Bruno Caio Silva Souza, João Marcos Rodrigues de Lucena, Dhianey de Almeida Neves, L. Pereira, E. Barros, Laís Tonello, Elaine Vieira, R. M. Cunha, Fábio Santana, I. O. Silva
{"title":"电刺激激活后电位对垂直足跟运动的影响","authors":"Bruno Caio Silva Souza, João Marcos Rodrigues de Lucena, Dhianey de Almeida Neves, L. Pereira, E. Barros, Laís Tonello, Elaine Vieira, R. M. Cunha, Fábio Santana, I. O. Silva","doi":"10.36648/1791-809X.15.1.791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Post Activation Potentiation (PAP) is the effect caused by a conditioning exercise with maximum or submaximal loads that promotes increased explosive strength in the subsequent activity. This phenomenon is due to the phosphorylation of light chain regulatory myosin manifesting in fast-twitch type II fibers. Electro-stimulation is a method that uses electric currents to promote involuntary muscle contraction, and its higher incidence in type II fibers because they have thicker and more superficial nerve endings. Objective: To compare the effects of an electro-stimulation protocol with a plyometric protocol to induce PAP on vertical jump performance. Methods: Plyometric Protocol (PP) - 2 sets of 10 ankle hops, 3 sets of 5 hundle hops, and 5 cold jumps. Electro-stimulation Protocol (EP) - Protocol 32 Neurodyn device 4 channels, Russian current, 90% of pain threshold with 3 \"rise, 12\" on, 3 \"decay and 18\" off with 70Hz frequency burst during 5 'and control condition (CC). 5 'after each protocol the Jump Power Test (JPT) was performed and 3' after the jump resistance test (RS). Results: Only the PP produced a significant effect when compared to the other protocols (p ≤ 0.05) PP+EP (290,49 ± 14,28 e 280,36 ± 10,26) (p=0.016) and PP+CC (290,49 ± 14,28 e 280,18 ± 12,07) (p=0.006). Regarding the% fatigue, the PP protocol had indices higher than the EP protocol (p=0.054) and CC (p=0.050). Conclusion: It was concluded that the electro-stimulation did not produce PAP effect nor in greater magnitude than the Plyometric protocol, but had the highest jump resistance compared to the control condition and plyometrics.","PeriodicalId":12868,"journal":{"name":"Health science journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Potentialization afterElectro-Stimulation Activation on VerticalHeel Performance\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Caio Silva Souza, João Marcos Rodrigues de Lucena, Dhianey de Almeida Neves, L. Pereira, E. Barros, Laís Tonello, Elaine Vieira, R. M. Cunha, Fábio Santana, I. O. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/1791-809X.15.1.791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Post Activation Potentiation (PAP) is the effect caused by a conditioning exercise with maximum or submaximal loads that promotes increased explosive strength in the subsequent activity. This phenomenon is due to the phosphorylation of light chain regulatory myosin manifesting in fast-twitch type II fibers. Electro-stimulation is a method that uses electric currents to promote involuntary muscle contraction, and its higher incidence in type II fibers because they have thicker and more superficial nerve endings. Objective: To compare the effects of an electro-stimulation protocol with a plyometric protocol to induce PAP on vertical jump performance. Methods: Plyometric Protocol (PP) - 2 sets of 10 ankle hops, 3 sets of 5 hundle hops, and 5 cold jumps. Electro-stimulation Protocol (EP) - Protocol 32 Neurodyn device 4 channels, Russian current, 90% of pain threshold with 3 \\\"rise, 12\\\" on, 3 \\\"decay and 18\\\" off with 70Hz frequency burst during 5 'and control condition (CC). 5 'after each protocol the Jump Power Test (JPT) was performed and 3' after the jump resistance test (RS). Results: Only the PP produced a significant effect when compared to the other protocols (p ≤ 0.05) PP+EP (290,49 ± 14,28 e 280,36 ± 10,26) (p=0.016) and PP+CC (290,49 ± 14,28 e 280,18 ± 12,07) (p=0.006). Regarding the% fatigue, the PP protocol had indices higher than the EP protocol (p=0.054) and CC (p=0.050). Conclusion: It was concluded that the electro-stimulation did not produce PAP effect nor in greater magnitude than the Plyometric protocol, but had the highest jump resistance compared to the control condition and plyometrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health science journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health science journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.15.1.791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.15.1.791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
激活后增强(PAP)是由最大或次最大负荷的调节运动引起的效应,在随后的活动中促进爆炸强度的增加。这种现象是由于轻链调节肌球蛋白的磷酸化表现在快速收缩的II型纤维中。电刺激是一种利用电流促进不随意肌收缩的方法,它在II型纤维中发病率更高,因为它们有更厚、更浅的神经末梢。目的:比较电刺激方案和增力方案诱导PAP对垂直跳跃性能的影响。方法:增强训练方案(PP) - 2组10次踝跳,3组5百跳,5次冷跳。电刺激方案(EP) -方案32 Neurodyn装置4通道,俄罗斯电流,90%疼痛阈值3“上升,12”开,3“衰减和18”关,在5 '和控制条件(CC)期间70Hz频率突发。每个方案结束后5 '进行跳跃能力测试(JPT), 3'进行跳跃阻力测试(RS)。结果:只有PP与其他方案相比(p≤0.05)PP+EP(290,49±14,28 e 280,36±10,26)(p=0.016)和PP+CC(290,49±14,28 e 280,18±12,07)(p=0.006)有显著影响。在%疲劳指数方面,PP方案高于EP方案(p=0.054)和CC方案(p=0.050)。结论:电刺激不产生PAP效应,也不产生更大程度的PAP效应,但与对照和增强方案相比,电刺激具有最高的跳跃阻力。
The Effect of Potentialization afterElectro-Stimulation Activation on VerticalHeel Performance
Introduction: Post Activation Potentiation (PAP) is the effect caused by a conditioning exercise with maximum or submaximal loads that promotes increased explosive strength in the subsequent activity. This phenomenon is due to the phosphorylation of light chain regulatory myosin manifesting in fast-twitch type II fibers. Electro-stimulation is a method that uses electric currents to promote involuntary muscle contraction, and its higher incidence in type II fibers because they have thicker and more superficial nerve endings. Objective: To compare the effects of an electro-stimulation protocol with a plyometric protocol to induce PAP on vertical jump performance. Methods: Plyometric Protocol (PP) - 2 sets of 10 ankle hops, 3 sets of 5 hundle hops, and 5 cold jumps. Electro-stimulation Protocol (EP) - Protocol 32 Neurodyn device 4 channels, Russian current, 90% of pain threshold with 3 "rise, 12" on, 3 "decay and 18" off with 70Hz frequency burst during 5 'and control condition (CC). 5 'after each protocol the Jump Power Test (JPT) was performed and 3' after the jump resistance test (RS). Results: Only the PP produced a significant effect when compared to the other protocols (p ≤ 0.05) PP+EP (290,49 ± 14,28 e 280,36 ± 10,26) (p=0.016) and PP+CC (290,49 ± 14,28 e 280,18 ± 12,07) (p=0.006). Regarding the% fatigue, the PP protocol had indices higher than the EP protocol (p=0.054) and CC (p=0.050). Conclusion: It was concluded that the electro-stimulation did not produce PAP effect nor in greater magnitude than the Plyometric protocol, but had the highest jump resistance compared to the control condition and plyometrics.