61 6 1\",\"pages\":\"907-908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这就是全部。现在我们在美国有12个班级,在其他国家大约是10或11个。这对我来说是美妙的;这意味着我们有更多的选择,意味着我们可以针对不同的病人进行更多的治疗。我们使用的几种药物都有导致体重减轻的副作用:实际上其中的两种,钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽(GLP) - 1雷杰普受体激动剂确实有减肥效果。许多药物不会导致低血糖,现在很少有药物会导致体重增加。唯一会导致体重增加的药物是磺脲类药物和胰岛素,以及噻唑烷二酮类药物,这些药物现在并不经常使用。我想大多数人不会争辩说,除非有反指症或人们不能耐受这种药物,否则今天的人们可能应该服用甲替明作为治疗糖尿病的药物,原因有很多,包括它长期的安全记录,它可能与较低的心血管事件和其他后果的风险有关,而且多年来它确实证明了自己。在那之后,我认为这取决于患者的高血糖程度和他们的合并症是什么。如果他们有肾衰竭,你不能使用很多药物;如果他们的肾小球滤过率(GFR)很低,胰岛素可能是唯一安全的药物用于低GFR的人。如果他们的血糖非常高,你可能明智的做法是立即开始使用胰岛素,或者在使用双胍的同时使用胰岛素,因为你必须降低他们的血糖水平,并使其迅速下降;如果他们有较高的心血管风险,我认为恩格列净是一种合理的药物。如果体重减轻是一个重要的标准,那么可以考虑GLP - 1雷杰普受体激动剂加恩格列净。如果患者既往患有胰腺炎,那么就不要使用与胰腺炎有关的药物,如肠促胰岛素-胰肽基肽酶- 4 (DPP - 4)抑制剂。所以我想我没有一个简单的答案来回答这个问题。在之前的采访中,你告诉了我们关于恩帕列净的问题。那治疗2型糖尿病的其他药物呢?你说我们用哪一种——我不知道是否可以这么说——例行公事,有规律?我已经知道没有所谓的一般病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drugs in diabetes in 2016, changes in endocrinology in 2015. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein in an interview with Dr. Roman Jaeschke.
That was all there was. Now we have 12 class‐ es in the United States—in other countries it is about 10 or 11. That to me is wonderful; it means that we have choice and it means that we can tai‐ lor more the therapy to the individual patients that we have. Several of the drugs we have cause weight loss as a side effect: actually 2 of them, sodium ‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibi‐ tors and the glucagon ‐like peptide (GLP)‐1 recep‐ tor agonists do have a weight loss effect. Many of the drugs do not cause hypoglycemia and very few cause weight gain now. The only drugs that cause a little bit of weight gain are sulfonylureas and insulin, and thiazolidinediones, which are not used that often today. I think most people would not argue that unless there was a contra‐ indication or people could not tolerate the drug, people today should probably be taking metfor‐ min as an agent for diabetes for lots of reasons, including its long safety record, the fact that it may be associated with a lower risk of cardiovas‐ cular events and other outcomes, and that it has really proven itself over the years. After that, I think it depends on how hyper‐ glycemic the patient is and what their comorbidi‐ ties are. If they have renal failure, you cannot use many drugs; if they have a very low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), insulin is probably the only safe drug to use for people with a low GFR. If they are very hyperglycemic, you are probably wise to start with insulin right away or in addition to met‐ formin because you have to lower their blood glu‐ cose levels and get them down quickly; if they are at high cardiovascular risk, I think empagliflozin is a reasonable drug. If weight loss is an impor‐ tant criterion, then one can consider GLP ‐1 recep‐ tor agonist plus empagliflozin. If they had previ‐ ous pancreatitis, then you would not want to use the drugs that have concerns about pancreatitis, like the incretins‐ipeptidyl peptidase ‐4 (DPP ‐4) inhibitors. So I guess I do not have an easy an‐ swer for the question. There are also issues of In a previous interview,1 you told us about empagliflozin. How about the other classes of drugs used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Which one would you say we use—I do not know whether it could be said—routinely, regularly? I know already that there is no such thing as an average patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Relapsing polychondritis]. [Inclusion body myositis]. [Nephrotic syndrome]. [Mesangium]. [Hepatorenal syndrome].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1