Laura Tabacof, Andrew D. Delgado, Sophie Dewil, Fabiana Reis, Camila Molina Velar, Munique Egle Dona Corteline, R. Cecatto, D. Putrino, M. Imamura, L. Battistella, C. M. Moran de Brito
{"title":"继发性骨癌患者门诊康复的安全性和可行性:初步研究","authors":"Laura Tabacof, Andrew D. Delgado, Sophie Dewil, Fabiana Reis, Camila Molina Velar, Munique Egle Dona Corteline, R. Cecatto, D. Putrino, M. Imamura, L. Battistella, C. M. Moran de Brito","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Because of fear of skeletal complications, physicians often avoid referring patients with secondary bone cancer (SBC) to physical rehabilitation. However, there is little evidence on the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) and pathological fracture (PF) during rehabilitation therapies. Objective: To determine the risk of PF following physical rehabilitation in people with SBC. Design: Single-group, single-centered interventional clinical trial. Setting: University-based outpatient rehabilitation clinic. Patients: Forty-eight patients with confirmed diagnosis of SBC were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were prescribed a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Participants and rehabilitation therapists were trained to detect and report symptoms that would indicate PF. Radiographs were used to confirm the presence of PF. Measurements: The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of an outpatient rehabilitation program for patients with SBC. Safety was measured by the rate of SREs. Feasibility was measured by the ability to successfully complete the program. Secondary outcome measures included Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores to assess pain intensity. Results: One PF was detected, which occurred outside of rehabilitation therapy. Two other SREs occurred, resulting in a total event rate of 11.8 for every 10 000 hours of exposure. There was a significant improvement in NRS (95% CI, 1.41-3.08, P < .001) and SF-36 measures (95% CI, 80.35-158.11, P < .001). Limitations: Twenty participants (42%) did not complete the rehabilitation program due to clinical complications or death. Conclusions: Rehabilitation interventions may not increase the risk of SREs or PF in patients with SBC. Further research is indicated to verify these findings.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"60 1","pages":"E42 - E50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient Rehabilitation in Patients With Secondary Bone Cancer: A Preliminary Study\",\"authors\":\"Laura Tabacof, Andrew D. Delgado, Sophie Dewil, Fabiana Reis, Camila Molina Velar, Munique Egle Dona Corteline, R. Cecatto, D. Putrino, M. Imamura, L. Battistella, C. M. Moran de Brito\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Because of fear of skeletal complications, physicians often avoid referring patients with secondary bone cancer (SBC) to physical rehabilitation. However, there is little evidence on the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) and pathological fracture (PF) during rehabilitation therapies. Objective: To determine the risk of PF following physical rehabilitation in people with SBC. Design: Single-group, single-centered interventional clinical trial. Setting: University-based outpatient rehabilitation clinic. Patients: Forty-eight patients with confirmed diagnosis of SBC were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were prescribed a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Participants and rehabilitation therapists were trained to detect and report symptoms that would indicate PF. Radiographs were used to confirm the presence of PF. Measurements: The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of an outpatient rehabilitation program for patients with SBC. Safety was measured by the rate of SREs. Feasibility was measured by the ability to successfully complete the program. Secondary outcome measures included Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores to assess pain intensity. Results: One PF was detected, which occurred outside of rehabilitation therapy. Two other SREs occurred, resulting in a total event rate of 11.8 for every 10 000 hours of exposure. There was a significant improvement in NRS (95% CI, 1.41-3.08, P < .001) and SF-36 measures (95% CI, 80.35-158.11, P < .001). Limitations: Twenty participants (42%) did not complete the rehabilitation program due to clinical complications or death. Conclusions: Rehabilitation interventions may not increase the risk of SREs or PF in patients with SBC. Further research is indicated to verify these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"E42 - E50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:由于担心骨骼并发症,医生通常避免将继发性骨癌(SBC)患者转介到物理康复。然而,很少有证据表明在康复治疗过程中骨骼相关事件(SREs)和病理性骨折(PF)的风险。目的:确定SBC患者肢体康复后发生PF的风险。设计:单组、单中心介入临床试验。单位:校级康复门诊。患者:48例确诊为SBC的患者入组。干预措施:参与者被规定了一个多学科的康复计划。参与者和康复治疗师接受培训,以检测和报告可能表明PF的症状。x线片用于确认PF的存在。测量:主要结果是SBC患者门诊康复计划的安全性和可行性。安全性以SREs率衡量。可行性是通过成功完成项目的能力来衡量的。次要结果测量包括简短健康调查(SF-36)和评估疼痛强度的数字评定量表(NRS)评分。结果:1例PF发生在康复治疗外。另外还发生了两次SREs,导致每10,000小时暴露的总事件率为11.8。NRS (95% CI, 1.41-3.08, P < .001)和SF-36指标(95% CI, 80.35-158.11, P < .001)均有显著改善。局限性:20名参与者(42%)由于临床并发症或死亡而未完成康复计划。结论:康复干预可能不会增加SBC患者发生SREs或PF的风险。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient Rehabilitation in Patients With Secondary Bone Cancer: A Preliminary Study
Background: Because of fear of skeletal complications, physicians often avoid referring patients with secondary bone cancer (SBC) to physical rehabilitation. However, there is little evidence on the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) and pathological fracture (PF) during rehabilitation therapies. Objective: To determine the risk of PF following physical rehabilitation in people with SBC. Design: Single-group, single-centered interventional clinical trial. Setting: University-based outpatient rehabilitation clinic. Patients: Forty-eight patients with confirmed diagnosis of SBC were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were prescribed a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Participants and rehabilitation therapists were trained to detect and report symptoms that would indicate PF. Radiographs were used to confirm the presence of PF. Measurements: The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of an outpatient rehabilitation program for patients with SBC. Safety was measured by the rate of SREs. Feasibility was measured by the ability to successfully complete the program. Secondary outcome measures included Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores to assess pain intensity. Results: One PF was detected, which occurred outside of rehabilitation therapy. Two other SREs occurred, resulting in a total event rate of 11.8 for every 10 000 hours of exposure. There was a significant improvement in NRS (95% CI, 1.41-3.08, P < .001) and SF-36 measures (95% CI, 80.35-158.11, P < .001). Limitations: Twenty participants (42%) did not complete the rehabilitation program due to clinical complications or death. Conclusions: Rehabilitation interventions may not increase the risk of SREs or PF in patients with SBC. Further research is indicated to verify these findings.