急诊科采用多流程改进干预措施减少尿培养物污染对患者的伤害

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY Patient Safety in Surgery Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.33940/med/2023.3.5
Clare Cowen, Shelley Frinsco, R. Nosal, Faith N Colen
{"title":"急诊科采用多流程改进干预措施减少尿培养物污染对患者的伤害","authors":"Clare Cowen, Shelley Frinsco, R. Nosal, Faith N Colen","doi":"10.33940/med/2023.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: From August 2018 to January 2019, the baseline urine sample contamination rate at an acute care hospital emergency department (ED) was 51%. Urine culture contamination is associated with unnecessary antibiotic use, repeat culture costs, and unnecessary inpatient admissions. These outcomes can lead to additional cost to the patient and healthcare system while leading to additional poor outcomes.\n\nMETHODS: Culture results were reviewed and the project definition of contamination was applied. Contaminated cultures were reviewed further via manual electronic health record review of ED notes to determine documentation of collection source, education prior to clean catch collection, the cognitive and physical documented descriptions of the patient, and the name of the staff member who collected the sample.\n\nINTERVENTION: Staff were educated on appropriate midstream and straight catheter collection techniques, verbal along with picture education for patients, and appropriate identification of patients who may benefit from straight catheterization instead of clean catch. \n\nRESULTS: The combined interventions resulted in a six-month decrease of contaminated urine samples from the initial 51% to <10%, resulting in an 80% decrease.\nCONCLUSION: Urine culture contamination in an acute care ED was sustainably decreased through multiple process improvement interventions. Secondary outcomes included reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use, repeat urine cultures, and unnecessary admissions.","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction of Patient Harm Through Decreasing Urine Culture Contamination in an Emergency Department Using Multiple Process Improvement Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Clare Cowen, Shelley Frinsco, R. Nosal, Faith N Colen\",\"doi\":\"10.33940/med/2023.3.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: From August 2018 to January 2019, the baseline urine sample contamination rate at an acute care hospital emergency department (ED) was 51%. Urine culture contamination is associated with unnecessary antibiotic use, repeat culture costs, and unnecessary inpatient admissions. These outcomes can lead to additional cost to the patient and healthcare system while leading to additional poor outcomes.\\n\\nMETHODS: Culture results were reviewed and the project definition of contamination was applied. Contaminated cultures were reviewed further via manual electronic health record review of ED notes to determine documentation of collection source, education prior to clean catch collection, the cognitive and physical documented descriptions of the patient, and the name of the staff member who collected the sample.\\n\\nINTERVENTION: Staff were educated on appropriate midstream and straight catheter collection techniques, verbal along with picture education for patients, and appropriate identification of patients who may benefit from straight catheterization instead of clean catch. \\n\\nRESULTS: The combined interventions resulted in a six-month decrease of contaminated urine samples from the initial 51% to <10%, resulting in an 80% decrease.\\nCONCLUSION: Urine culture contamination in an acute care ED was sustainably decreased through multiple process improvement interventions. Secondary outcomes included reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use, repeat urine cultures, and unnecessary admissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33940/med/2023.3.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/med/2023.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2018年8月至2019年1月,某医院急诊科(ED)基线尿样污染率为51%。尿培养污染与不必要的抗生素使用、重复培养费用和不必要的住院有关。这些结果可能会给患者和医疗保健系统带来额外的成本,同时导致额外的不良结果。方法:回顾培养结果,应用污染项目定义。通过对ED笔记的手动电子健康记录审查,进一步审查受污染的培养物,以确定收集来源的文件、清洁捕捞收集前的教育情况、患者的认知和身体记录描述以及收集样本的工作人员的姓名。干预措施:对工作人员进行适当的中游和直管收集技术的教育,对患者进行口头和图片教育,并适当识别可能受益于直管而不是干净捕获的患者。结果:联合干预导致六个月的污染尿液样本从最初的51%减少到<10%,减少了80%。结论:通过多种流程改进干预措施,急性急诊科尿培养物污染持续减少。次要结果包括减少不必要的抗生素使用、重复尿培养和不必要的入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduction of Patient Harm Through Decreasing Urine Culture Contamination in an Emergency Department Using Multiple Process Improvement Interventions
BACKGROUND: From August 2018 to January 2019, the baseline urine sample contamination rate at an acute care hospital emergency department (ED) was 51%. Urine culture contamination is associated with unnecessary antibiotic use, repeat culture costs, and unnecessary inpatient admissions. These outcomes can lead to additional cost to the patient and healthcare system while leading to additional poor outcomes. METHODS: Culture results were reviewed and the project definition of contamination was applied. Contaminated cultures were reviewed further via manual electronic health record review of ED notes to determine documentation of collection source, education prior to clean catch collection, the cognitive and physical documented descriptions of the patient, and the name of the staff member who collected the sample. INTERVENTION: Staff were educated on appropriate midstream and straight catheter collection techniques, verbal along with picture education for patients, and appropriate identification of patients who may benefit from straight catheterization instead of clean catch. RESULTS: The combined interventions resulted in a six-month decrease of contaminated urine samples from the initial 51% to <10%, resulting in an 80% decrease. CONCLUSION: Urine culture contamination in an acute care ED was sustainably decreased through multiple process improvement interventions. Secondary outcomes included reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use, repeat urine cultures, and unnecessary admissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bilateral lower extremity compartment syndrome after prolonged gynecological surgery in lithotomy position: a case report. The role of spinal injections towards optimizing patient selection for spinal surgery: A proof-of-concept study in 176 lower back pain patients. Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety. Association between postoperative complications and hospital length of stay: a large-scale observational study of 4,495,582 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry. Improving surgical technical skills for emergency fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures: an experimental study using a pelvic ring fracture simulator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1