{"title":"从波尔克街到破碎的地球;或者,文学自然主义的地理学启示","authors":"C. Robinson","doi":"10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN HIS RECENT “RE-VISIONING AMERICAN LITERARY NATURALISM,” MARC Egnal identifies two problems in the study of American naturalism. First, naturalism scholars can be accused of a myopic preference for the canonical authors Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, and Stephen Crane. Then, based on this myopia, naturalism enjoys an undeservedly “broad temporal reach” as latter-day authors like Hemingway, DeLillo, and McCarthy earn the naturalist title by stylistic resemblance to Norris and company. Egnal proposes to solve both problems by replacing the author myopia with a Darwinian one; only “works in which the ‘laws’ of heredity, or environment, or both strongly influenced how characters behaved” are","PeriodicalId":45935,"journal":{"name":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale Shifts from Polk Street to a Broken Earth; or, Literary Naturalism's Geontological Affordances\",\"authors\":\"C. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IN HIS RECENT “RE-VISIONING AMERICAN LITERARY NATURALISM,” MARC Egnal identifies two problems in the study of American naturalism. First, naturalism scholars can be accused of a myopic preference for the canonical authors Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, and Stephen Crane. Then, based on this myopia, naturalism enjoys an undeservedly “broad temporal reach” as latter-day authors like Hemingway, DeLillo, and McCarthy earn the naturalist title by stylistic resemblance to Norris and company. Egnal proposes to solve both problems by replacing the author myopia with a Darwinian one; only “works in which the ‘laws’ of heredity, or environment, or both strongly influenced how characters behaved” are\",\"PeriodicalId\":45935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scale Shifts from Polk Street to a Broken Earth; or, Literary Naturalism's Geontological Affordances
IN HIS RECENT “RE-VISIONING AMERICAN LITERARY NATURALISM,” MARC Egnal identifies two problems in the study of American naturalism. First, naturalism scholars can be accused of a myopic preference for the canonical authors Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, and Stephen Crane. Then, based on this myopia, naturalism enjoys an undeservedly “broad temporal reach” as latter-day authors like Hemingway, DeLillo, and McCarthy earn the naturalist title by stylistic resemblance to Norris and company. Egnal proposes to solve both problems by replacing the author myopia with a Darwinian one; only “works in which the ‘laws’ of heredity, or environment, or both strongly influenced how characters behaved” are
期刊介绍:
The New Centennial Review is devoted to comparative studies of the Americas that suggest possibilities for a different future. Centennial Review is published three times a year under the editorship of Scott Michaelsen (Department of English, Michigan State University) and David E. Johnson (Department of Comparative Literature, SUNY at Buffalo). The journal recognizes that the language of the Americas is translation, and that questions of translation, dialogue, and border crossings (linguistic, cultural, national, and the like) are necessary for rethinking the foundations and limits of the Americas.