类风湿关节炎滤过性白细胞清除术淋巴细胞耗竭及临床疗效比较。

Y. Ueki, H. Nakamura, Y. Kanamoto, M. Miyazaki, M. Yano, K. Matsumoto, S. Miyake, T. Tominaga, M. Tominaga, S. Yamasaki, K. Eguchi
{"title":"类风湿关节炎滤过性白细胞清除术淋巴细胞耗竭及临床疗效比较。","authors":"Y. Ueki, H. Nakamura, Y. Kanamoto, M. Miyazaki, M. Yano, K. Matsumoto, S. Miyake, T. Tominaga, M. Tominaga, S. Yamasaki, K. Eguchi","doi":"10.1046/J.1526-0968.2001.00375.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the relationship between the clinical benefit of filtration leukocytapheresis (LCP) and the number of removed leukocytes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). LCP was performed in 31 drug-resistant RA patients. LCP was carried out 3 times with 1 week separating each session. Assessment of RA before and after LCP showed a substantial and rapid improvement in tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, and patients' and physicians' assessments. Careful analysis indicated that 19 of 31 patients with RA showed > or = 20% improvement following LCP therapy. The number of leukocytes in the peripheral blood significantly decreased during each session of LCP. However, there was no significant decrease in the number of circulating blood cells during the study period. No adverse reactions or complications were noted. There was no significant difference in any indices of clinical activity and the removal rates of leukocytes between responders and nonresponders. The total numbers of removed lymphocytes in responders were significantly higher than those in nonresponders (responders 64.1 x 10(8) versus nonresponders 50.7 x10(8), p < 0.05). The relationship between clinical effectiveness and the number of removed granulocytes and monocytes was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that filtration LCP to remove leukocytes from the peripheral blood, especially lymphocytes, exerts an immunomodulatory effect in patients with RA.","PeriodicalId":79755,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of lymphocyte depletion and clinical effectiveness on filtration leukocytapheresis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Y. Ueki, H. Nakamura, Y. Kanamoto, M. Miyazaki, M. Yano, K. Matsumoto, S. Miyake, T. Tominaga, M. Tominaga, S. Yamasaki, K. Eguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1526-0968.2001.00375.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluated the relationship between the clinical benefit of filtration leukocytapheresis (LCP) and the number of removed leukocytes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). LCP was performed in 31 drug-resistant RA patients. LCP was carried out 3 times with 1 week separating each session. Assessment of RA before and after LCP showed a substantial and rapid improvement in tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, and patients' and physicians' assessments. Careful analysis indicated that 19 of 31 patients with RA showed > or = 20% improvement following LCP therapy. The number of leukocytes in the peripheral blood significantly decreased during each session of LCP. However, there was no significant decrease in the number of circulating blood cells during the study period. No adverse reactions or complications were noted. There was no significant difference in any indices of clinical activity and the removal rates of leukocytes between responders and nonresponders. The total numbers of removed lymphocytes in responders were significantly higher than those in nonresponders (responders 64.1 x 10(8) versus nonresponders 50.7 x10(8), p < 0.05). The relationship between clinical effectiveness and the number of removed granulocytes and monocytes was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that filtration LCP to remove leukocytes from the peripheral blood, especially lymphocytes, exerts an immunomodulatory effect in patients with RA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1526-0968.2001.00375.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1526-0968.2001.00375.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我们评估了滤过性白细胞摘除术(LCP)与类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者白细胞去除数量之间的关系。31例耐药RA患者行LCP。LCP进行3次,每次间隔1周。LCP前后对RA的评估显示,在压痛关节计数、肿胀关节计数以及患者和医生的评估方面有了实质性和快速的改善。仔细分析表明,31例RA患者中有19例在LCP治疗后表现出>或= 20%的改善。在LCP的每个疗程中,外周血中白细胞的数量明显减少。然而,在研究期间,循环血细胞的数量并没有明显减少。无不良反应及并发症。反应者和无反应者在临床活性和白细胞清除率的任何指标上均无显著差异。应答者的淋巴细胞总清除数显著高于无应答者(应答者64.1 × 10(8)比无应答者50.7 × 10(8), p < 0.05)。临床疗效与粒细胞、单核细胞清除数的关系无统计学意义。我们的研究结果表明,滤过性LCP去除外周血中的白细胞,特别是淋巴细胞,对RA患者具有免疫调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of lymphocyte depletion and clinical effectiveness on filtration leukocytapheresis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
We evaluated the relationship between the clinical benefit of filtration leukocytapheresis (LCP) and the number of removed leukocytes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). LCP was performed in 31 drug-resistant RA patients. LCP was carried out 3 times with 1 week separating each session. Assessment of RA before and after LCP showed a substantial and rapid improvement in tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, and patients' and physicians' assessments. Careful analysis indicated that 19 of 31 patients with RA showed > or = 20% improvement following LCP therapy. The number of leukocytes in the peripheral blood significantly decreased during each session of LCP. However, there was no significant decrease in the number of circulating blood cells during the study period. No adverse reactions or complications were noted. There was no significant difference in any indices of clinical activity and the removal rates of leukocytes between responders and nonresponders. The total numbers of removed lymphocytes in responders were significantly higher than those in nonresponders (responders 64.1 x 10(8) versus nonresponders 50.7 x10(8), p < 0.05). The relationship between clinical effectiveness and the number of removed granulocytes and monocytes was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that filtration LCP to remove leukocytes from the peripheral blood, especially lymphocytes, exerts an immunomodulatory effect in patients with RA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidential Address: PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Fluctuations in the peripheral blood leukocyte and platelet counts in leukocytapheresis in healthy volunteers. Mobilization factors of peripheral blood stem cells in healthy donors. Cytokine removal by plasma exchange with continuous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. In vitro evaluation of newly developed adsorbent for selective removal of glycosylated low-density lipoprotein.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1