学校文化话语:来自学习科学研究的元综合

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information and Learning Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1108/ils-11-2021-0103
Yotam Hod, O. Sagy
{"title":"学校文化话语:来自学习科学研究的元综合","authors":"Yotam Hod, O. Sagy","doi":"10.1108/ils-11-2021-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEnculturation is a central and defining idea within socioculturally minded research that informs the design of school learning environments. Now, three decades since the idea has emerged in the field, the authors believe it is time to reflect on it because of several ambiguities that have emerged from its use, which is the purpose of this study\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors carried out a metasynthesis of learning scientists’ school enculturation discourse. This included reviewing the concept within 84 articles found in six leading and relevant learning sciences journals.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study’s findings show that school enculturation discourse is divided between those that view it unidirectionally, bidirectionally or both, and that three reifications of associated cultures (authentic, designed and traditional) together with various conduits frame the way learning environments are designed to facilitate enculturation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis metasynthesis can help advance sociocultural research in schools by clarifying the meaning and conceptualization of a central idea in the field.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study can help teachers and educational researchers clarify the role that culture has in the designs of their learning environments.\n\n\nSocial implications\nCulture is a vital facet of learning; designers of learning environments need to understand the way culture interplays with learning.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs this research shows, current school enculturation discourse is vague and often appears to be applied inconsistently. It is vital for any field to reflect on its own discourse to sharpen the conceptual tools that it uses so that it can advance.\n","PeriodicalId":44588,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School enculturation discourse: a meta synthesis from research in the learning sciences\",\"authors\":\"Yotam Hod, O. Sagy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ils-11-2021-0103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nEnculturation is a central and defining idea within socioculturally minded research that informs the design of school learning environments. Now, three decades since the idea has emerged in the field, the authors believe it is time to reflect on it because of several ambiguities that have emerged from its use, which is the purpose of this study\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors carried out a metasynthesis of learning scientists’ school enculturation discourse. This included reviewing the concept within 84 articles found in six leading and relevant learning sciences journals.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study’s findings show that school enculturation discourse is divided between those that view it unidirectionally, bidirectionally or both, and that three reifications of associated cultures (authentic, designed and traditional) together with various conduits frame the way learning environments are designed to facilitate enculturation.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis metasynthesis can help advance sociocultural research in schools by clarifying the meaning and conceptualization of a central idea in the field.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis study can help teachers and educational researchers clarify the role that culture has in the designs of their learning environments.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nCulture is a vital facet of learning; designers of learning environments need to understand the way culture interplays with learning.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nAs this research shows, current school enculturation discourse is vague and often appears to be applied inconsistently. It is vital for any field to reflect on its own discourse to sharpen the conceptual tools that it uses so that it can advance.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-11-2021-0103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-11-2021-0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在社会文化研究中,文化化是一个核心和决定性的概念,它为学校学习环境的设计提供了信息。现在,这个想法在该领域出现三十年了,作者认为是时候反思它了,因为它的使用中出现了一些模棱两可的地方,这就是本研究的目的。设计/方法/方法作者对学习科学家的学校文化话语进行了元合成。这包括在6个领先和相关的学习科学期刊上审查84篇文章中的概念。本研究的发现表明,学校文化话语分为单向、双向或两者兼而有之,相关文化的三种具体化(真实的、设计的和传统的)以及各种渠道构成了学习环境的设计方式,以促进文化适应。研究局限/启示这种元合成可以通过澄清该领域中心思想的含义和概念化来帮助推进学校的社会文化研究。实践意义本研究可以帮助教师和教育研究者明确文化在学习环境设计中的作用。文化是学习的一个重要方面;学习环境的设计者需要了解文化与学习相互作用的方式。原创性/价值本研究表明,当前的学校文化话语是模糊的,并且经常出现不一致的应用。对于任何领域来说,反思自己的话语,锐化它所使用的概念工具,以便它能够前进,这是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
School enculturation discourse: a meta synthesis from research in the learning sciences
Purpose Enculturation is a central and defining idea within socioculturally minded research that informs the design of school learning environments. Now, three decades since the idea has emerged in the field, the authors believe it is time to reflect on it because of several ambiguities that have emerged from its use, which is the purpose of this study Design/methodology/approach The authors carried out a metasynthesis of learning scientists’ school enculturation discourse. This included reviewing the concept within 84 articles found in six leading and relevant learning sciences journals. Findings This study’s findings show that school enculturation discourse is divided between those that view it unidirectionally, bidirectionally or both, and that three reifications of associated cultures (authentic, designed and traditional) together with various conduits frame the way learning environments are designed to facilitate enculturation. Research limitations/implications This metasynthesis can help advance sociocultural research in schools by clarifying the meaning and conceptualization of a central idea in the field. Practical implications This study can help teachers and educational researchers clarify the role that culture has in the designs of their learning environments. Social implications Culture is a vital facet of learning; designers of learning environments need to understand the way culture interplays with learning. Originality/value As this research shows, current school enculturation discourse is vague and often appears to be applied inconsistently. It is vital for any field to reflect on its own discourse to sharpen the conceptual tools that it uses so that it can advance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Learning Sciences
Information and Learning Sciences INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Information and Learning Sciences advances inter-disciplinary research that explores scholarly intersections shared within 2 key fields: information science and the learning sciences / education sciences. The journal provides a publication venue for work that strengthens our scholarly understanding of human inquiry and learning phenomena, especially as they relate to design and uses of information and e-learning systems innovations.
期刊最新文献
A critical (theory) data literacy: tales from the field Toward a new framework for teaching algorithmic literacy Promoting students’ informal inferential reasoning through arts-integrated data literacy education The data awareness framework as part of data literacies in K-12 education Learning experience network analysis for design-based research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1