通过主动学习有效估计材料特性曲线和曲面

Yuan Tian, D. Xue, Ruihao Yuan, Yumei Zhou, Xiangdong Ding, Jun Sun, T. Lookman
{"title":"通过主动学习有效估计材料特性曲线和曲面","authors":"Yuan Tian, D. Xue, Ruihao Yuan, Yumei Zhou, Xiangdong Ding, Jun Sun, T. Lookman","doi":"10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.5.013802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between material properties and independent variables such as temperature, external field or time, is usually represented by a curve or surface in a multi-dimensional space. Determining such a curve or surface requires a series of experiments or calculations which are often time and cost consuming. A general strategy uses an appropriate utility function to sample the space to recommend the next optimal experiment or calculation within an active learning loop. However, knowing what the optimal sampling strategy to use to minimize the number of experiments is an outstanding problem. We compare a number of strategies based on directed exploration on several materials problems of varying complexity using a Kriging based model. These include one dimensional curves such as the fatigue life curve for 304L stainless steel and the Liquidus line of the Fe-C phase diagram, surfaces such as the Hartmann 3 function in 3D space and the fitted intermolecular potential for Ar-SH, and a four dimensional data set of experimental measurements for BaTiO3 based ceramics. We also consider the effects of experimental noise on the Hartmann 3 function. We find that directed exploration guided by maximum variance provides better performance overall, converging faster across several data sets. However, for certain problems, the trade-off methods incorporating exploitation can perform at least as well, if not better than maximum variance. Thus, we discuss how the choice of the utility function depends on the distribution of the data, the model performance and uncertainties, additive noise as well as the budget.","PeriodicalId":8467,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Materials Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient estimation of material property curves and surfaces via active learning\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Tian, D. Xue, Ruihao Yuan, Yumei Zhou, Xiangdong Ding, Jun Sun, T. Lookman\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.5.013802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between material properties and independent variables such as temperature, external field or time, is usually represented by a curve or surface in a multi-dimensional space. Determining such a curve or surface requires a series of experiments or calculations which are often time and cost consuming. A general strategy uses an appropriate utility function to sample the space to recommend the next optimal experiment or calculation within an active learning loop. However, knowing what the optimal sampling strategy to use to minimize the number of experiments is an outstanding problem. We compare a number of strategies based on directed exploration on several materials problems of varying complexity using a Kriging based model. These include one dimensional curves such as the fatigue life curve for 304L stainless steel and the Liquidus line of the Fe-C phase diagram, surfaces such as the Hartmann 3 function in 3D space and the fitted intermolecular potential for Ar-SH, and a four dimensional data set of experimental measurements for BaTiO3 based ceramics. We also consider the effects of experimental noise on the Hartmann 3 function. We find that directed exploration guided by maximum variance provides better performance overall, converging faster across several data sets. However, for certain problems, the trade-off methods incorporating exploitation can perform at least as well, if not better than maximum variance. Thus, we discuss how the choice of the utility function depends on the distribution of the data, the model performance and uncertainties, additive noise as well as the budget.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Materials Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Materials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.5.013802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.5.013802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

材料性能与温度、外场或时间等自变量之间的关系通常用多维空间中的曲线或曲面来表示。确定这样的曲线或曲面需要进行一系列的实验或计算,这通常既费时又费钱。一般策略使用适当的效用函数对空间进行采样,以在主动学习循环中推荐下一个最优实验或计算。然而,知道使用什么最佳采样策略来最小化实验数量是一个突出的问题。我们使用基于克里格模型的几种不同复杂性的材料问题,比较了几种基于定向探索的策略。其中包括一维曲线,如304L不锈钢的疲劳寿命曲线和Fe-C相图的液相线,曲面,如三维空间中的Hartmann 3函数和Ar-SH的拟合分子间势,以及基于BaTiO3的陶瓷的四维实验测量数据集。我们还考虑了实验噪声对哈特曼3函数的影响。我们发现,由最大方差指导的定向探索总体上提供了更好的性能,跨多个数据集的收敛速度更快。然而,对于某些问题,结合利用的权衡方法即使不比最大方差更好,至少也可以执行得很好。因此,我们讨论了效用函数的选择如何取决于数据的分布、模型性能和不确定性、附加噪声以及预算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient estimation of material property curves and surfaces via active learning
The relationship between material properties and independent variables such as temperature, external field or time, is usually represented by a curve or surface in a multi-dimensional space. Determining such a curve or surface requires a series of experiments or calculations which are often time and cost consuming. A general strategy uses an appropriate utility function to sample the space to recommend the next optimal experiment or calculation within an active learning loop. However, knowing what the optimal sampling strategy to use to minimize the number of experiments is an outstanding problem. We compare a number of strategies based on directed exploration on several materials problems of varying complexity using a Kriging based model. These include one dimensional curves such as the fatigue life curve for 304L stainless steel and the Liquidus line of the Fe-C phase diagram, surfaces such as the Hartmann 3 function in 3D space and the fitted intermolecular potential for Ar-SH, and a four dimensional data set of experimental measurements for BaTiO3 based ceramics. We also consider the effects of experimental noise on the Hartmann 3 function. We find that directed exploration guided by maximum variance provides better performance overall, converging faster across several data sets. However, for certain problems, the trade-off methods incorporating exploitation can perform at least as well, if not better than maximum variance. Thus, we discuss how the choice of the utility function depends on the distribution of the data, the model performance and uncertainties, additive noise as well as the budget.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pathway towards high throughput Quantum Monte Carlo simulations for alloys: A case study of two-dimensional (2D) GaSₓSe₁₋ₓ Data analytics accelerates the experimental discovery of new thermoelectric materials with extremely high figure of merit Thermal laser evaporation of elements from across the periodic table Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in ultra-thin Cu2Sb-type (Mn–Cr)AlGe films fabricated onto thermally oxidized silicon substrates The Mesoscale Crystallinity of Nacreous Pearls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1