消失的行为:虚构的资本、审美无神论和艺术界

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Visual Art Practice Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/14702029.2020.1808336
Kathryn Brown
{"title":"消失的行为:虚构的资本、审美无神论和艺术界","authors":"Kathryn Brown","doi":"10.1080/14702029.2020.1808336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article argues that as the market for art rises to prominence both economically and conceptually, the artwork becomes a form of ‘fictitious capital’ that threatens the ontological status of the object and forces reconsideration of the role of the museum. These issues are examined through the lens of empirical market data, contemporary art, and analytic aesthetics. David Carrier’s conception of ‘aesthetic atheism’ is tested against the background of both recent developments in the art market and creative strategies that stage the disappearance of the artwork. It is argued that the proliferation of spectacular auctions, art fairs, and information about sales prices results in a new object of appreciation: the market itself. The result is that the market is ‘aestheticized’ and constituted as a unique sphere of social goods in which the values traditionally associated with art are displaced.","PeriodicalId":35077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Art Practice","volume":"42 1","pages":"225 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disappearing acts: fictitious capital, aesthetic atheism, and the artworld\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14702029.2020.1808336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article argues that as the market for art rises to prominence both economically and conceptually, the artwork becomes a form of ‘fictitious capital’ that threatens the ontological status of the object and forces reconsideration of the role of the museum. These issues are examined through the lens of empirical market data, contemporary art, and analytic aesthetics. David Carrier’s conception of ‘aesthetic atheism’ is tested against the background of both recent developments in the art market and creative strategies that stage the disappearance of the artwork. It is argued that the proliferation of spectacular auctions, art fairs, and information about sales prices results in a new object of appreciation: the market itself. The result is that the market is ‘aestheticized’ and constituted as a unique sphere of social goods in which the values traditionally associated with art are displaced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Visual Art Practice\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Visual Art Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1808336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Art Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1808336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,随着艺术市场在经济上和概念上的突出,艺术品成为一种“虚拟资本”的形式,威胁到对象的本体论地位,并迫使人们重新考虑博物馆的角色。这些问题是通过实证市场数据,当代艺术和分析美学的镜头检查。David Carrier的“美学无神论”概念在艺术市场最近的发展和艺术作品消失的创作策略的背景下得到了检验。有人认为,壮观的拍卖、艺术博览会和有关销售价格的信息的激增,产生了一个新的欣赏对象:市场本身。其结果是,市场被“审美化”,并构成了一个独特的社会商品领域,传统上与艺术相关的价值被取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disappearing acts: fictitious capital, aesthetic atheism, and the artworld
ABSTRACT This article argues that as the market for art rises to prominence both economically and conceptually, the artwork becomes a form of ‘fictitious capital’ that threatens the ontological status of the object and forces reconsideration of the role of the museum. These issues are examined through the lens of empirical market data, contemporary art, and analytic aesthetics. David Carrier’s conception of ‘aesthetic atheism’ is tested against the background of both recent developments in the art market and creative strategies that stage the disappearance of the artwork. It is argued that the proliferation of spectacular auctions, art fairs, and information about sales prices results in a new object of appreciation: the market itself. The result is that the market is ‘aestheticized’ and constituted as a unique sphere of social goods in which the values traditionally associated with art are displaced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Art Practice
Journal of Visual Art Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Art Practice (JVAP) is a forum of debate and inquiry for research in art. JVAP is concerned with visual art practice including the social, economic, political and cultural frames within which the formal concerns of art and visual art practice are located. The journal is concerned with research engaged in these disciplines, and with the contested ideas of knowledge formed through that research. JVAP welcomes submissions that explore new theories of research and practice and work on the practical and educational impact of visual arts research. JVAP recognises the diversity of research in art and visual arts, and as such, we encourage contributions from scholarly and pure research, as well as developmental, applied and pedagogical research. In addition to established scholars, we welcome and are supportive of submissions from new contributors including doctoral researchers. We seek contributions engaged with, but not limited to, these themes: -Art, visual art and research into practitioners'' methods and methodologies -Art , visual art, big data, technology, and social change -Art, visual art, and urban planning -Art, visual art, ethics and the public sphere -Art, visual art, representations and translation -Art, visual art, and philosophy -Art, visual art, methods, histories and beliefs -Art, visual art, neuroscience and the social brain -Art, visual art, and economics -Art, visual art, politics and power -Art, visual art, vision and visuality -Art, visual art, and social practice -Art, visual art, and the methodology of arts based research
期刊最新文献
Expansion painting: a visual essay For whom do site-specific art structures provide territorial services? The case of European peripheral areas ‘Lay of the land’: a descriptive look at art practice dissertations 2018–2021 ‘Lay of the land’: a descriptive look at art practice dissertations 2018–2021 History, heritage, and the site-specific in contemporary Iranian art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1